About this book
My library
Books on Google Play
III. Historical notices of the great Iranian or Assyrian empire founded by Nim-
rod and the Cuthim
1. According to the author of the Dabistan, the Mahabadian dynasty
preceded the Pishdadian in the government of Iran. But the Pishda-
dian cannot have commenced earlier than the latter end of the ninth cen-
tury before Christ. Therefore the Mahabadian must be the same as the old Cuthico-Assyrian
PAGE
394
395
2. Duration of the Cuthico-Assyrian empire, as collected from the regal
catalogues of Syncellus, Polyhistor, and Ctesias
396
3. This empire is the same as the primeval Scythian empire, noticed by
Justin and Strabo as preceding the Assyrian empire known to the
Greeks
(1.) Justin's account of it
(2.) Strabo's account of it
IV. An inquiry into the character and origin of the Scythians, who founded this
early Asiatic empire
1. The Scythians or Scuthim were the Cuthim of Nimrod
2. Respecting the nature of Scythism and Ionism
(1.) Scythism and Ionism are described, not as two successive em-
pires, but as two successive heresies or apostasies from pure reli-
gion and they are respectively the same, as what I have called
Buddhism and Brahmenism
398
ib.
400
403
407
(2.) How we are to understand the termination of the Scythic nane
and succession in the days of Serug
411
(3.) How the Scythic heresy prevailed from the flood to the tower
V. Respecting the era of the old Scythic empire, and of the building of the
412
tower
413
1. The emigration from Armenia could not have taken place until after the death of Noah and his three sons
2. The early postdiluvian chronology of the Hebrew Pentateuch shewn to
be erroneous
417
3. The early postdiluvian chronology of Josephus shewn to be erroneous
4. The early postdiluvian chronology of the lxx shewn to be erroneous
5. The early postdiluvian chronology of the Samaritan Pentateuch shewn
to be perfectly genuine
421
422
6. The dates of the commencement and termination of the Scythic empire
ascertained
424
VI. Polity of Nimrod's empire
1. Its polity consisted in an arrangement of the community into four dis-
tinct castes or tribes: the sacerdotal, the military, the mercantile, and
the servile
2. Circumstantial evidence adduced in proof of such an opinion
(1.) From Justin
(2.) From Scripture
(3.) From the Dabistan
VII, Machiavellian politics of Nimrod
426
427
432
435
441
442
CHAPTER III.
Respecting the primitive division of the world among the children
of Noah, the triads of the Gentiles, the confusion of languages,
and the mode of the dispersion from Bábel
446
I. The inheritance of Japhet was the whole of Europe and northern Asia
1. Gomer
447
II. The inheritance of Shem was southern Asia intermingled with Ham
XX
(2.) Joktan
4. Lud
5. Aram
III. The inheritance or acquisitions of Ham, at the first division of the earth, were the whole of Africa, and southern Asia intermingled with Shem
1. Cush
1452
1453
454
2. Misr
455
3. Phut
456
4. Canaan
.457
IV. The confusion of languages in some centrical region may be ascertained
even independently of Scripture
458
1. Mankind divide themselves into three great races; Hindoos, Arabs,
Tartars
6. Analogous to the three races, there are three primeval languages; Sans-
7. The three races and the three languages are all found in Iran
8. Hence Iran must have been the cradle of mankind
462
9. The confusion at Babel was a real confusion of language: but only
three different tongues were produced at the time of the dispersion
463
V. The division of the world by Noah among his sons-
466
1. This division was triple, agreeably to the number of his sons; and it
was well known to the Gentiles
2. From the three sons of Adam, viewed as reappearing in the three sons
of Noah, originated the divine triads of the Gentiles
468
VI. Respecting the peculiar mode of the dispersion from Babel
: 475
1. Existence of castes in various different regions
(1.) Summary of what has been learned from the inquiry
476
482
(2.) Conclusion deduced from it
2. There is sufficient evidence to prove, that the various Noëtic tribes
went off under Cuthic leaders, sacerdotal and military.. Hence the
Cuthim, as constituting the two superior orders of priests and military
nobles, were mingled with their brethren in almost every part of the
world
494
485
(1.) Proof of the Cuthic descent of the several sacerdotal and military classes, from historical notices
(2.) Proof of the same position, from the remarkable travels of mem-
bers of those classes
493
(3.) Proof of the same position, from the circumstance of the sacerdo-
tal orders of different nations all bearing similar family titles
(4.) Proof of the same position, from certain extraordinary names borne
by the several military classes
495
496
CHAPTER IV.
Respecting the various settlements and migrations of the unblended
part of the military caste
499
I. A large body of the Cuthim went off from Babel in an unmixed state, owing to the schism of the two great sects
1. These were deemed excommunicated by the others
501
....
2. Their chief settlements were in the three Caucasi; or in that conti- nuous high range of country, which stretches from the Euxine sea to
upper India, and which the Persians denominate the stony girdle of the
earth
504
II. Origin and progress of the Scuthim or Scythians
506
1. The Scythians came out of the region of Caf or Caucasus: and their
settlements extended all the way from upper India to the shores of the
Euxine
2. From Asia they passed into Europe
(1.) Here they penetrated to the utmost extremity of the west
(2.) The Germans were Scythians
(3.) But the Scythians, or Scuthim, or Cuthim, or Chusas, were the
same race as the Getes or Goths. Whence the Germans were
Goths: and, as the Indo-Scythæ or Chusas claim to this day the
patriarch Cusha as their general ancestor, the Goths were Cuths or
Cuthim
(4.) Scythians of Scandinavia
507
510
512
515
(5.) Cossacs
516
(6.) High character of the ancient Goths
3. Their opposite progress from upper India to the extreme east
517
(1.) The Chinese
(2.) The Japanese
(3.) The Cossais, the Siamese, the Peguers, the Burmans
4. Their progress to the south-west, briefly touched upon, and reserved
for a separate discussion
5. Division into castes was necessarily unknown among the unmixed
523
CHAPTER V.
Respecting the Shepherd-kings of Egypt, and the various settlements
of the military caste in consequence of their expulsion