The Supreme Court Reporter, Volume 35West Publishing Company, 1915 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 232
... JUSTICE OLIVER WENDELL HOLMES , of Massachusetts . Appointed De cember 4 , 1902 , by President Roosevelt . SECOND CIRCUIT . Comprising Connecticut , New York , and Vermont . JUSTICE CHARLES E. HUGHES , of New York . Appointed May 2 ...
... JUSTICE OLIVER WENDELL HOLMES , of Massachusetts . Appointed De cember 4 , 1902 , by President Roosevelt . SECOND CIRCUIT . Comprising Connecticut , New York , and Vermont . JUSTICE CHARLES E. HUGHES , of New York . Appointed May 2 ...
Page 11
... Justice Lurton , then a judge of the circuit court of appeals , and ex- hibits the usual care and ability of that learned justice . He enumerates the conten- tions of the parties , the elements of the contentions , compares and weighs ...
... Justice Lurton , then a judge of the circuit court of appeals , and ex- hibits the usual care and ability of that learned justice . He enumerates the conten- tions of the parties , the elements of the contentions , compares and weighs ...
Page 14
... Justice Day took no part in the consideration and decision of this case . ( 235 U. S. 31 ) CHARLES OVERTON , Plff . in Err . , V. STATE OF OKLAHOMA . COURTS ( § 391 * ) - ERROR TO STATE COURT FRIVOLOUSNESS OF FEDERAL QUESTION ...
... Justice Day took no part in the consideration and decision of this case . ( 235 U. S. 31 ) CHARLES OVERTON , Plff . in Err . , V. STATE OF OKLAHOMA . COURTS ( § 391 * ) - ERROR TO STATE COURT FRIVOLOUSNESS OF FEDERAL QUESTION ...
Page 16
... Justice McReynolds took no part in the consideration and decision of this case . ( 235 U. S. 55 ) UNITED STATES V. JULIUS M. MAYER , Judge of the District Court of the United States for the South- ern District of New York . Courts ...
... Justice McReynolds took no part in the consideration and decision of this case . ( 235 U. S. 55 ) UNITED STATES V. JULIUS M. MAYER , Judge of the District Court of the United States for the South- ern District of New York . Courts ...
Page 21
... Justice McReynolds took no part in the consideration and decision of this case . ( 235 U. S. 50 ) CLEVELAND & PITTSBURGH RAIL- ROAD COMPANY , Pennsylvania Com- pany , the Cleveland , Cincinnati , Chicago , & St. Louis Railway Company ...
... Justice McReynolds took no part in the consideration and decision of this case . ( 235 U. S. 50 ) CLEVELAND & PITTSBURGH RAIL- ROAD COMPANY , Pennsylvania Com- pany , the Cleveland , Cincinnati , Chicago , & St. Louis Railway Company ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
14th Amendment 36 Stat action affirmed alleged allotment appellee applied authority banking board bankruptcy bill carrier cars Cent chap charge circuit court claim coal Commission commissioner common carrier Comp complainant Congress Constitution contract corporation County court of appeals creditors Creek damages Decided decision decree defendant in error demurrer depositors Digs district court employee enforce ex rel facts Federal filed films fund grant held Indian interstate commerce Interstate Commerce Commission judgment jurisdiction jury Justice lands legislation ment Messrs Note.-For NUMBER in Dec Ohio Oklahoma operation pany parties Pennsylvania Company person petition petitioner plaintiff in error Plff proceedings provisions Pullman Company purpose question railroad company railway company reasonable regulation Rep'r Indexes rule shipper statute suit Supreme Court tained tion traffic transportation trustee United States Circuit Writ of Certiorari writ of error York
Popular passages
Page 373 - That it shall be unlawful for any common carrier subject to the provisions of this act to make or give any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to any particular person, company, firm, corporation, or locality, or any particular description of traffic, in any respect whatsoever...
Page 495 - Act; nor shall any carrier charge or demand or collect or receive a greater or less or different compensation for such transportation of passengers or property, or for any service in connection therewith, between the points named in such tariffs than the rates, fares, and charges which are specified in the tariff filed and in effect at the time...
Page 178 - ... in pursuance of an appropriation by law ; nor unless such payment be made within two years next after the passage of such appropriation act ; and every such law making a new appropriation, or continuing or reviving an appropriation, shall distinctly specify the sum appropriated, and the object to which it is to be applied ; and it shall not be sufficient for such law to refer to any other law to fix such sum.
Page 486 - ... act, matter or thing in this act prohibited or declared to be unlawful...
Page 373 - ... shall include cars and other vehicles and all instrumentalities and facilities of shipment or carriage, irrespective of ownership or of any contract, express or implied, for the use thereof and all services in connection with the receipt, delivery, elevation, and transfer in transit, ventilation, refrigeration or icing, storage, and handling of property transported...
Page 334 - States shall proceed in all respects like other civil suits for damages, except that on the trial of such suit the findings and order of the commission shall be prima facie evidence of the facts therein stated...
Page 254 - But the fact that both parties are of full age and competent to contract does not necessarily deprive the state of the power to interfere, where the parties do not stand upon an equality, or where the public health demands that one party to the contract shall be protected against himself. The state still retains an interest in his welfare, however reckless he may be. The whole is no greater than the sum of all the parts, and when the individual health, safety, and welfare are sacrificed or neglected...
Page 492 - That any contract, rule, regulation, or device whatsoever, the purpose or intent of which shall be to enable any common carrier to exempt itself from any liability created by this Act, shall to that extent be void...
Page 458 - In suits brought for the infringement of letters patent the District courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction, in law or in equity, in the district of which the defendant is an inhabitant, or in any district in which the defendant, whether a person, partnership, or corporation, shall have committed acts of infringement and have a regular and established place of business.
Page 242 - In all such particulars the employer and the employee have equality of right, and any legislation that disturbs that equality is an arbitrary interference with the liberty of contract which no government can legally justify in a free land.