Nano-HypeNanotechnology, the science of molecular engineering at the atomic scale, has captured the popular imagination. From movies to TV series to video games, utopian fantasies and horror scenarios involving nanotechnology have become a staple of the entertainment industry. The hyperbole surrounding this new technology comes not only from the media but also from scientists who exaggerate the anticipated benefits of nanotechnology to justify research funding, as well as from environmentalists and globalization opponents, who sometimes indulge in doom-and-gloom prophecies to advance their own agendas. The result is widespread misinformation and an uninformed public.In an effort to set the record straight, professor of communication studies David M. Berube has written this thoroughly researched, accessible overview of nanotechnology in contemporary culture. He evaluates the claims and counterclaims about nanotechnology by a broad range of interested parties including government officials and bureaucrats, industry leaders and entrepreneurs, scientists, journalists, and other persons in the media. Berube appraises programs and grand initiatives here and abroad, and he examines the environmental concerns raised by opponents, as well as the government and private responses to these concerns. With so much argumentation on both sides, it is difficult for anyone to determine what is true. Nano-Hype provides up-to-date, objective information to inform the public.Based on over a decade of research and interviews with many of the movers and shakers in nanotechnology, this critical study will help the reader separate the realistic prospects from the hype surrounding this important cutting-edge technology. |
Contents
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS | 11 |
INTRODUCTION | 19 |
EXAGGERATION AND HYPESTERIA | 29 |
SPECULATION | 49 |
Critics | 65 |
Conclusion | 80 |
Government Science Promotion | 94 |
Executive Branch | 104 |
NANOINDUSTRY | 213 |
NONGOVERNMENTAL | 245 |
NANOHAZARDS | 275 |
A Primer on Nanotoxicology Research | 281 |
Risk Analysis | 300 |
Diagnosis | 310 |
SEIN as Symbology | 319 |
State of SEIN | 329 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accessed April accessed December accessed February accessed July 11 accessed October accessed September applications associated atoms biotechnology budget carbon nanotubes cells Center Charles Choi claims commercial Committee on Science communication companies concerns debate Drexler economic environmental Eric Drexler example federal Feynman Foresight Update fullerenes funding future global gray goo Group House of Representatives hype hyperbole Ibid impact Implications of Nanotechnology industry Institute investment investors issues January Josh Wolfe July 11 June materials million molecular manufacturing molecular nanotechnology nano nanobots NanoBusiness nanofactory nanomaterials nanoparticles nanoscale Nanoscale Science nanoscience Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Nanotech Report nanotechnology research NanoTechWeb National Nanotechnology Initiative nology November organization particles percent potential projects public sphere research and development risk Roco science and technology scientific scientists Small Smalley social societal and ethical Societal Implications start-ups tech tion University venture capital Vicki Colvin

