U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION FY 1970 BUDGET ESTIMATES Appropriation - Plant and Capital Equipment WEAPONS -PLANT AND CAPITAL EQUIPMENT OBLIGATIONS Obligations for the Weapons Program for FY 1970 are estimated at $119,681,000 of which: $38,250,000 is for the construction projects justified in Section A below, requested for authorization in the proposed FY 1970 Authorization Act or were previously authorized and for which a request for appropriation is being made in FY 1970. $81,431,000 is for Capital Equipment Not Related to Construction justified in Section B below, requested for authorization in the proposed FY 1970 Authorization Act. SECTION A - Obligations for Construction Projects: The projects comprising Section A, which are requested for authorization in FY 1970 or which were previously authorized and for 1. Project 70-3-a Weapons production, development and test installations $10,000,000 This project provides for the construction and acquisition of such additional production, development, and test facilities or sites as may be required to assure the continuity of production, research, and test operations. Neither the need nor the scope and nature of these requirements can be foreseen in sufficient detail to include them as separate budget projects. Prior WEAPONS PROGRAM continued The magnitude and complexity of current experience has proven the inestimable value of this type of project authorization. and proposed production, development, and test programs indicate that we may expect requirements on short notice to provide development and/or production plant capabilities needed to meet new requirements and to assure the highest level of safety in daily operations. Details of Cost Estimate The indefinite nature of the anticipated work precludes inclusion of details of cost. $ 15,250,000 $315,000,000 This project was previously approved at an estimated cost of $285,000,000. The increase of $30,000,000 in the total estimated cost of the project is based upon more complete product definitions which have resulted in better and more advanced engineering FY 1971. Details of Cost Estimate: &. b. Engineering, design and inspection averages 13.7% of construction costs, Item b Construction costs (1) (2) Improvements to land Buildings (a) New buildings and/or additions (b) Building modifications (3) Other structures The FY 1970 appropriation request for this project totals $13,000,000. The FY 1970 estimate of $81,431,000 provides for capital equipment additions, improvements, and replacementa necessary for the development, test, production and surveillance of nuclear weapons required to meet military needs. Additional information of a classified nature is presented on the following classified pages W-23 through W-36. General GILLER. With the chairman's permission I would like to discuss the general weapons program without reference to dollars for a few moments to put it into sight and scope. Then we can talk about the actual dollars involved in the program in the latter part. Mr. WHITTEN. Please proceed. General GILLER. As I am sure the committee is aware, the AEC is responsible for the research, development, test, and manufacture of all nuclear weapons used by the Department of Defense. The devices that the Department of Defense orders from us are the result of a mutually agreeable system in which we tell them what is possible for us to manufacture and they check their requirements, and those that match they decide wether they want to order. There is an organization called the Military Liaison Committee, which is the interface between the Atomic Energy Commission and the Department of Defense insofar as weapons matters are concerned. That is a formal mechanism that reviews these. WEAPONS COMPLEX the For the benefit of those who perhaps are not completely aware of the nuclear weapons side of the AEC, my first chart shows you so-called weapons complex. (See map, p. 173.) In this chart there are 15 major installations which support the weapons program. They are AEC owned but contractor operated. We have contracts with many companies and the University of California. Mr. WHITTEN. Cost plus or negotiated? General GILLER. I understand it is a cost plus fixed fee. The cost is budgeted as if it were a Government laboratory in every sense of the word. On the chart you will see from the red circles the three laboratories-Livermore, Los Alamos, and Sandia. Richland is a small lab doing little work for this program. Sandia has an organization both at Albuquerque and Livermore and they are the weaponeers. They do the mechanical and electrical portions of the weapons. Where it says "STS" and "NTS", we have two triangles in Nevada. Those are the NTS, Nevada test site, and STS is supplemental test site. STS is also at Amchitka. When the weapons are designed and engineered they are transferred to the organization which is indicated by the black squares. These are the manufacturing portion of the Commission's activity. It takes all eight of those black squares to make a single weapon. We specialize in specific parts at a specific plant. This is Rocky Flats where we had the fire, and this is where we do the plutonium work. Rocky Flats therefore, is a single-purpose plant. So are the others. Kansas City, for example, is where our electronics work is performed. There are approximately 37,000 contract employees in the production complex. The value of that complex is greater than about $1.7 billion. |