Page images
PDF
EPUB

presenting some poems to her, ordered him the gratuity of an hundred pounds, his lordsh asked with some contempt of the poet, " all this for a song?" And that the queen rep "then give him what is reason;" that Spr having long waited in vain for the funer the royal order, presented to her Majes

verses :

I was promis'd on a time
To have reason for my rhime;
From that time unto this seasor
I've received nor rhime nor reas

It is added, that these magic duced the desired effect, it

rection of payment to the ine

са

as in the reproof of the aus I
Such, says Mr. Todd,
marvellous opposition o
on Spenser by Elizabet
by the biographers,
count originates it
Fuller's Worthies of E

the

[graphic]

after

minster

the pall

pai poets of

said that Spenser

in Angliam inops

nd, of Hawthernden,

me, that Spenser's goods Irish in Desmond's [Tyrone's] ouse and a little child of his and his wife nearly escaped; that

he

Elizabeth's generosity, had the story been true. Now that book was printed in 1589, and Spenser's patent was not granted till February, 1590-1, so that Puttenham could not well praise a liberal action before it took place.

And with regard to Fuller, his authority is not quite so contemptible as is here intimated ; for though his book did not appear till after his death, he spent many years in collecting the materials for it. Fuller entered of Queen's-college, Cambridge, in 1520, not much above twenty years after Spenser's death, so that he might have heard the anecdote from very sufficient authority.

But if it shall appear that our poet himself conceived a strong resentment against Burleigh for treating him with contempt, the story may not be quite so ridiculous as is represented, even though told by the facetious Dr. Fuller.

In his "Ruines of Rome," certainly written after the year 1591, Spenser thus severely characterises the lord Treasurer:

For he that now wields all things at his will,
Scorns th' one, and th' other in his deeper skill;
O griefe of griefes! O gall of all good hearts!
Of him that first was raisde for vertuous partes,
And now broad spreading like an aged tree,
Let's none shoot up that nigh him planted bee;
O let the man, of whom the muse is scorned,
Nor alive nor dead, be of the muse adorned.

The

The two last lines, perhaps, may be thought a pretty good confirmation of the story; at least they prove that the poet felt a keen resentment against Burleigh for "scorning his muse."

Not long after this poor Spenser returned to Ireland, where he married in 1594, and in 1596 we find him filling the office of clerk of the council of the province of Munster, but the rebellion of Tyrone breaking out in October, 1598, he was obliged to fly to England, and that with such precipitation, as to leave his goods and an infant behind him. The sanguinary rebels, after carrying off the property, set fire to the house, and the child perished in the flames. Spenser arrived in England with a heart broken in consequence of these misfortunes, and died at a public house in King-street, Westminter, the sixteenth of January following. Two days afterwards his remains were interred in Westminsterabbey, near the tomb of Chaucer; the pall being held up by some of the principal poets of the time.

The accurate Camden has said that Spenser returned to England poor, "in Angliam inops reversus ;" and Drummond, of Hawthernden, relates the following story :

"Ben Jonson told me, that Spenser's goods were robbed by the Irish in Desmond's [Tyrone's] rebellion, his house and a little child of his burnt, and he and his wife nearly escaped; that

he

he afterwards died in King-street, by absolute want of bread, and that he refused twenty pieces sent him by the earl of Essex, and gave this answer to the person who brought them, "that he was sure he had no time to spend them.*"

Though this relation confirms the general account of the extreme poverty which embittered the close of Spenser's eventful life, it is hardly to be credited that a man in such circumstances would refuse the earl's bounty, for though he might be sensible of his own approaching dissolution, he could not but feel for the distresses of his surviving family.

But Spenser's last able editor will not allow that he was reduced to absolute indigence. He thinks that the poet laureat must have had some claims for arrears of his pension, which supposition, however, is unsupported by any evidence, and it may as well be supposed on the other hand, that nothing was due to him, or that the scanty pittance was soon exhausted.

Another reason alleged against the wretched poverty of Spenser, after his last return to England, is the wealthy condition of his relations, the Spensers, of Althorpe. But how happened it that these relations suffered Spenser, the pride of their house, to be a dependant on the bounty of Sidney; and how was it that they neither de

* Drummond's Works, p. 224.

frayed

frayed the expenses of his burial, nor attended in person to pay their last respects to his memory?

The charge of the funeral was borne by the liberal earl of Essex, which circumstance alone is a proof that the wealthy relations of Spenser abandoned, in his utmost need, the man who shed the greatest lustre on their family name.

« PreviousContinue »