Why History is an introduction to the issue of history and ethics. Designed to provoke discussion, the book asks whether a good knowledge and understanding of the past is a good thing to have and if so, why. In the context of postmodern times, Why History suggests that the goal of 'learning lessons from the past' is actually learning lessons from stories written by historians and others. If the past as history has no foundation, can anything ethical be gained from history?
Why History presents liberating challenges to history and ethics, proposing that we have reached an emancipatory moment which is well beyond the 'end of history'.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Accordingly actually anti-foundationalism arguably argues argument Baudrillard binary oppositions choice closure concept Consequently constitute context contingent course critique culture decision deconstruction Derrida differend discourse emancipatory end of history epistemological Ermarth Evans Evans's existence fact fiction Frank Ankersmit future genre Geoffrey Elton Hayden White historians historical narrative historical writing historicised historiography history and ethics Ibid idea ideological illusion imaginaries imagined intellectual interminable irreducible Jacques Derrida Jean Baudrillard kind language linear live logic London lower case history Lyotard meaning metanarratives metaphor metaphysical modern modernist moral moral relativism narrative interpretations narrative substances nature never notion objectivity past philosophy of history phrase political position possible postmodern postmodernists precisely proper question radical reality recognise refer relativism relativistic rhetoric rhythmic Richard Rorty Rorty's Routledge scepticism sense statements sublime teleology temporality theory things tion Tropology truth undecidability University Press whilst White and Ankersmit