HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
Search Site
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Reading the Man: A Portrait of Robert E. Lee…
Loading...

Reading the Man: A Portrait of Robert E. Lee Through His Private Letters (edition 2007)

by Elizabeth Brown Pryor

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
368569,125 (4.13)6
By the end of the Civil War, Robert E. Lee had become an iconic American figure, as much myth as mortal even before his death in 1870. Since then, few historians have attempted to dig very deeply into the 'marble man' Lee became in Southern memory. Instead, the commanding general of the Army of Northern Virginia is most often a legendary figure, rather than a human one, particularly in most histories of the Civil War era.

Biography offers an opportunity to explore the real man behind the myth, and several have attempted a more realistic portrayal of Lee. Even these books still tend to struggle with the legendary Lee who is thought to embody all that was noble in the antebellum South. Historian Elizabeth Brown Pryor has devised an ingenious way to get around these obstacles in "Reading the Man," using Lee's own words, preserved in the vast number of letters he wrote, to present his life story.

Lee was a prolific correspondent throughout his adult life, including during the Civil War years, and hundreds of these private letters survive. Using the full text of certain letters -- most by Lee, but a few by others sent to him or referring to him -- at the start of each thematic chapter, she then offers a context of theses letters using Lee's other correspondence and other historical sources.

The resulting portrait is fascinating, showing a man who was devoted to his family but who struggled with the demands of his military life and the strain it caused on those relationships. While the decision whether to fight for the Union or resign his army commission and volunteer for Virginia is well known, it is clear in Pryor's account that Lee struggled with issues of duty and honor throughout his lifetime, partially because of the negative influence of his father, "Light Horse" Harry Lee, who was less than honorable, and partially because he frequently found military service frustrating.

Particularly interesting are the chapters on Lee's service in the Army Corps of Engineers and his tenure as commandant of West Point. Lee's first serious military experiences after graduating from West Point were to oversee construction of infrastructure to preserve the port of St. Louis from the destructive forces of the Mississippi River. By all accounts, Lee handled the assignment well, though the impact of his engineering background upon his Confederate command is unexplored.

Another key assignment before the Civil War, Lee's command of West Point, is reevaluated by Pryor. Unlike other authors who imagine that Lee's years at the military academy were warm and mutually beneficial, Pryor describes a leader who was not particularly well-liked by the cadets because of his strict discipline standards and his perceived distant personality. Given the adoration that Lee's Confederate troops gave him, it is difficult to imagine that, a few years before, few West Point cadets seemed to care that little for him as superintendent.

Lee emerges as less of a mystery in Pryor's portrait. Through his letters, he seems more approachable as matters of family life, household problems, and work frustrations are discussed and endured. He also seems less of an icon, appearing to be reticent -- even shy -- around other people, though possessing both a subtle wit and a fierce temper. He is also highly compassionate and usually thoughtful of others, demonstrating wisdom gained from experience and some internal reflection -- though less so about matters regarding the slavery issue.

In the end, Pryor's book is a superb approach to the actual Robert E. Lee behind the mythical 'marble man.' Well researched and heavily documented, the narrative incorporates much information that had been overlooked or undiscovered. More than this, Pryor writes with a clear and engaging style that will be appreciated by historians and general audiences. ( )
1 vote ALincolnNut | Nov 9, 2011 |
Showing 5 of 5
This biography of Lee sets out not to supplant previous biographies, but to complement and correct them, largely on the basis of more than a thousand letters that somehow survived the ravages of the Civil War and have never been collected and published in full. Along the way, Pryor casts doubt on some enduring myths, for example, the oft-repeated claim that Lee passed up numerous lucrative business offers after the war to take on the presidency of Washington College in Lexington. The evidence for such offers is scanty, as Pryor drily puts it. Yet hers is not a work to be shelved with the debunkers; she comes away from her research with a plain admiration for the formidable qualities of this American hero. Yet it is clear that she feels that it is the hagiographers, not the debunkers, who have done the greater disservice to our memory of Lee.
Her book is carefully-structured. The twenty-six chapters are loosely arranged over a chronological understructure: the first chapter treats the heroic, flawed father Lee barely knew, the last deals with Lee’s post-mortem reputation. Yet the chapters themselves are topical. The occasion of his wedding to Mary Custis, granddaughter of Martha Washington, for instance, is the point of departure for a chapter on the couple’s marriage. Then comes a chapter on Lee as a father, soon followed by a chapter on the place of slaves in Southern households in general, with particular emphasis on the Custis-Lee family. This is entitled, with only a slight hint of irony, The Family Circle. Each chapter opens with one or more letters, cited in full, in keeping with Pryor’s thesis that it is only through his correspondence that we can get beyond the marble facade to the complex human that was Robert E. Lee.
Along the way, Pryor points out many phases in Lee’s life that were less-than-successful. Among them are his stint as superintendent of West Point, his service as cavalry officer on the Texas frontier, and his performance as slavemaster after the death of his father-in-law put him in that position. Most poignant is his decision to resign his army commission and thereby violate his oath of allegiance to the United States. It is a commonplace among Lee biographers that the decision to resign and refuse the offer to lead the Union forces was the “answer he was born to make,” as D.S. Freeman put it. Pryor however maintains that it did not come easily to him. “This poignant moment, when a strong, steadfast man paced and prayed in despair, is a scene worthy of Shakespeare precisely because it so palpably expresses the contradictions in his heart” (p. 291).
Nor does Lee’s post-war career escape Pryor’s criticism, notably for his revision of the reasons for resigning and casting his lot with the South. Lee’s was also one of the most persuasive voices purveying the pernicious sophistry that the South was not defeated, but surrendered to superior force.
Yet Pryor is also quick to praise unreservedly Lee’s successes, such as his service in the Mexican War, which brought him to the attention of his commander, Winfield Scott, who came to view him as the ablest officer in the army. Other actions she lauds are his flawless apprehension of John Brown at Harper’s Ferry, the strategical and tactical brilliance of his victory at Chancellorsville, the manner and dignity of his surrender at Appomatox, and his decision to become president of Washington College with the progressive stance toward education. Above all, she clearly admires many traits of his character, for instance his dignity and his diligence, as well as traits less-frequently associated with the man, such as a light-hearted gift for friendship. He even turns out to have been quite the flirt, while remaining faithful to his wife, on the basis of all evidence.
Along the way, there were many insights new to me. For instance, I always knew that Grant had the reputation of a relentless warrior, heedless of casualties, but I wasn't aware that this was Lee's strategy as well, even though in his case, he was using up limited resources of manpower. In a way, it was in Grant that Lee finally was confronted by someone willing to play the game the same way.
There are ample grounds for interpreting Lee’s life from psychological approaches. While Lee’s insistence on honor and duty, for instance, is typical for his class and region, one wonders if there is not also a compensation here for the indignities his family suffered through the scandals of his father and eldest brother. While aware of these possibilities, Pryor shies away from speculation, which I found sensible.
This is a book of many strengths, with only one weakness in my estimation, namely, the author’s failure at times to consider regional and class variations in some of the trends she discusses, such as the treatment of children or the evangelical revival of the early 19th century.
I have mentioned Pryor’s concern to rescue Lee from the hagiographers. Toward the end of her book, she has this to say on Lee’s apotheosis: “The disturbing point about this is not that Lee was portrayed in such an idealized light, but that so much was lost as man was turned into monument. . . . The truth is, Lee lived an all too human existence, fraught with dilemmas and decisions that would challenge the sturdiest soul. He handled some of these situations well, others with disastrous error. Never did he turn away, however, and even his sharpest critics never questioned his steadfastness. . . . The greatest honor we can give Lee is to admire him for who he actually was, rather than as an imaginary creature, which only insults him by implying that the reality was inadequate” (pp. 470–1).
A very good read, highly recommended. ( )
  HenrySt123 | Jul 19, 2021 |
The third book for our Less Stupid Civil War Reading Group, and the one I looked forward to with the least pleasure -- though a fair amount of curiosity. What I knew about Lee before reading this book could barely fill a thimble.

I did appreciate Pryor's style, and her contextualization of Lee's early life. Pryor gave a lot of background information on current mores around marriage, roles of women -- particularly in slave-holding society, changing economic behavior, etc., that we hadn't really gotten in the other books. And Pryor deliberately takes on common myths about Lee -- that he opposed slavery and secession most notably.

The whole thing -- especially the post-war period, had me constantly ruminating on the ways our stupid meat-brains work, and how much of Lee's post-war behavior was governed by his brain striving to reconcile to itself and to create a narrative of Lee's life that justified all the bloody and brutal losses he had been a part of -- that he'd led his men into -- with nothing, in the end, to show for it. How does anyone make peace with that and find a way to make forward?

I have so many thoughts about Lee, and this book, and we had excellent, juicy discussions over it, but I won't go on with this review forever.

I enjoyed this book more than I expected and learned a lot. ( )
1 vote greeniezona | Jan 24, 2019 |
By the end of the Civil War, Robert E. Lee had become an iconic American figure, as much myth as mortal even before his death in 1870. Since then, few historians have attempted to dig very deeply into the 'marble man' Lee became in Southern memory. Instead, the commanding general of the Army of Northern Virginia is most often a legendary figure, rather than a human one, particularly in most histories of the Civil War era.

Biography offers an opportunity to explore the real man behind the myth, and several have attempted a more realistic portrayal of Lee. Even these books still tend to struggle with the legendary Lee who is thought to embody all that was noble in the antebellum South. Historian Elizabeth Brown Pryor has devised an ingenious way to get around these obstacles in "Reading the Man," using Lee's own words, preserved in the vast number of letters he wrote, to present his life story.

Lee was a prolific correspondent throughout his adult life, including during the Civil War years, and hundreds of these private letters survive. Using the full text of certain letters -- most by Lee, but a few by others sent to him or referring to him -- at the start of each thematic chapter, she then offers a context of theses letters using Lee's other correspondence and other historical sources.

The resulting portrait is fascinating, showing a man who was devoted to his family but who struggled with the demands of his military life and the strain it caused on those relationships. While the decision whether to fight for the Union or resign his army commission and volunteer for Virginia is well known, it is clear in Pryor's account that Lee struggled with issues of duty and honor throughout his lifetime, partially because of the negative influence of his father, "Light Horse" Harry Lee, who was less than honorable, and partially because he frequently found military service frustrating.

Particularly interesting are the chapters on Lee's service in the Army Corps of Engineers and his tenure as commandant of West Point. Lee's first serious military experiences after graduating from West Point were to oversee construction of infrastructure to preserve the port of St. Louis from the destructive forces of the Mississippi River. By all accounts, Lee handled the assignment well, though the impact of his engineering background upon his Confederate command is unexplored.

Another key assignment before the Civil War, Lee's command of West Point, is reevaluated by Pryor. Unlike other authors who imagine that Lee's years at the military academy were warm and mutually beneficial, Pryor describes a leader who was not particularly well-liked by the cadets because of his strict discipline standards and his perceived distant personality. Given the adoration that Lee's Confederate troops gave him, it is difficult to imagine that, a few years before, few West Point cadets seemed to care that little for him as superintendent.

Lee emerges as less of a mystery in Pryor's portrait. Through his letters, he seems more approachable as matters of family life, household problems, and work frustrations are discussed and endured. He also seems less of an icon, appearing to be reticent -- even shy -- around other people, though possessing both a subtle wit and a fierce temper. He is also highly compassionate and usually thoughtful of others, demonstrating wisdom gained from experience and some internal reflection -- though less so about matters regarding the slavery issue.

In the end, Pryor's book is a superb approach to the actual Robert E. Lee behind the mythical 'marble man.' Well researched and heavily documented, the narrative incorporates much information that had been overlooked or undiscovered. More than this, Pryor writes with a clear and engaging style that will be appreciated by historians and general audiences. ( )
1 vote ALincolnNut | Nov 9, 2011 |
One of the best biographies on Lee. It delves into his family life, military career and his views on slavery and secession. Every chapters begins with a letter either written by him or his family and friends. ( )
  lfranco | Jul 25, 2007 |
Lincoln Prize Winner: 2008
  CWPT | Mar 11, 2008 |
Showing 5 of 5

Current Discussions

None

Popular covers

Quick Links

Rating

Average: (4.13)
0.5
1 1
1.5
2 2
2.5
3 2
3.5 2
4 7
4.5 1
5 13

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 203,235,757 books! | Top bar: Always visible