Page images
PDF
EPUB

Northern Central Coal Co. v. Coal &
Iron Co., 37 Md. 537, 8 10, 11,
28, 323,
Northern R. R. v. Concord R. R., 27
N. H. 183, 45.
Northampton Bridge, 116 Mass. 442,

8 240.

Norton v. Walkill R. R., 61 Barb. 476, 8 62.

v. Walkill Valley R. R., 63 Barb. 77, 103. Noyes v. Chapin, 6 Wend. 461, 22 110,

111.

Null v. Whitewater Canal Co., 4 Ind.

431, 2341. Nutting v. Page, 4 Gray, 581, & 295.

O'Brien v. Norwich R. R., 17 Conn. 372, 78.

Occum Co. v. Sprague Co., 35 Conn. 496, 15, 23, 296.

O'Connor v. Pittsburgh, 18 Pa. 187,

195.

O'Hara v. Lexington R. R., 1 Dana, 232, 14.

v. Pennsylvania R. R., 25 Pa. 445, 107, 119.

Ohio, etc., R. R. v. Wallace, 14 Pa.

245, 246.

Old Colony R. R. v. Plymouth, 14

Gray, 155, 33, 44, 154. Oliphant v. Commissioners of Atchison County, 18 Kan. 386, ¿? 271, 346. Olmstead v. Camp, 33 Conn. 532, 13, 15.

Omaha R. R. v. Menk, 4 Neb. 21, 2 258.

O'Reiley v. Draining Co., 82 Ind. 169,

82 12, 16.

Oregon R. R. v. Bailey, 3 Oreg. 164, 847.

v. Barlow, 3 Oreg. 311, ¿¿ 90, 92, 163, 220.

v. Oregon Nav. Co., 3 Oreg. 178, 22 105, 251, 259.

Orr v. Quimby, 54 N. H. 590, ¿¿ 21, 126, 127, 347.

Osborn v. Hart, 24 Wis. 89, 26. Overman v. May, 35 Iowa, 89, %% 51, 52.

Owen v. Jordan, 27 Ala. 608, ?? 250, 255.

Owners v. Mayor of Albany, 15 Wend. 374, 82 98, 157.

Pace v. Freeman, 10 Ired. 103, § 305.
Pacific R. R. v.
Chrystal, 25 Mo. 544,

28 152, 162.

v. Leavenworth, 1 Dill. 393,

204.

Page v. Boston, 106 Mass. 84, 197.

v. Chicago R. R., 70 Ill. 324, ?? 149, 151, 167.

v. Heineberg, 40 Vt. 81, 110. Paine v. Boston, 4 Allen, 168, 170.

v. Leicester, 22 Vt. 44, ¿ 333.

v. Woods, 108 Mass. 160, 22 294, 300, 301.

Palairet's Appeal, 67 Pa. 479, 8 25. Palmer v. The State, Wright (Ohio), 364, 14.

Palmer Co. v. Ferrill, 17 Pick. 58, ??
298, 299, 300, 322.
Palmyra v. Morton, 25 Mo. 593, 149.
Panton Turnpike v. Bishop, 11 Vt. 198,

34.

Parham v. Justices, 9 Ga. 341, 83 4, 10, 89, 128, 315.

Paris v. Mason, 37 Texas, 447, ¿? 90, 149.

Parish v. Gilmanton, 11 N. H. 293, ¿? 97, 101, 103.

Parke's Appeal, 64 Pa. 137, § 62. Parker v. Boston R. R., 3 Cush. 107, 22 31, 183, 185, 207, 326.

v. Cutler Milldam, 20 Me. 353, 78.

Parker, petitioner, 36 N. H. 84, 103. Parks v. Boston, 8 Pick. 218, 224, 333; 15 Pick. 198, 22 65, 69.

v. Hampden, 120 Mass. 395, 153. v. Wisconsin R. R., 33 Wis. 413, ¿? 165, 166.

Parmelee v. Oswego R. R., 7 Barb. 599, 8 40.

Parnell v. Commissioners, 84 Ala. 278, 269.

Parrot v. Cincinnati R. R., 10 Ohio

St. 624, 193, 200.
Parsons v. Howe, 41 Me. 218, § 128.

Parsons v. Pettingell, 11 Allen, 507, § 5. Paschall St. (In re), 81 Pa. 118, 91. Passmore v. Philadelphia R. R., Phila. (C. P.), 2 65.

Patchen v. Morrison, 3 Vt. 590, 286. Patchin v. Brooklyn, 2 Wend. 377, ??

254, 281.

Patrick v. Commissioners, 4 McCord, 541, 8 1.

Patten's Petition, 16 N. H. 277, § 241. Patten v. Northern Central R. R., 33 Pa. 426, 166, 193.

Patterson v. Baumer, 43 Iowa, 477, 8 356.

v. Boom Co., 3 Dill. 465, 21, 168, 170, 173, 174, 349.

v. Boston, 20 Pick. 159, 82 69, 70, 192; 23 Pick. 425, 28 70, 192. v. Chicago R. R., 75 Ill. 588, 8 194, 203.

Paul v. Detroit, 32 Mich. 108, ¿? 26, 49, 85, 91, 255, 256.

Payne v. Taylor, 3 A. K. Marsh. 328, € 288.

284.

Peabody v. Sweet, 3 Ind. 514, 95.
Pearce v. Gilmer, 54 Ill. 25,
Pearl St. (Matter of), 19 Wend. 651,

[blocks in formation]

Winkel, 77 Ill. 56, § 199. Pell v. Northampton Rail. Co., L. R. 2

Peninsular R. W. v. Howard, 20 Mich. 18, 249.

Pennsylvania Canal v. Hill, 6 W. N. C., No. 14 (Pa.), ¿ 32. Pennsylvania R. R. v. Bruner, 55 Pa. 318, 22 115, 119.

v. Bunnell, 81 Pa. 414, 88 159,
168, 170.

v. Heister, 8 Pa. 445, § 246.
v. Keiffer, 22 Pa. 356, § 237, 338.
v. Lutheran Congregation, 53 Pa.
445, 88 234, 246.

v. New York R. R., 23 N. J.
Eq. 157, 8 351.

v. Porter, 29 Pa. 165, 33 115, 243. Penny (In re), 7 El. & Bl. 660, ?? 182, 333.

v. Penny, 37 L. J. (Ch.) 340, ?? 168, 333.

v. South-Eastern Rail. Co., 26 L. J. (Q. B.) 225, 333. Penrice v. Wallis, 37 Miss. 172, ¿¿ 127, 151.

People (The) v. Board of Spring Wells, 12 Mich. 434, 283.

- v. Board of Supervisors, 20 Mich.
95, 318.

v. Bowen, 30 Barb. 24, 8 55.
v. Brighton, 20 Mich. 57, § 275.
v. Brooklyn, 1 Wend. 318, 312.
v. Burton, 65 N. Y. 452, 88 97,

333.

v. Canal Appraisers, 33 N. Y. 461, 80.

v. Canal Board, 7 Lans. 220, ¿ 333.

v. Collins, 19 Wend. 56, 8 322. -v. Commissioners of Greenbush, 24 Wend. 367, 8 324.

v. Commissioners of Highways, 57 N. Y. 549, 121; 1 N. Y. Sup. Ct. 193, 318.

v. Commissioners of Milton, 37 N. Y. 360, 280.

v. Commissioners of Nankin, 14 Mich. 528, 101.

v. Commissioners of Palatine, 53 Barb. 70, 351.

v. Cortelyou, 36 Barb. 164, ??

People (The) v. Eldredge, 10 N. Y.
Sup. Ct. 541, 52.

v. Ferris, 41 Barb. 121, & 242.
v. First Judge, 2 Hill, 398, ??
251, 333.

v. Goodwin, 5 N. Y. 568, 111.
v. Griswold, 2 N. Y. Sup. Ct.
351,318; 67 N. Y. 59, 3 318.
v. Haines, 49 N. Y. 587, § 357.
v. Hawley, 3 Mich. 330, 8.
v. Hayden, 6 Hill, 359, 124.
บ. Hynds, 30 N. Y. 470, ? 230.
v. Judges Dutchess County, 23
Wend. 360,

121.

v. Kerr, 27 N. Y. 188, 33 51, 202,
203, 205; 38 Barb. 369, 51.
v. Kingman, 24 N. Y. 559, ¿? 81,
121, 279, 322.

v. Kniskern, 54 N. Y. 52, 3 95.
v. La Grange, 2 Mich. 187, 22 98,
145, 175.

-v. Lake Co., 33 Cal. 487, 22 85, 331.

v. Lawrence, 54 Barb. 589, 22 57,
333.

v. Lowell, 9 Mich. 144, 145.
v. Mayor of Brooklyn, 4 N. Y.
419, ¿ 2.

v. McNeil, 2 N. Y. Sup. Ct. 140,
281.

v. McRoberts, 62 Ill. 38, 22 91,
136, 338.

v. Michigan Southern R. R.,
Mich. 496, 144.

3

v. Mott, 9 N. Y. Sup. Ct. 672, 238.

v. Murray, 5 Hill, 468, § 326.

v. Nearing, 27 N. Y. 306, 8 128, 357.

v. New York R. R., 45 Barb. 73, ¿¿ 47, 59.

v. Osborn, 20 Wend. 186, 97. v. Robinson, 29 Barb. 77, 22 65,

67.

v. Scio, 3 Mich. 121, 145.

v. Smith, 21 N. Y. 595, 28 84, 91. v. Stewart, 41 Barb. 121, 242. v. Supervisors, 4 Barb. 64, 93. v. Supervisors, 19 Wend. 102,

[blocks in formation]

Peoria v. Kidder, 26 Ill. 351, 8 149.
Peoria R. R. v. Birkett, 62 Ill. 332,

?? 164, 180, 212, 219, 244, 257.
v. Bryant, 57 Ill. 473, 88 161, 185,
314.

v. Laurie, 63 Ill. 264, 161.
v. Railroad, 66 Пl. 174, 28 41, 47,
130.

v. Rice, 75 Ill. 329, § 67.

v. Schertz, 84 Ill. 135, 90.

v. Warner, 61 Ill. 52, % 95, 96. Perley v. Chandler, 6 Mass. 454,

56.

- v. Railroad, 57 N. H. 212, 8 216. Perrine v. Farr, 22 N. J. L. 356, ¿ 27. Perry v. Sherborn, 11 Cush. 388, ?? 255, 318.

v. Webb, 21 La. An. 247, 29.
v. Worcester, 6 Gray, 544, 22 87,
220.

Peters v. Mayor, 15 N. Y. Sup. Ct. 405, 223.

Peterson v. Fereby, 30 Iowa, 327, 8

137.

Pettibone v. Lacrosse R. R., 14 Wis. 443, 142. Pettigrew v. Evansville, 25 Wis. 223, 80.

Pettis v. Providence, 11 R. I. 372, 88

Pfeifer v. Sheboygan R. R., 18 Wis.

155, 144.

73.

Pfleger (Re), L. R. 6 Eq. 426, Phifer v. Carolina R. R., 72 N. C. 433, @126.

-V. Cox, 21 Ohio St. 248, 53. Philadelphia v. Dyer, 41 Pa. 463, ?? 76, 175.

Whart. 25, 200, 202. — v. Scott, 81 Pa. 80, ¿ 82. Philadelphia R. R. v. Johnson, 2 v. Philadelphia, 9 Phila. 563, ¿? 33, 45.

- v. Trimble, 4 Whart. 47, 8 215.
v. Williams, 54 Pa. 103, 22 31,
59, 65.

―v. Yeiser, 8 Pa. 366, 163. Philadelphia & Trenton R. R., 6

Whart. 275, 336.

Philips's Trusts (Re), L. R. 6 Eq. 250, 73.

Phillips v. Dunkirk R. R., 78 Pa. 177, 23 51, 202.

v. Pease, 39 Cal. 582, 2 175. Pick v. Rubicon Co., 27 Wis. 433, ?? 293, 306.

Pickert v. Ridgefield Park R. R., 25

N. J. Eq. 316, 76.

Pickford v. Lynn, 98 Mass. 491, ?? 104, 268.

Pierce v. Somersworth, 10 N. H. 369, 8 49.

v. Worcester R. R., 105 Mass. 199, 163.

Pierpoint v. Harrisville, 9 W. Va. 215, 90.

Pinchin v. London & Blackwall Rail.

Co., 5 De G. M. & G. 851, 30. Pine Grove v. Talcott, 19 Wall. 666,

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Platt v. Bright, 29 N. J. Eq. 128,
65, 74.

Plum v. Morris Canal Co., 10 N. J.
Eq. 256, 195.
Plummer v. Sturtevant, 32 Me. 325,
285.

Plymouth v. County Commissioners, 16 Gray, 341, & 230.

Plymouth Road, 5 Rawle, 150, 236. Plympton v. Woburn, 11 Gray, 415, 180.

Pocopson Road, 16 Pa. 15, ¿ 275. Point No-Point Road, 2 Serg. & R. 277, & 330.

Polack v. Trustees, 48 Cal. 490, ¿¿ 202, 318.

Pollard's Lessee v. Hagan, 3 How. 212, 8 347.

Pollard v. Ferguson, 1 Litt. 196, ?? 228, 241.

v. Moore, 51 N. H. 188, 22 309, 312.

Polly v. Saratoga R. R., 9 Barb. 449, 28 36, 97, 98.

Pomeroy v. Chicago R. R., 25 Wis. 641, 28 66, 90.

v. Milwaukee R. R., 16 Wis. 640, 8 204.

Porter v. North Missouri R. R., 33 Mo. 128, ¿ 200. Portland R. R. v. Commissioners of York County, 65 Me. 292, § 115. Post v. Logan, 1 N. Y. Leg. Obs. 59, 2 69.

Poston v. Terry, 5 J. J. Marsh. 220, ¡¡ 77, 275.

Potter v. Ames, 43 Cal. 75, 82 88, 340. Potts's Appeal, 15 Pa. 414, ¿? 119, 241.

Pottstown Gas Co. v. Murphy, 39 Pa.

257, 182.

Poughkeepsie R. R. (In re), 63 Barb.

151, 179.

Powell v. Sammons, 31 Ala. 552, & 85. Powers' Appeal, 29 Mich. 504, q? 11,

275.

Powers v. Armstrong, 19 Ga. 427, 131.

v. Bears, 12 Wis. 213, 22 15, 85, 126, 130.

v. Bergen, 6 N. Y. 358, ¿ 25. — v. Hurmert, 51 Mo. 136, § 332. Prather v. Ellison, 10 Ohio, 396, 53. v. Jeffersonville R. R., 52 Ind. 16, 58.

Presbrey v. Old Colony R. R., 103

Mass. 1, 2 166, 167, 170, 213. President v. Givens, 17 Ill. 255, ? 161. President, etc., of Brooklyn v. Patchen, 8 Wend. 47, 8 48. Preston v. Dubuque R. R., 11 Iowa, 15, 210.

Pritchard v. Atkinson, 3 N. H. 335, ? 270.

Proprietors of Locks v. Lowell, 7

Gray, 223, 38 40, 46.

v. Nashua R. R., 104 Mass. 1, 2 57; 10 Cush. 385, 22 75, 182, 183, 185, 186, 191, 193, 220. Prospect Park R. R. (Matter of), 67 N. Y. 371, 58, 108; 15 N. Y. Sup. Ct. 30, 134. Prosser v. Wapello County, 18 Iowa, 327, 88 35, 165.

Protzman v. Indianapolis R. R., 9 Ind.

467, 88 59, 206.

Proud v. Bates, 34 L. J. (Ch.) 406, %

52.

Provolt v. Chicago R. R., 57 Mo. 256, 22 181, 140, 141.

Public Highway (Matter of), 22 N. J.
L. 293, 125.
Pulling v. London,' Chatham, etc.,

Rail. Co., 4 N. R. 45, 386; 33 L.
J. (Ch.) 505, 120.
Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co., 13 Wall.
166, ¿? 30, 80.

Purdy v. Martin, 31 Mich. 455, ? 101. Pusey's Appeal, 83 Pa. 67, ¿ 91.

Pusey v. Wright, 31 Pa. 387, & 113. Putnam v. Douglas County, 6 Oreg. 828, 151, 159.

Quayles v. Missouri R. R., 63 Mo. 465, 8 230.

Quimby v. Vermont Central R. R., 23 Vt. 387, 22 49, 212.

Quincy R. R. v. Kellogg, 54 Mo. 334, 88 115, 261.

v. Ridge, 57 Mo. 599, ¿? 152, 243. -v. Taylor, 43 Mo. 35, & 100.

Radcliff's Executors v. Mayor of Brooklyn, 4 N. Y. 195, ¿ 195. Rader v. Township of Union, 39 N. J. L. 509, 48. Railroad Co. v. Boyer, 13 Pa. 497, § 73. v. Bucher, 7 Watts, 33, § 73. v. Chappell, Rice. 383, § 14. v. Gesner, 20 Pa. 240, ? 175. v. Gilson, 8 Watts, 243, 152. v. Halstead, 7 W. Va. 301, 2 112, 135.

v. Leavenworth, 1 Dill. 393, § 202. v. Schurmeir, 7 Wall. 272, ¿? 82, 79.

v. Tyree, 7 W. Va. 693, ?? 152, 153, 158.

Raleigh R. R. v. Davis, 2 Dev. & B. 451, 22 1, 14, 50, 91, 124.

v. Wicker, 74 N. C. 220, ? 158, 162, 166, 189, 193, 212. Ramsden v. Manchester Rail. Co, 12 Jur. 293, § 30.

Rand v. Newton, 6 Allen, 38, 169. Ranken v. East and West India Docks

Rail. Co., 12 Beav. 298, 74. Raphael v. Thames Valley Rail. Co., 36 L. J. (Ch.) 209; 2 Ch. App. 147, & 113.

Ray v. Atchison R. R., 4 Neb. 439, 8 130.

Read v. Leeds, 19 Conn. 182, 56.

v. Victoria Rail. Co., 1 N. R. 446; 32 L. J. (Ex.) 167, 160. Readington v. Dilley, 24 N. J. L. 209, 22 86, 166, 249, 251, 252. Reckner v. Warner, 22 Ohio St. 275, ¿¿ 91, 340.

« PreviousContinue »