Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... Fire in the valley : the making of the personal computer (original 1984; edition 2000)by Paul Freiberger, Michael SwaineAnother pleasant reread of a personal computing history book I originally read in the 1980s. The authors--both of whom edited computer publications as the stories developed--tell the story of the beginnings of the PC revolution from the perspective of Silicon Valley. Their version heavily overlaps Stephen Levy's Hackers, which was published a few months later, but it's a very different tale in style and substance. For one thing, this is a less literary effort. It's also differently focused, as these guys care more about technical details than Levy does. And the largely west-coast perspective lets this book examine relationships in ways Hackers' structure didn't permit. The book consists of many short sections, organized into eight thematic (and roughly chronological) chapters. While the sections are related, they're essentially independent. It's pretty common to find more than one version of a story/encounter within the book, often in widely separated places. This in no way harms the narrative; it's just a quirk of the book's organization. Because the book's nearly three decades old, some of the context seems a little odd. In particular, a pervasive fear of IBM dates the book--not to say the fears weren't real, but we now know IBM had a significantly different impact than the PC industry expected. Similarly, there's essentially no recognition of the immense power Microsoft would come to yield in the industry, and (of course) no clue about Apple's long stagnation, and resurrection. And the Internet has no presence in this book whatever. A very worthwhile effort. If you're interested in this era's history, you should read both this book and Levy's; their differences and their similarities are both instructive. This review has also been published on a dabbler's journal. A fun book that covers the personal computer revolution from the mid 70's to the late 90's. Lots of great quotes and snippets from interviews plus several picture sections. The only weak part of the book is the very end where they attempt to draw conclusions about Internet issues and other things that are long since past history for us now. |
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
Google Books — Loading... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)338.47004160973Social sciences Economics Production Secondary industries and services Services and specific products Computer IndustryLC ClassificationRatingAverage:
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
The authors--both of whom edited computer publications as the stories developed--tell the story of the beginnings of the PC revolution from the perspective of Silicon Valley. Their version heavily overlaps Stephen Levy's Hackers, which was published a few months later, but it's a very different tale in style and substance.
For one thing, this is a less literary effort. It's also differently focused, as these guys care more about technical details than Levy does. And the largely west-coast perspective lets this book examine relationships in ways Hackers' structure didn't permit.
The book consists of many short sections, organized into eight thematic (and roughly chronological) chapters. While the sections are related, they're essentially independent. It's pretty common to find more than one version of a story/encounter within the book, often in widely separated places. This in no way harms the narrative; it's just a quirk of the book's organization.
Because the book's nearly three decades old, some of the context seems a little odd. In particular, a pervasive fear of IBM dates the book--not to say the fears weren't real, but we now know IBM had a significantly different impact than the PC industry expected. Similarly, there's essentially no recognition of the immense power Microsoft would come to yield in the industry, and (of course) no clue about Apple's long stagnation, and resurrection. And the Internet has no presence in this book whatever.
A very worthwhile effort. If you're interested in this era's history, you should read both this book and Levy's; their differences and their similarities are both instructive.
This review has also been published on a dabbler's journal. ( )