Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1930 - Copyright "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page iii
... District of Columbia by the letter ( " ) ; of the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals by a star ( * ) ; of the United States District Courts by the letter ( d ) ; of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals by the letter ( " ) ; and ...
... District of Columbia by the letter ( " ) ; of the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals by a star ( * ) ; of the United States District Courts by the letter ( d ) ; of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals by the letter ( " ) ; and ...
Page 20
... District of Columbia , see section 3 , rule 8 , of said court as amended October 18 , 1911 , published in 171 Ó . G. 1007 , which states : For failure to file the brief within the specified time , such appeal shall stand dismissed . It ...
... District of Columbia , see section 3 , rule 8 , of said court as amended October 18 , 1911 , published in 171 Ó . G. 1007 , which states : For failure to file the brief within the specified time , such appeal shall stand dismissed . It ...
Page 27
... District of Columbia . The same is true if none of the junior parties establish a date of invention prior to that of the senior party . Where , however , there are more than two parties and only one of them is under an order to show ...
... District of Columbia . The same is true if none of the junior parties establish a date of invention prior to that of the senior party . Where , however , there are more than two parties and only one of them is under an order to show ...
Page 31
... District of Columbia in District of Columbia v . Roth , 18 App . D. C. 547 , with respect to extending the time for filing the transcript in that case is deemed to be indicative of the ruling which should be made here . In that case the ...
... District of Columbia in District of Columbia v . Roth , 18 App . D. C. 547 , with respect to extending the time for filing the transcript in that case is deemed to be indicative of the ruling which should be made here . In that case the ...
Page 33
... District of Columbia to the effect that there is neither legal nor moral excuse for even an approximate simulation of a well - known mark appropriated to goods of the same descriptive properties should be applied in this case . The ...
... District of Columbia to the effect that there is neither legal nor moral excuse for even an approximate simulation of a well - known mark appropriated to goods of the same descriptive properties should be applied in this case . The ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Acting Examiner affirmed alleged amendment appellant's appellee applicant's Assistant Commissioner Associate Justices Board of Appeals brake bands Chief Justice Circuit Court combination Commissioner of Patents Company Congress construction cord countersink Court of Appeals Court of Customs decalcomania Decided decision decree denied descriptive properties device disclosed disclosure District Court District of Columbia drum electric element entitled Examiner of Interferences Examiners in Chief fabric filed gasoline gearing Held unpatentable infringement interference proceeding invention involved issue jurisdiction KINNAN latch lever machine manufacture mark material means mechanism metal method motion motor operation ORSDEL party Patent Appeals Patent Office petition piston plaintiff portion position prior art prior patent produce question REDROW reduction to practice reference registration reissue application reversed roller rotatable rule shaft specific springs Statutes structure substantially suit switch T. A. Hostetler tion trade-mark treaty of Berlin treaty of Versailles United valid
Popular passages
Page 101 - ... notice to adverse parties and other due proceedings had, may adjudge that such applicant is entitled, according to law, to receive a patent for his invention, as specified in his claim, or for any part thereof, as the facts in the case may appear. And such adjudication, if it be in favor of the right of the applicant, shall authorize the commissioner to issue such patent on the applicant filing in the Patent Office a copy of the adjudication and otherwise complying with the requirements of law.
Page 232 - A treaty is, in its nature, a contract between two nations, not a legislative act. It does not generally effect, of itself, the object to be accomplished, especially so far as its operation is infra-territorial ; but is carried into execution by the sovereign power of the respective parties to the instrument.
Page 232 - Our constitution declares a treaty to be the law of the land. It is, consequently, to be regarded in courts of justice as equivalent to an act of the legislature, whenever it operates of itself without the aid of any legislative provision. But when the terms of the stipulation import a contract, when either of the parties engages to perform a particular act, the treaty addresses itself to the political, not the judicial department; and the legislature must execute the contract before it can become...
Page 280 - Any refusal of entry under this section shall continue in effect until the President shall find and instruct the Secretary of the Treasury that the conditions which led to such refusal of entry no longer exist. (h) DEFINITION. — When used in this section and in sections 338 and 340, the term
Page 46 - That no mark which consists merely in the name of an individual, firm, corporation, or association, not written, printed, impressed, or woven in some particular or distinctive manner...
Page 101 - ... and the court having cognizance thereof, on notice to adverse parties and other due proceedings had, may adjudge that such applicant le entitled, according to law, to receive a patent for his invention, as specified In his claim, or for any part thereof, as the facts in the case may appear.
Page 186 - That he was not the original and first inventor or discoverer of any material and substantial part of the thing patented; or, Fifth.
Page 307 - There is a substantial identity, constituting infringement, where a device is a copy of the thing described by the patentee, 'either without variation, or with such variations as are consistent with its being in substance the same thing.
Page 200 - ... a registered or known trade mark owned and in use by another and appropriated to merchandise of the same descriptive properties as to be likely to cause confusion or mistake in the mind of the public or to deceive purchasers shall not be registered...
Page 184 - The filing of a regular application for patent completely disclosing the invention is treated as equivalent to reduction to practice. The inventor who proves to be the first to conceive the invention and the first to reduce it to practice will be held to be the prior inventor, but more complicated situations cannot be stated this simply.