Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, Volume 137Department of Purchase and Supply, 1924 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 11
... testified that they were induced to make the award chiefly by the consideration that the power line might in future break down and injure persons and property . Held : That as it was manifest that four of the commissioners allowed a ...
... testified that they were induced to make the award chiefly by the consideration that the power line might in future break down and injure persons and property . Held : That as it was manifest that four of the commissioners allowed a ...
Page 13
... testified that they were induced to make the award chiefly by the consideration that the power line might in future break down and injure persons and property . Held : That as it was manifest that four of the commissioners allowed a ...
... testified that they were induced to make the award chiefly by the consideration that the power line might in future break down and injure persons and property . Held : That as it was manifest that four of the commissioners allowed a ...
Page 17
... testified , so far as material to be mentioned , in substance as follows : That the aforesaid land of the defendant owner is de- voted to and used only for farming purposes . That the land is on the north side of the New River , Holston ...
... testified , so far as material to be mentioned , in substance as follows : That the aforesaid land of the defendant owner is de- voted to and used only for farming purposes . That the land is on the north side of the New River , Holston ...
Page 18
... testified in substance , so far as material to be mentioned , as follows : That he was familiar with the said land and the value of said right of way or the amount that should be paid therefor . That the land is exclusively agricultural ...
... testified in substance , so far as material to be mentioned , as follows : That he was familiar with the said land and the value of said right of way or the amount that should be paid therefor . That the land is exclusively agricultural ...
Page 19
... Defendant . " J. T. S. Hoge , a witness , * testified that he was one of the commissioners in this case who went Statement . upon the land of the defendant pursuant to APPALACHIAN PR . Co. v . JOHNSON , 137 VA . 12. 19.
... Defendant . " J. T. S. Hoge , a witness , * testified that he was one of the commissioners in this case who went Statement . upon the land of the defendant pursuant to APPALACHIAN PR . Co. v . JOHNSON , 137 VA . 12. 19.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acres action Affirmed agreed agreement alleged allowed amended amount answer appeal application arbitration assessment assigns authority award bill cause claim coal Code Commission commissioners Commonwealth complainant complete condition consideration considered Constitution construction contained contract contractor convey corporation court damages decree deed defendant delivered effect entered entitled error evidence fact filed follows further give given Held instant instruction interest issue judgment jury land lease lessee lien material ment mining necessary notice objection operation Opinion owner paid parties payment person plaintiff present proceedings prove purchase question railroad reasonable received record recover referred refused road rule Statement statute sufficient suit surety taken testified testimony thereof tion tract trial unless valid verdict Virginia witness
Popular passages
Page 843 - Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course ; but when it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden ia on the holder to prove that he or some person under whom he claims, acquired the title as a holder in due course.
Page 126 - Absence or failure of consideration is matter of defense as against any person not a holder in due course; and partial failure of consideration is a defense pro tanto, whether the failure is an ascertained and liquidated amount or otherwise.
Page 186 - It will not do for a man to enter into a contract, and, when called upon to respond to its obligations, to say that he did not read it when he signed it, or did not know what it contained.
Page 352 - ... in order to ascertain that value, the original cost of construction, the amount expended in permanent improvements, the amount and market value of its bonds and stock, the present as compared with the original cost of construction, the probable earning capacity of the property under particular rates prescribed by statute, and the sum required to meet operating expenses, are all matters for consideration and are to be given such weight as may be just and right in each case.
Page 73 - But we start with the general consideration that a state may classify with reference to the evil to be prevented, and that if the class discriminated against is or reasonably might be considered to define those from whom the evil mainly is to be feared, it properly may be picked out.
Page 744 - Every law that alters the legal rules of evidence and receives less or different testimony than the law required at the time of the commission of the offense, in order to convict the offender.
Page 193 - Where a signature is forged or made without the authority of the person whose signature it purports to be, it is wholly inoperative, and no right to retain the instrument, or to give a discharge therefor, or to enforce payment thereof against any party thereto, can be acquired through or under such signature, unless the party against whom it is sought to enforce such right is precluded from setting up the forgery or want of authority.
Page 350 - Under the decisions of this court and of the Supreme Court of the United States, the law of the country or State where the contract was made and was to be performed by citizens of that country or State governs.
Page 202 - ... without liability on the part of the carrier, and subject to a lien for all freight and other lawful charges, including a reasonable charge for storage.
Page 621 - The doctrine may be stated in its most general form, that every express executory agreement in writing, whereby the contracting party sufficiently indicates an intention to make some particular property, real or personal, or fund, therein described or identified, a security for a debt or other obligation, or whereby the party promises to convey or assign or transfer the property as security, creates an equitable lien upon the property so indicated...