English Feminists and Their Opponents in the 1790s: Unsex'd and Proper Females

Front Cover
Manchester University Press, 2002 - Social Science - 239 pages
Examining what 16 British women, radical and conservative, famous and notorious, wrote about their sex in the 1790s, this text offers a comprehensive survey of what women thought about love, sexual desire, women as victims, marriage, separate spheres and engagement in work, politics and society, gender, female abilities, sensibility and genius. It investigates how contemporary reviewers divided these writers into unsex'd and proper as well as the issue of whether they attempted to exclude women from certain kinds of writing. Revealing the depth of female complaint, William Stafford contends that women did not passively submit, conservative and radical alike, but sought to extend their sphere of activity, to reform men, challenge gender stereotypes and propose that a woman should be a self for herself and her God, rather than for her husband. Texts studied include material by Wollstonecraft, Hays, Macaulay, Wakefield, Edgeworth and More; historical writings by Williams; and prose fiction by Robinson, Radcliffe, Inchbald, Fenwick, Smith, West, Hamilton and Burne.
 

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

Our narratives about them
35
women as victims
74
Love marriage and the family
94
Separate spheres?
138
fashioning a self
173
Conclusion
216
Bibliography
222
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2002)

William Stafford is Professor of History at the University of Huddersfield.

Bibliographic information