Public and Private MoralityStuart Hampshire How far can we apply the same moral principles to both public and private behaviour. In the interests of effective political action, are we right to accept acts of deceit, exploitation or force which we would regard as unacceptable in private relations with individuals? What means can be properly adopted in the promotion of great public causes? The problem of 'dirty hands' in politics was posed most strikingly by Machiavelli. It has re-emerged this century in a pressing and, to some extent, a new form, in connection with the two World Wars and more recently the Vietnam War, where the political decisions and the destruction, and risks of destruction, have been of a scale and character not previously experienced. The contributors, including Bernard Williams, Thomas Nagel, T. M. Scanlon, and Ronald Dworkin, examine the background to this problem in moral and political theory. |
Common terms and phrases
absolute abstract acceptable adversarial system American conservatism argue argument assessment believe Bernard Williams calculation Charles Fried choice circumstances citizens conception of equality concern conclusion conduct conflict consequences consequentialist conservative considerations constitutive political context criminal decisions dispositions distinction distribution duties economic egalitarian ethics example explain explicit fact fairness and equality human ideal important interests intuitions involved J. S. Mill judgment justified kind less liberal settlement liberty limits manners means moral claims moral issues moral philosophy moral requirements morally disagreeable natural obligations official overriding particular person philosophy policies political morality political positions politicians practical reasoning principle problem prohibitions protect public action public morality public role question rational recognised reflection representative democracy respect restrictions Robert Nozick RONALD DWORKIN rule utilitarianism sense situation social society specific structured violence STUART HAMPSHIRE suppose things THOMAS NAGEL thought tion violence virtue