Hearings, Volume 1 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 58
... record ? General CASSIDY . It probably would be best to spell it out that way . Mr. DAVIS . All right . ( The requested information follows :) Comprehensive studies being accomplished under the auspices of the Water Resources Council ...
... record ? General CASSIDY . It probably would be best to spell it out that way . Mr. DAVIS . All right . ( The requested information follows :) Comprehensive studies being accomplished under the auspices of the Water Resources Council ...
Page 64
... record or read , sir . Mr. ROBISON . That is fine . Put it in the record . ( The following statement was submitted for the record :) FLOODING Rainfall over the week - end starting 4 March caused heavy run - off and flooding of varying ...
... record or read , sir . Mr. ROBISON . That is fine . Put it in the record . ( The following statement was submitted for the record :) FLOODING Rainfall over the week - end starting 4 March caused heavy run - off and flooding of varying ...
Page 78
... record - breaking flood , exceeding the previous record flood from 3 to 6 feet , caused urban and agricultural damages esti- mated at $ 43,000,000 . Minnesota River flood flows also contributed significantly to the record flood stages ...
... record - breaking flood , exceeding the previous record flood from 3 to 6 feet , caused urban and agricultural damages esti- mated at $ 43,000,000 . Minnesota River flood flows also contributed significantly to the record flood stages ...
Page 80
... record 1965 flood exceeded the 1952 flood by about 2.6 feet at La Crosse , causing damages estimated at $ 7,600,000 . More extensive damages were prevented by tem- porary diking and sandbagging to protect a North Side residential area ...
... record 1965 flood exceeded the 1952 flood by about 2.6 feet at La Crosse , causing damages estimated at $ 7,600,000 . More extensive damages were prevented by tem- porary diking and sandbagging to protect a North Side residential area ...
Page 108
... record flood , that of April 1965 , was 3.1 feet higher than the pre record flood of 1892. Damages resulting from floods of 1951 and 1952 amo to $ 442,600 and $ 539,100 , respectively . These damages would amount to $ 83 and $ 969,000 ...
... record flood , that of April 1965 , was 3.1 feet higher than the pre record flood of 1892. Damages resulting from floods of 1951 and 1952 amo to $ 442,600 and $ 539,100 , respectively . These damages would amount to $ 83 and $ 969,000 ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acre-feet Allocation for fiscal Allocation to June Balance to complete Benefit-cost BOLAND bridge carryover from prior Cash contribution channel Chesapeake Bay Comparison of Federal complete after fiscal construction program PB−1 Corps of Engineers cost estimates.-The current cost Federal funds County Creek current Federal cost Delaware River Dickey-Lincoln project drainage Drainage basin Engineering and design Estimated Federal cost Estimated non-Federal cost estimated project cost estimates.-The current Federal Federal cost estimate Federal cost estimates.-The Federal Power Commission feet fiscal year 1968 flood protection improvements increase June 30 KIRWAN KOISCH Lake Lands and damages latest estimate levee lock and dam maintenance megawatts miles Mississippi River navigation Ohio River operation Pending adjustments Project cost esti Relocations requested for fiscal Reservoir Saint John River square miles Summarized financial data Summary construction program Supervision and administration Total applied cost Total estimated project Total obligations Total project cost Undelivered orders Undistributed cost Wabash River