 | Elegant extracts - 1816 - 1082 pages
...I knew, the wtch might hare always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the **<i M well as for the stone ? why is it not as admissible in the second case, as in ttf first? For this reason, and for no "tier, viz. that, when we come to inspect *e watch, we perceive... | |
 | William Paley - Natural history - 1819 - 302 pages
...of the answer which I had before given, that for any thing, I knew, the watch might have always been there. Yet, why should not this answer serve for the Watch, as well as for the stone r Why is it not as admissible in the second case, as in the first P For this reason. and for no other,... | |
 | Charles Knight - 1820 - 636 pages
...of the answer which I had before given, that, for any thing I knew, the watch might have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the...in the first ? For this reason, and for no other, viz. that, when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive (what we could not discover in the stone)... | |
 | William Paley - 1823 - 382 pages
...of the answer which I had before given, that, for any thing I knew, the watch might have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the...in the first ? For this reason, and for no other, viz. that, when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive (what we could not discover in the stone)... | |
 | Vicesimus Knox - English prose literature - 1824 - 794 pages
...of the answer which I had before given, that, for any thing I knew, the watch might have always been a huge rock of adamant running through the midst...it, insomuch that I could discover nothing in it: viz. that, when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive (what we could not discover in the stone)... | |
 | Charles Morey - Bible - 1824 - 212 pages
...of the auswer which I had before given, that for any thing I knew the watch might have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the watch as well as for the stone. For this reason and for no other, viz : that when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive, (what... | |
 | William Paley - 1824 - 382 pages
...answer which I had before given, that, for any thing I knew, the watch might have always been there. Yel why should not this answer serve for the watch as well as for the stone 1 why is it not as admissible in the second case, as in the first ? For this reason, and for no other,... | |
 | William Paley - Natural history - 1824 - 324 pages
...of the answer which I had before given, that, for any thing I knew, the watch might have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the watch, as welt as for the stone ? Why is it not as admissible in the second case as in the first ? For this reason,... | |
 | William Paley - Theology - 1825 - 440 pages
...of the answer which I had before given, that, for any thing I knew, the watch might have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the...in the first ? For this reason, and for no other, viz. that when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive (what we could not discover in the stone)... | |
 | William Paley - Natural theology - 1826 - 628 pages
...of the answer which I had before given, that for any thing I knew, the watch might have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the...in the first ? For this reason, and for no other, viz. that, when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive (what we could not discover in the stone)... | |
| |
I knew, the watch might have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the watch as well as for the stone ? why is it not as admissible in the second case, as in the first ? For this reason, and for no other, viz. 
