Interoperability of U.S. and NATO Allied Air Forces: Supporting Data and Case Studies, Issue 1603

Front Cover
Rand Corporation, 2003 - History - 111 pages
The United States is increasingly participating in coalition military operations. Coalition support may be required for successful military operations and in most such operations the United States desires to share the burden. U.S. allies recognize the increased security that coalition operations can bring. Because interoperability is a key element in coalitions, RAND undertook research to help the Air Force identify potential interoperability problems that may arise in coalition air operations and to suggest nonmateriel and technology-based solutions. The research focus is on command, control, communications, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C3ISR) systems in out-of-NATO-area operations. The authors' review of recent coalition air operations found that interoperability problems arose because of differences in doctrine, incompatible communications, different planning and execution systems, and different weapon system capabilities. For example, allies may lack sufficient all-weather, day and night precision-guided weapons. The authors suggest the following to increase interoperability in coalition operations: (1) common or harmonized doctrine for combined joint task force operations, from planning through assessment, (2) compatible or adaptable concepts of operation for airborne surveillance and control, (3) common information-sharing standards and compatible tactical communication systems, and (4) expert, experienced personnel who understand the capabilities of coalition partners. From a technology perspective and cost considerations, C3ISR initiatives appear to offer the best opportunities for interoperability enhancements.
 

Contents

1 Introduction
xxi
2 An Overview of Recent US Coalition Experience
xxiv
Several Large and Very Complex Operations
1
With Which NATO Allies Is Interoperability Required?
2
Summary Observations
5
For What Capabilities and Services Is Interoperability Required?
7
Patterns in the Breadth of the Contributions
12
For What Types of Missions Is Interoperability Required?
14
Operational Level
30
Capability Shortfalls and Performance Deficiencies
31
Issues in NATO Operational Planning for Air
32
Information Overload
33
Exercises and Training
34
Technological Level
35
Conclusions
37
Afterword on Operation ALLIED FORCE OAF
39

Conclusions
16
3 Lessons Learned in Some Recent Coalition Operations
18
Overview
19
Unity of Purpose Effort and Command
22
Flexible Command Structures
24
Tensions Between Political and Military Requirements
25
Other StrategicLevel Issues
27
4 Conclusions
42
Appendix
45
B NATO Contributions to Recent US Coalition Operations
49
C Analysis of Missions Flown
79
D Base Access
92
Bibliography
100
Copyright

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page xxi - Interoperability: The ability of systems, units, or forces to provide services to and accept services from other systems, units, or forces, and use of the services so exchanged to enable them to operate effectively together.

References to this book

Bibliographic information