 | English literature - 1845 - 758 pages
...the answer which I had before given — that for any thing I knew, the watch might have always been there. Yet, why should not this answer serve for the...stone ? Why is it not as admissible in the second VOL. II. NO. IV. U case as in the first ? For this reason, and for no other, viz. that, when we come... | |
 | 1845 - 672 pages
...for the watch as well as for the stone ? Why is it not as admissible in the second VOL. II. NO. IV. U case as in the first ? For this reason, and for no other, viz. that, when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive (what we could not discover in the stone,)... | |
 | William Paley - Natural history - 1849 - 306 pages
...answer which I had before given — that for anythmg I knew, the watch might have always been there. Tet why should not this answer serve for the watch as...as in the first ? For this reason, and for no other — namely, that when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive (what we could not discover in the... | |
 | William Paley - Theology - 1850 - 628 pages
...why should not this answer serve for the watch as well as for the stone 1 why is it not as admissable in the second case as in the first ! For this reason, and for no other, viz. that when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive (what we could not discover in the stone)... | |
 | William Paley - 1851 - 766 pages
...the answer which I had before given, — that, for any thing I knew, the watch might have always been e following possibilities 6rst ? For this reason, and for no other, viz. that, when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive... | |
 | William Jordan Unwin - 1853 - 172 pages
...precarious independence. — Mackintosh. LESSON V.— FRIDAY. THE EXISTENCE OF GOD. In crossing a heath, suppose I pitched my foot against a stone, and were...should not this answer serve for the watch as well as the stone ? why is it not as admissible in the second case as in the first ? For this reason, and for... | |
 | Robert Blakey - Caricature - 1859 - 422 pages
...of the answer which I had before given, that, for anything I knew, the watch might have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the...as in the first? For this reason, and for no other, viz., that when we come to inspect the watch we perceive (what we could not discover in the stone)... | |
 | William Jordan Unwin - 1862 - 300 pages
...possibly answer, that, for anything I knew to the contrary, it had lain there for ever ; nor woald it, perhaps, be very easy to show the absurdity of...should not this answer serve for the watch as well as the stone ? why is it not as admissible in the second case as in the first ? For this reason, and for... | |
 | William Cooke - God - 1877 - 574 pages
...the answer which I had before given — that for anything I knew, the watch might have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the...as in the first? For this reason, and for no other — namely, that when we come to inspect the watch we perceive (what we could not discover in the stone)... | |
 | sir John Robert L. Emilius Laurie (3rd bart.) - 1878 - 424 pages
...the answer which I had before given, — that, for anything I knew, the watch might have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the...as in the first? For this reason, and for no other, viz. that, when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive (what we could not discover in the stone)... | |
| |
I knew, the watch might have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the watch as well as for the stone ? why is it not as admissible in the second case, as in the first ? For this reason, and for no other, viz. 
