Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1945 - Copyright "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 19
... sufficient reasons why they were not earlier presented . Held consistent with the second paragraph of section 4903 R. S. , which recites that " No amendment for the first time presenting or asserting a claim which is the same as , or ...
... sufficient reasons why they were not earlier presented . Held consistent with the second paragraph of section 4903 R. S. , which recites that " No amendment for the first time presenting or asserting a claim which is the same as , or ...
Page 20
... sufficient reasons why they were not earlier presented . We believe that this practice is consistent with the statute . Nothing in the paragraph quoted above suggests that an amendment can be made as a matter of right after final ...
... sufficient reasons why they were not earlier presented . We believe that this practice is consistent with the statute . Nothing in the paragraph quoted above suggests that an amendment can be made as a matter of right after final ...
Page 21
... upon a showing , duly verified , of good and sufficient reasons why they were not earlier presented . " Rules of Practice , U. S. Patent Office , rule 68 ( 1942 ) . [ U. S. Court of Appeals for the District of MCGREW V. COE 21 Affirmed. ...
... upon a showing , duly verified , of good and sufficient reasons why they were not earlier presented . " Rules of Practice , U. S. Patent Office , rule 68 ( 1942 ) . [ U. S. Court of Appeals for the District of MCGREW V. COE 21 Affirmed. ...
Page 22
... sufficient to bar a patent . But only in this limited sense is the analogy permissible . " APPEAL from the District Court of the United States for the District of Colum- bia . Reversed . Messrs . A. K. Shipe and H. Frank Wiegand ( Mr ...
... sufficient to bar a patent . But only in this limited sense is the analogy permissible . " APPEAL from the District Court of the United States for the District of Colum- bia . Reversed . Messrs . A. K. Shipe and H. Frank Wiegand ( Mr ...
Page 24
... sufficient to bar a patent . But only in this limited sense is 2 " 12 . The Patent Office Examiner thereafter finally rejected the applicant's claims solely because the applicant had failed to make the suggested claim . " See Mell v ...
... sufficient to bar a patent . But only in this limited sense is 2 " 12 . The Patent Office Examiner thereafter finally rejected the applicant's claims solely because the applicant had failed to make the suggested claim . " See Mell v ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affidavit alleged APPEAL from Patent appealed claims appellant appellant's appellant's application appellee appellee's applicant's Board of Appeals brief C. C. P. A. Patents circuit court cited Commissioner of Patents Company compound confusing similarity confusingly similar considered contention Corporation counts court of appeals Court of Customs Customs and Patent delivered the opinion descriptive properties device disclosed disclosure district court entitled evidence Examiner of Interferences Exhibit GARRETT Gloria Jean HATFIELD heating held holding infringement interference proceeding invention inventor involved issue Italian Swiss Colony JACKSON LENROOT mark material means melamine metal methoxy notice of opposition opposition proceeding Oral argument parties Patent Appeals Patent Office Presiding Judge Primary Examiner prior art priority question reasons of appeal record reduction to practice reference registration reissue application rejected claims statement supra testimony tion trade-mark tribunals U. S. Court United States Court United States Patent unpatentable USPQ valve W. W. Cochran
Popular passages
Page 431 - ... not patented or described in any printed publication in this or any foreign country, before his invention or discovery thereof, or more than two years prior to his application, and not in public use or on sale in this country for more than two years prior to his application, unless the same is proved to have been abandoned, may, upon payment of the fees required by law, and other due proceeding had, obtain a patent therefor.
Page 300 - That trademarks which are identical with a registered or known trademark owned and in use by another, and appropriated to merchandise of the same descriptive properties, or which so nearly resemble a registered or known trademark owned and in use by another, and appropriated to merchandise of the same descriptive properties, as to be likely to cause confusion or mistake in the mind of the public, or to deceive purchasers...
Page 77 - Columbia upon appeal from the commissioner, the applicant may have remedy by bill in equity ; and the court having cognizance thereof, on notice to adverse parties and other due proceedings had, may adjudge that such applicant is entitled, according to law, to receive a patent for his invention, as specified in his claim, or for any part thereof, as the facts in the case may appear.
Page 164 - This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office in an interference proceeding involving a patent, No.
Page 346 - This is an appeal in an interference proceeding from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office awarding priority of the invention defined by the four counts in issue (Nos.
Page 431 - ... been patented or described in a printed publication in this or any foreign country more than two years before the date of the actual filing of the application in this country, or which had been in public use or on sale in this country for more than two years prior to such filing.
Page 20 - A claim which is the same as, or for the same or substantially the same subject matter as, a claim of an issued patent may not be made in any application unless such a claim is made prior to one year from the date on which the patent was granted.
Page 629 - That no mark, which consists merely in the name of an individual, firm, corporation, or association, not written, printed, impressed, or woven in some particular or distinctive manner...
Page 103 - ... a registered or known trade mark owned and in use by another and appropriated to merchandise of the same descriptive properties as to be likely to cause confusion or mistake in the mind of the public or to deceive purchasers shall not be registered...
Page 51 - The limits of a patent must be known for the protection of the patentee, the encouragement of the inventive genius of others and the assurance that the subject of the patent will be dedicated ultimately to the public.