Page images
PDF
EPUB

Mr. URBAN,

May 1. TORTON, in Leicestershire, (five

N miles from Market Bosworth,

seven from Atherston, 12 from Hinckley, and 16 from Leicester,) commonly distinguished by the name of Nerton juxta Twycross, is also called sometimes Hog's Norton, (as the common saying is thereabout,) "where pigs play o' th' organs;" which adage, says Sir Thomas Cave, might come upon this occasion: "Looking for antiquities about this church, I found in a corner an old piece of a pair of organs, upon the end of every key whereof there was a boar cut; the Earls of Oxford (by Trussell) sometime being owners of land here."

This town was given by King Eldred, in 951, to Elleth, his servant; and in Domesday Book is thus noticed :

"Six ploughlands in Nortone, which in the reign of the Confessor had been valued at five shillings, were worth six shillings at the general survey, when they had been held by the countess Godeva. The land was equal to seven ploughs. Three were employed in the demesne; and a priest, with one villan and two bordars, had one plough. There were eight acres of meadow."

This manor was the antient inheritance of the Griesleys, of Castle Griesley and Drakelowe, in the county of Derby, held by grant of the Earl Ferrars. They gave land in this manor to the Abbey of Merevale, in Warwickshire, and to the Nunnery of Polesworth, in the neighbourhood.

This parish was inclosed in 1749, 'when it appears that the King was seised of the perpetual advowson; Charles Jennens, esq. was lord of the manor; John Clayton was rector; and Sir Thomas Abney, bart. Henry Vernon, esq. and others, were freeholders and land-owners in the said manor; which contained about 1,744 acres, 377 acres of which, being heaths, wastes, and common grounds, had been of little

value.

Sir John Moore*, Lord Mayor of London in 1681, was born here; as was also the Rev. William Whistont,

*See an account and portrait of him in Harding's Biographical Memoir, II. 25. + For a portrait and ample memoirs of Mr. Whiston, see Nichols's "Literary Anecdotes," vol. 1. p. 494; or "History of Leicestershire," vol. IV. p. *854.

GENT. MAG. June, 1813.

"a Divine of very uncommon parts, and more uncommon learning, but of a singular and extraordinary charac ter," whose father was rector here from 1661 till 1685.

By the Return in 1811, it appears that Norton contains 2 houses building, 2 uninhabited, and 60 houses foc cupied by 62 families (44 of whom were chiefly employed in agriculture, and 15 in trade, &c.) consisting of 125 males and 164 females-total 289.

The Church (See Plate I.), dedicated to the Holy Trinity, consists of a tower, in which are three bells, a nave, chancel, and South porch. In 1534, the rectory was worth 117. In 1650, it was returned worth 701.; and its present value in the King's books is The present rector is the Rev. William Casson.

147.

[blocks in formation]

Mr. URBAN,

S

June 1.

you have hitherto furnished us with no biographical account of the late Mr. Malone; and have mere

ly extracted from one of the newspa pers a slight sketch of his character, written certainly by a kind and friendly hand, but containing no particulars of his life; your readers may perhaps derive some gratification from the following brief memorial of this accomplished writer and most truly amiable man. His high literary estimation would alone demand that his name should not be passed over in silence; and the qualities of his heart would render it doubly inexcusable if such a neglect were to be shewn towards one who was himself remarkable for the warmth and steadiness of his attachments; whose love for those whom he valued was never buried in their grave, but who was ready at all times, when the case required it, to protect their fame, and record their virtues; and whose last literary production was an affectionate tribute to the memory of his illustrious friend Mr. Wiudham.

Mr. Malone was descended from an Irish family of the highest antiquity*;

*This is not the place to enlarge upon Mr. Malone's family; but a detailed account of it is to be found in the 7th volume

and all his immediate predecessors were distinguished men. His grandfather, while he was yet only a student at the Temple, was entrusted with a negociation in Holland; and so successfully acquitted himself, that he was honoured and rewarded by King William for his services. Having been called to the Irish bar about 1700, he became one of the most eminent barristers that have ever appeared in that country. His professional fame has only been eclipsed by that of his eldest son, the still more celebrated Anthony Malone, whose superiority has not, however, been universally acknowledged. To any one, who is even slightly acquainted with the history of Ireland, it would be superfluous to point out the extraordinary qualities which adorned the character of Anthony Malone. As a lawyer, an orator, and an able and upright statesman, he was confessedly one of the most illustrious men that his country has produced. Edmond, the second son of Richard, and the father of the late Mr. Malone, was born on the 16th of April, 1704. He was called to the English bar in 1730, where he continued for ten years to practise ; and, in 1740, removed to the Irish bar. After having sat in several parliaments, and gone through the usual gradations of professional rank, he was raised, in 1766, to the dignity of one of the Judges of the Court of Common Pleas in Ireland, an office which he filled till his death in 1774. He married, in 1736, Catherine, only daughter and heir of Benjamin Collier, esq. of Ruckholts, in the county of Essex, by whom he had four sons, Richard, now Lord Sunderlin; Edmond, the subject of our present Memoir; Anthony and Benjamin, who died in their infancy; and two daughters, Henrietta and Catherine.

Edmond Malone was born at his father's house in Dublin, on the 4th of October, 1741. He was educated at the school of Dr. Ford, in Molesworth-street; and went from thence, in the year 1756, to the University of Dublin, where he took the degree of Batchelor of Arts. Here his talents

volume of Archdall's Peerage of Ireland, which, it is believed, was drawn up by Mr. Malone himself, and which contains a full and interesting delineation of his grandfather and uncle.

very early displayed themselves; and, to use the words of a most respectable gentleman, his contemporary, "He was distinguished by a successful competition for academical honours with several young men, who afterwards became the ornaments of the Irish Senate and Bar." It appears that at his outset he had laid down to himself those rules of study to which he ever afterwards steadily adhered. His pursuits were various, but they were not desultory. He was anxious for general information, as far as it could be accurately obtained; but had no value for that superficial smattering which fills the world with brisk and empty talkers. When sitting down to the perusal of any work, either antient or modern, his attention was drawn to its chronology, the history and character of its author, the feelings and prejudices of the times in which he lived; and any other collateral information which might tend to illustrate his writings, or acquaint us with his probable views, and cast of thinking. In later years he was more particularly engrossed by the literature of his own country; but the knowledge he had acquired in his youth had been too assiduously collected, and too firmly fixed in his mind, not to retain possession of his memory, and preserve that purity and elegance of taste which is rarely to be met with but in those who have early derived it from the models of classical antiquity. He appears frequently at this period, in common with some of his accomplished contemporaries, to have amused himself with slight poetical compositions; and on the marriage of their present Majesties contributed an Ode to the collection of congratulatory verses which issued on that event from the University of Dublin. In 1763 he became a student in the Inner Temple; and in 1767 was called to the Irish bar. It might naturally have been expected that the example of his distinguished relatives, et pater Eneas et avunculus Hector, would have stimulated him to pursue the same career in which they had been so honourably successful; and that he would have attained to the highest rank in a profession for which he was so admirably fitted by his natural acuteness and steady habits of application; and accordingly, at his first appearance in the Courts, he

Mr. Steevens having published a second edition of his Shakspeare, in 1778; Mr. Malone, in 1780, added two supplementary volumes, which contained some additional notes, Shakspeare's poems, and seven plays which have been ascribed to him. There appears up to this time to have been no interruption to their friendship; but, on the contrary, Mr. Steevens, having formed a design of relinquishing all future editorial labours, most liberally made a present to Mr. Malone of his valuable collection of old plays, declaring that he himself was now become "a dowager commentator." It is painful to think that this harmony should ever have been disturbed, or that any thing should have created any variance between two such men, who were so well qua lified to co-operate for the benefit of the literary world. Mr. Malone, having continued his researches into all the topicks which might serve to illustrate our great Dramatist, discovered, that although much had been done, yet that much still remained for critical industry; and that a still more accurate collation of the early copies than had hitherto taken place was necessary towards a correct and faithful exhibition of the author's text. His materials accumulated so fast, that he determined to appear be fore the world as an Editor in form. From that moment he seems to have been regarded with jealousy by the elder Commentator, who appears to have sought an opportunity for a rup ture, which he soon afterwards found, or rather created. But it is necessary to go back for a moment, to point out another of Mr. Malone's produc tions. There are few events in lite

gave every promise of future eminence. But an independent fortune having soon after devolved upon him, he felt himself at liberty to retire from the bar, and devote his whole attention in future to those literary pursuits which have laid the foundation of his fame, and have entitled him to the gratitude of every English scholar. With a view to those superior opportunities for information and study, and the society which London affords, he soon after settled in that metropolis; and resided there with very little intermission for the remainder of his life. Such society, indeed, as he met with there must have been a perpetual feast of intellectual enjoyment to one so well-qualified to appreciate its value. It is no exaggeration to say that centuries may elapse before two such men as Burke and Johnson can be brought together; and how long may we look in vain for such a combination of various and splendid talent as was collected by the liberal and tasteful hospitality of Sir Joshua Reynolds, himself one of the brightest ornaments of the age in which he lived. Among the many eminent men with whom he became early acquainted, he was naturally drawn by the enthusiastic admiration which he felt for Shakspeare, and the attention which he had already paid to the elucidation of his works, into a particularly intimate intercourse with Mr. Steevens. The just views which he himself had formed led him to recognize in the system of criticism and illustration which that gentleman then adopted, the only means by which a correct exhibition of our great Poet could be obtained, Mr. Steevens was gratified to find that one so well acquainted with the sub-rary history more extraordinary in all ject entertained that high estimation of his labours which Mr. Malone expressed; and very soon discovered the advantage he might derive from the communications of a mind so richly stored. Mr. Malone was ready and liberal in imparting his knowledge, which, on the other part, was most gratefully received. In one of Mr. Steevens's letters, after acknowledging in the warmest terms the value of Mr. Malone's assistance, he adopts the language of their favourite, Shaks peare:

"Only I have left to say, More is thy due than more than all can pay."

[ocr errors]

its circumstances than the publication of the poems attributed to Rowley, Mr. Malone was firmly convinced that the whole was a fabrication by Chatterton; and, to support his opinion, published one of the earliest pamphlets which appeared in the course of this singular controversy. By exhibiting a series of specimens from early English writers, both prior and posterior to the period in which this supposed Poet was represented to have lived, he proved that his style bore no resemblance to genuine antiquity; and by stripping Rowley of his antique garb, which was easily done by the substitution of modern sypony,

mous

mous words in the places of those obsolete expressions which are sprinkled throughout these compositions, and at the same time intermingling some archæological phrases in the acknowledged productions of Chatterton, he clearly showed that they were all of the same character, and equally bore evident marks of modern versification, and a modern structure of language. He was followed by Mr. Warton and Mr. Tyrwhitt, in his Second Appendix; and although a few straggling believers yet exist, the public mind is pretty well made up upon the subject. But to return to Shakspeare. While Mr. Malone was engaged in this work, he received from Mr. Steevens a request of a most extraordinary nature. In a third edition of John son and Steevens's Shakspeare, which had been published under the superintendance of Mr. Reed, in 1785, Mr. Malone had contributed some notes in which Mr. Steevens's opinions were occasionally controverted. These he was now desired to retain in his new edition, exactly as they stood before, in order that Mr. S. might answer them. Mr. Malone replied, that he could make no such promise; that he must feel himself at liberty to correct his observations, where they were erroneous; to enlarge them, where they were defective; and even to expunge them altogether, where, upon further consideration, he was convinced they were wrong; in short, he was bound to present his work to the publick as perfect as he could make it. But he added, that he was willing to transmit every note of that description in its last state to Mr. Steevens, before it went to press; that he might answer it if he pleased; and that Mr. Malone would even preclude himself from the privilege of replying. Mr. Steevens persisted in requiring that they should with all their imperfections on appear their head; and on this being refused, declared that all communication on the subject of Shakspeare was at an end between them*. In 1790, Mr. Malone's edition at last appeared ; and was sought after and read with the greatest avidity. It is unnecessary to point out its merits; the public opinion upon it has been long pronounced. It cannot indeed be strictly said that it met with universal approbation.

* These particulars are collected from the correspondence which passed between them, which Mr. Malone preserved.

Mr. Ritson (of whose seeming malignity of temper it would be cruel to speak with harshness, as it is now well known that it proceeded from a disturbed state of mind which terminated at last in the most deplorable calamity that can afflict human nature,) appeared against it in an angry and scurrilous pamphlet. The misrepre sentations in this performance were so gross, and so easy of detection, though calculated to mislead a careless reader, that Mr. Malone thought it worth his while to point them out in a letter which he published, addressed to his friend Dr. Farmer. Poor Ritson, however, has not been the only one who has attempted to persuade the world that they have been mistaken in Mr. Malone's character as a critic. He has been assailed, not many years back, in a similar way indeed, but by a person of a very different description. A gentleman, high in the Law, having unluckily persuaded himself that if a man is ambitious of being witty, nothing more is necessary than that he should cease to be grave, thought proper to descend from the Bench, and indulge himself in som unwieldy gambols, which he flattered himself were at Mr. Malone's expense. To this hapless piece of pleasantry Mr. Malone made no reply. Mr. Horne Tooke, who, whatever were his talents as a grammarian, or his knowledge as an Anglo-Saxon, had by no means an extensive acquaintance with the literature of Shakspeare's age, has mentioned Mr. Malone and Dr. Johnson with equal contempt*, and im

*The passage to which I have alluded is in EITEA IITEPOENTA, vol. II, p. 319; and will show into what absurdity a man of real talent may be drawn, when he is carried away by an hypothesis, or, (which I rather believe to be the case in this instance,) writes under the influence of spleen. "In the Winter's Tale, Act I. Scene I. p. 273,

we have

[ocr errors]

Come (Sir Page)

Looke on me with your WELKIN eye,' On which passage S. Johnson says, hardily as usual, Welkin eye: blue eye; an eye of the same colour with the welkin or sky.' And this is accepted and repeated by Malone. I can only say that this Note is worthy of them both; and they of each other. Welkin is the present participle Willigend, or Wearcyns, i. e. volvens quod volvit of the AngloSaxon verb Willigan Wealcan, volure revolvere, which is equally applicable to

an

mediately after proceeds to sneer at Mr. Tyrwhitt. It may readily be supposed that Mr. Malone would not feel. very acutely the satire which associated him with such companious. But, to counterbalance these puny or peevish hostilities, his work gained the highest testimonies of applause from all who were best qualified to judge upon the subject, and from men whose approbation any one would be proud to obtain. Dr. J. Warton, in a most friendly letter, which accompanied a curious volume of old English poetry which had belonged to his brother Thomas, and which he presented to Mr. Malone as the person for whom its former possessor felt the highest esteem and the most cordial regard, observes to him that his edition is by far, very far, the best that had ever appeared. Professor Porson, who, as every one who knew him can testify, was by no means in the habit of bestowing hasty or thoughtless praise,

declared to the Writer of this account, that he considered the Essay on the three parts of Henry the Sixth

as one of the most convincing pieces of criticism that he had ever read. The following letter from Mr. Burke will not only exhibit the high opinion which he entertained of Mr. Malone, but will be read with interest, as furnishing an additional instance of the powers which that great statesman could display even in a complimentary letter to a friend; and how every topick became generalized, when it fell under the contemplation of his truly philosophical mind.

"MY DEAR SIR,

[No date.] "Upon my coming to my new habitation in town, I found your valuable work upon my table. I take it as a very good earnest of the instruction and pleasure which may be yet reserved for my declining years. Though I have had many little arrangements to make, both of a publick and private nature, my occupations were not able to overrule my curiosity, nor to prevent me from going through almost the whole of your able, exact, and interesting History of the vial thing to those who wish to study huStage. A history of the Stage is no triman nature in all shapes and positions. It is of all things the most instructive, to see not only the reflection of manners and characters at several periods, but the modes of making their reflection, and the manner of adapting it at those pe

kind. The Stage indeed may be considered as the republick of active literature, and its history as the history of that state. The great events of political history, when not combined with the same helps towards the study of the manners and characters of men, must be a study of an inferior nature.

an eye of any colour, to what revolves or rolls over our heads, and to the waves of the sea, pearcynde ea peacende ræ." Had Mr. Tooke produced an instance from any one author, who wrote in Eng-riods to the taste and disposition of manlish, of welkin having been used in the sense of rolling, or in any other than that of the sky, or been able to persuade us that Shakspeare was an AngloSaxon, there might have been some ground for his criticism,though no excuse for his petulance. Ingenious etymology is always amusing, and, where we are in the dark with regard to the meaning of a word, may sometimes furnish us with a clue to discover it; but to adhere to the primitive and obsolete signification of a term, when in the course of those changes which every language undergoes it has deflected into another sense, which is known and established, is surely little better than idle pedantry. As well might we maintain that hostis, in the age of Augustus, meant only a stranger, because Cicero informs us that it was so used in the earlier ages of the Republick; or, to take our examples from our own language, with as much propriety might we say that a man is a knave in proportion as he is poor, (Vide EПEA ITEР. vol. II. p. 425,) or describe a beautiful young lady as being uncouth, because we have not the honour of her acquaintance, and she is therefore unknown to us.

"You have taken infinite pains, and pursued your enquiries with great sagacity, not only in this respect, but in such of your notes as hitherto I have been able to peruse. You have earned your repose by publick-spirited labour. But I cannot help hoping, that when you have given yourself the relaxation which you will find necessary to your health, if you are not called to exert your great ta lents, and employ your great acquisitions in the transitory service to your country which is done in active life, you will continue to do it that permanent service which it receives from the labours of those who know how to make the silence of their closets more beneficial to the world than all the noise and bustle of courts, senates, and camps.

"I beg leave to send you a pamphlet which I have lately published. It is of an edition more correct, I think, than any

of

« PreviousContinue »