 | Richard Maxwell - Art - 2002 - 484 pages
...think of the answer I had before given, that for anything I knew, the watch might always have been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the watch as well as the stone? — w ILLIAM PALEY, opening sentences of Natural Theology ILLUSTRATED CLOCKS serve their... | |
 | John A. Moore - Science - 2002 - 243 pages
...of the answer which I had before given, that, for any thing I knew, the watch might have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the...as in the first? For this reason, and for no other, viz. that, when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive (what we could not discover in the stone)... | |
 | Charles Darwin - History - 2003 - 676 pages
...of the answer which I had before given, that, for any thing I knew, the watch might have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the...as in the first? For this reason, and for no other, viz. that, when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive (what we could not discover in the stone)... | |
 | Lewis Vaughn, Austin Dacey - Philosophy - 2003 - 244 pages
...think of the answer which I had given— that, for anything I knew, the watch might have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the...as in the first? For this reason, and for no other; viz., that, when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive (what we could not discover in the stone)... | |
 | Michael Ruse - History - 2003 - 392 pages
...of the answer which I had before given, that for any thing I knew the watch might have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the...as in the first? For this reason, and for no other, namely, that when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive — what we could not discover in the stone... | |
 | Timothy A. Robinson - Philosophy - 2002 - 452 pages
...think of the answer which I had before given, that for anything I knew the watch might have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the...as in the first? For this reason, and for no other, namely, that when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive — what we could not discover in the stone... | |
 | Alister E. McGrath - Religion - 2001 - 354 pages
...given, that for any thing I knew the watch might have always been there. Yet why should this answer not serve for the watch as well as for the stone; why is it not admissible in the second case as in the first? For this teason, and for no other, namely, that when... | |
 | Anne Jordan, Neil Lockyer, Edwin Tate - Juvenile Nonfiction - 2004 - 262 pages
...of the answer which I had before given, that for anything I knew, the watch might have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the...as in the first? For this reason, and for no other, namely, that when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive - what we could not discover in the stone... | |
 | William A. Dembski, Michael Ruse - Science - 2004 - 430 pages
...answer which I had before given, that for any thing I knew the watch mighr have always been there. Yel why should not this answer serve for the watch as...as in the first? For this reason, and for no other, namely, that when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive - what we could not discover in the stone... | |
 | Abigail Lustig, Robert J. Richards, Michael Ruse - Technology & Engineering - 2004 - 216 pages
...answer which 1 had helore given, that, for anything I knew, the watch might have always been there. Vet why should not this answer serve for the watch as...as in the first? For this reason, and for no other, viz. that, when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive Iwhat we could not discover in the stone1... | |
| |
I knew, the watch might have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the watch as well as for the stone ? why is it not as admissible in the second case, as in the first ? For this reason, and for no other, viz. 
