GENERAL INDEX.

Antitrust act:

Quotations from cases arising under......

Looks not to effect upon prices, but to effect upon competition...
Reasonable construction of, excludes indirect, remote, and trivial
restraints...

Page.

115-145

115

116

Evil or ruinous consequences of enforcing, not to control courts.
Language of court construing "undue" or "unreasonable" into..
When intent important, and when not important, in cases under..
Defenses based on, in actions on contracts..............

Remedies provided by, not extra-territorially enforceable...
Substantial relation must be shown to interstate commerce in cases under.
Agreement dividing territory for purposes of sales held within..
Not violated by agreement to be performed extra-territorially...
Association formed to impart secret information to its members held not to
violate....

122-124

129-138

139, 140

147-151

Stockyards association held not combination violative of.
Combination reaching into single State, within terms of..
Violated by combinations in form of holding company..

232, 233

256

260-262

Combination of oil companies in form of holding company held within pro-
hibitions of......

282

Violated by having common, purchasing, selling, and transporting agen-
cies....

283

Vast combination of tobacco dealers and manufacturers held to be within
prohibitions of.....

286-289

Combination between interstate railroads within prohibitions of... 293, 295–297
Combination in form of terminal association within prohibitions of..
Combination of workingmen held to be within prohibitions of..

295

297

Arbitrary power, Constitution leaves no room for play of......

64

United States (208 U. S., 161).

Brokerage contracts do not pertain to interstate commerce, but governed by
local law.....

Carmack amendment to Hepburn Act, held constitutional.

Carrier may hire, when it does not own, facilities..

Cases used herein:

Adair v.

Adams Express Co. v. Kentucky (214 U. S., 218) ..

Addystone Pipe & Steel Co. v. United States (175 U. S., 211)..

57, 82, 115, 116, 139, 188

American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co. (213 U. S., 347). .
American Express Co. v. Iowa (196 U. S., 133).
American Express Co. v. United States (212 U. S., 522)..
Anderson v. United States (171 U. S., 604)..

17, 18, 20

198, 222
113

17, 19, 187
25, 188
13,

Cases used herein-Continued.

Page.

Armour Packing Co. v. United States (209 U. S., 56).

Asbell v. Kansas (209 U. S., 251).

77, 86, 109, 195
17, 42, 197

Atlantic Coast Line R. R. Co. v. Mazursky (216 U. S., 122).

198

Atlantic Coast Line v. Riverside Mills (219 U. S., 186)..
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission (221
U. S., 612)..

86, 198

147, 199

Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Pitcairn Coal Co., ex rel., United States
(215 U. S., 481).

102, 199

Bement v. National Harrow Co. (186 U. S., 70) ..

140, 203

Board of Trade of the City of Chicago v. Christie Grain & Stock Co. (198
U. S., 236)...

California v. Central Pac. R. R. Co. (127 U. S., 1)..
Cardwell v. American Bridge Co. (113 U. S., 205).
Case of the State Freight Tax (15 Wall., 232) ..

Case of the State Tax on Gross Receipts (15 Wall., 284).
Central Ohio Salt Co. v. Guthrie (35 Ohio St., 666)...
Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge (11 Pet.).

13, 151, 176, 206

9, 15, 206
207

156, 157, 207

53, 207

24, 208

31, 208

128, 209

75, 117, 177, 209

Chattanooga Foundry & P. Works v. City of Atlanta (203 U. S., 390).
Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas Ry. Co. (135 U. S., 641)...........
Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Dey (35 Fed. R. 866).............

168, 209

170, 209

172, 210

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. M'Guire (219 U. S., 549)...
Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Ry. Co. v. United States (219 U. S.,
486)...

66, 210

25, 210

Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Arkansas (219 U. S., 453)... 36, 210
Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States (143 U. S., 457).......

81, 211

Cincinnati, N. O. & Texas Pac. Ry. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commis-
sion (162 U. S., 184)..

Cincinnati, Portsmouth, Big Sandy & Pomeroy Packet Co. v. Bay (200
U. S., 179)...

Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co. (212 U. S.,
227).....

Cook v. State (26 Ind. App., 278)..

Cooley v. Wardens of the Port (12 How., 299).

Coppell v. Hall (7 Wal,., 542)..

County of Mobile v. Kimball (102 U. S., 691).

Covington, Etc., Bridge Co. v. Kentucky (154 U. S., 204)..

Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. Parks & Sons Co. (220 U. S., 373)..

Employers' Liability Cases (207 U. S., 463)..

Escanaba Co. v. Chicago (107 U. S., 678).

Fargo v. Michigan (121 U. S., 230)...

174, 213
50, 51, 214

148, 214
12, 44, 214

52, 215

32, 37, 79, 152, 215

60, 215

12, 178, 215

12, 218

149, 219
171, 220

45, 176, 222

31, 222

Cases used herein-Continued.

Field v. Clark (143 U. S., 649)..

Frisbie v. United States (157 U. S., 160)..

Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Wallace (223 U. S., 481).
Gibbs v. Consolidated Gas Co. of Baltimore (130 U. S., 397)..
Gladson v. Minnesota (166 U. S., 427).

Page.
164, 222

66, 222

222

127, 223

38, 223

Gloucester Ferry Co. v. Pennsylvania (114 U. S., 196).
Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co. (221 U. S., 418).

Greene, in re (52 Fed. R., 104)..

23, 224

120, 224

120, 224

Hall v. De Cuir (95 U. S., 485).

Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Ellis (165 U. S., 150).

Hale v. Henkel (201 U. S., 43)..

Hamilton v. Vicksburg, etc., R. R. Co. (119 U. S., —).......
Hanauer v. Doane (12 Wall., 342)...

Harriman v. Interstate Commerce Commission (211 U. S., 407).
Head Money Cases (112 U. S., 580)....

65, 68, 225

71, 73, 225

34, 229

52, 229

149, 229

106, 229

22, 230

Henderson v. Mayor of the City of New York (92 U. S., 259).

47, 180, 230

Hennington v. Georgia (163 U. S., 299).

38, 231

Henry v. A. B. Dick Co. (224 U. S., 1)..

141, 231

Herndon v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. (218 U. S., 135)............ 68, 232

Houston & Texas Central R. R. Co. v. Mayes (201 U. S., 231).

Illinois Central R. R. Co. v. McKendree (203 U. S., 514)..
Indiana Manufacturing Co. v. J. I. Case Thrashing Machine Co. (154 Fed.
R., 365)......

61, 233

63, 233

234

Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brimson (154 U. S., 447).
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago, R. I. & Pac. Ry. Co. (218
U. S., 88)..

64, 77, 234

89, 102, 237

Interstate Commerce Commission v. Diffenbaugh et al. (222 U. S., 42)..
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Illinois Central Railroad Co. (215
U. S., 452)....

Interstate Commerce Commission v. Delaware, L. & W. R. R. Co. (220
U. S., 235)..........

Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas
Pacific Ry. Co. (167 U. S., 479)..

85, 86, 237

110, 238
113, 241

88, 112, 243

Interstate Commerce Commission v. Northern Pacific Ry Co. (216 U. S.,
538)..

245

Interstate Commerce Commission and United States v. Baltimore & Ohio

Railroad Co., and others (224 U. S., —).......

111, 245

Kansas v. Colorado (206 U. S., 46).

181, 245

Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Albers (223 U. S., 573).

Legal Tender Case (Juilliard v. Greenman, 110 U. S., 421)

69, 74, 181, 246

Leisy v. Hardin (135 U. S., 100).

62, 246

Leloup v. Port of Mobile (127 U. S., 640).

License Cases (5 How., 504)...

Lottery Case, Champion v. Ames, heard with Frances v. United States
(188 U. S., 321)..........

... 16, 76, 155, 247

Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Commonwealth (99 Ky., 132)....... 172, 247

31, 247
46,247

Cases used herein-Continued.

Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Cook Brewing Co. (223 U. S., 70) .
Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Eubank (184 U. S., 27)..

Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Kentucky (183 U. S., 503)..

Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Mottley (219 U. S., 467)....

Louisville & N. R. R. Co. v. Railroad Commission of Tennessee (19 Fed.

Page.

248

28, 248

40, 249
87,249

Mississippi R. R. Commission v. Illinois Cent. R. R. Co. (203 U.S., 335). 61, 252

Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Haber (169 U. S., 613)..........
Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Kansas (216 U. S., 262)..

60, 252

56, 253

National Cotton Oil Co. v. Texas (197 U. S., 115).

Mobile & Jackson R. R. Co. v. Mississippi (210 U. S., 187).
Monongahela Bridge Co. v. United States (216.U. S., 177)..
Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United States (148 U. S., 312).
Montague v. Lowry (193 U. S., 38)...................

Morris Run Coal Co. v. Barclay Coal Co. (68 Pa. St., 173).
Mugler v. Kansas (123 U. S., 623)...

Murray v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. (62 Fed. R., 24).

New York v. Miln (11 Pet., 102)..

New York & H. R. R. R. Co. v. United States (212 U. S., 481)..
New York, N. H. & H. R. R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission,
Chesapeake coal case (200 U. S., 361)..............

Northern Securities Co. v. United States (193 U. S., 197).

42,257
258

83, 108, 169, 259

9,

13, 14, 54, 55, 67, 77, 125–128, 155, 160–162, 260

Ogden v. Gibbons (9 Wheat., 1)................

49, 50, 263

Pearsall v. Great Northern Ry. Co. (161 U. S., 646).

Oklahoma v. Kansas Natural Gas Co. (221 U. S., 229).
Osborn v. Bank of the United States (9 Wheat., 326)
Passenger Cases, City of Boston v. Norris and Smith N. Turner, Health
Commission of the Port of New York, heard together (7 How., 283)...

Paul v. Virginia (8 Wall., 168)....

Pensacola Tel. Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co. (96 U. S., 1)..

Philadelphia & Southern S. S. Co. v. Pennsylvania (122 U. S., 326)........... 178, 267

27, 263

77, 264

15,

41, 51, 53, 61, 265

18, 265

140, 266.

16, 179, 267

Plumley v. Massachusetts (155 U. S., 461)..

45, 268

Preston v. Browder (1 Wheat., 116)....

81, 268

Procter & Gamble Co. v. United States, Interstate Commerce Commission,

Roach v. Atchison, Topeka & S. F. Ry. Co. (218 U. S., 159).

68, 276