Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1893 - Copyright "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page iii
... Company , ex parte . American Saw Company , ex parte Anderson , ex parte ......... Auchu , ex parte ...... .. B. Backus Portable Steam Heater Company , ex parte ..... Balsley , Scribner and Warner v . Childs v Barnard , Riley v ...
... Company , ex parte . American Saw Company , ex parte Anderson , ex parte ......... Auchu , ex parte ...... .. B. Backus Portable Steam Heater Company , ex parte ..... Balsley , Scribner and Warner v . Childs v Barnard , Riley v ...
Page viii
... Company et al . Brush Electric Company et al . v 632 American Automaton Weighing Machine Company et al . v . Blauvelt ... American Box Machine Company . Crosman et al 455 558 American Electric Construction Company , Limited . Consumers ...
... Company et al . Brush Electric Company et al . v 632 American Automaton Weighing Machine Company et al . v . Blauvelt ... American Box Machine Company . Crosman et al 455 558 American Electric Construction Company , Limited . Consumers ...
Page ix
... Company et al . v . Pullman's Palace Car Company 604 Boyd v . Cherry ... 459 Brickill et al . v . City of Hartford et al . 295 Brickill et al . v . Mayor , etc. , of Baltimore 698 Bromley Brothers Carpet Factory v . Stewart et al . 669 ...
... Company et al . v . Pullman's Palace Car Company 604 Boyd v . Cherry ... 459 Brickill et al . v . City of Hartford et al . 295 Brickill et al . v . Mayor , etc. , of Baltimore 698 Bromley Brothers Carpet Factory v . Stewart et al . 669 ...
Page x
... Company . Whitcomb v . Goodyear Metallic Rubber Shoe Company . Williams et al . v 395 377 279 263 288 341 343 353 , 360 , 364 498 567 648 Goodyear Rubber Company . Hammond Buckle Company v .. Gormully . Pope Manufacturing Company v ...
... Company . Whitcomb v . Goodyear Metallic Rubber Shoe Company . Williams et al . v 395 377 279 263 288 341 343 353 , 360 , 364 498 567 648 Goodyear Rubber Company . Hammond Buckle Company v .. Gormully . Pope Manufacturing Company v ...
Page xi
... Company v Land . Page Woven Wire Fence Company v . Lane v . Park et al ........ Lee et al . v . Northwestern Stove Repair Company et al Lee v . Pillsbury et al ......... . Lippincott Glass Company . Blair et al . v . Loeb . United ...
... Company v Land . Page Woven Wire Fence Company v . Lane v . Park et al ........ Lee et al . v . Northwestern Stove Repair Company et al Lee v . Pillsbury et al ......... . Lippincott Glass Company . Blair et al . v . Loeb . United ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affidavit alleged amendment application for patent April April 9 assignment Barnard bill cation circuit court combination Company complainant complainant's construction court of equity covered Decided decision decree defendant defendant's demurrer denied described device division divisional application earlier application electric entitled equity evidence Examiner of Interferences fact February 26 filed flange follows granted held improvement infringement injunction interfer interference issue interference proceedings interlocutory interlocutory decree inventor January Letters Patent license machine manufacture matter mechanism ment Messrs metal motion November 17 operation original party Patent Office petition plaintiff plate Poinier POPE MANUFACTURING COMPANY preliminary statement present application Primary Examiner prior prior art priority of invention proof proper purpose question reason reduction to practice reference reissue rejected Rule shown SIMONDS specification springs stem-arbor subject-matter substantially suit Supreme Court testimony thereof tion Trade-Mark U. S. Circuit United wire words
Popular passages
Page 7 - That in the construction of this act, the words "engraving," 20 "cut" and "print" shall be applied only to pictorial illustrations or works connected with the fine arts, and no prints or labels designed to be used for any other articles of manufacture shall be entered under the copyright law, but may be registered in the Patent Office.
Page 243 - Inventor or discoverer of the art. machine, manufacture," composition or improvement for which he solicits a patent ; that he does not know and does not believe that the same was ever known or used before his invention or discovery thereof, and shall state of what country he is a citizen...
Page 476 - That whenever, by mistake, accident, or inadvertence, and without any wilful default or intent to defraud or mislead the public, any patentee shall have in his specification claimed to be the original and first inventor or discoverer...
Page 385 - But no such disclaimer shall affect any action pending at the time of its being filed , except so far as may relate to the question of unreasonable neglect or delay in filing the same.
Page 384 - Whenever, through inadvertence, accident, or mistake. and without any fraudulent or deceptive intention, a patentee has claimed more than that of which he was the original or first inventor or discoverer, his patent shall be valid for all that part which is truly and justly his own...
Page 207 - ... either in the identical form or in any such near resemblance thereto as may be .calculated to deceive, and that the fac-simile or counterparts filed therewith are true and correct.
Page 222 - any person who has invented or discovered any new and useful art, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, not known or used by others in this country before his invention or discovery thereof...
Page 696 - that the laws of the several States, except where the Constitution, treaties, or statutes of the United States shall otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as rules of decision in trials at common law in the courts of the United States, in cases where they apply.
Page 343 - And the said party of the second part agrees to pay to the party of the first part the rent as above stated, except when said premises are untenantable by reason of fire, or from any other cause than the carelessness of the party of the second part, or persons family, or in employ, or by superior force and inevitable necessity.
Page 456 - It is a property right, for the violation of which, damages may be recovered in an action at law, and the continued violation of it will be enjoined by a court of equity, with compensation for past infringement. This...