Development and Democracy in India
This broad, historically grounded study examines the relationship between democratic governance and economic development in postindependence India (1947-1998). Sharma addresses the fundamental paradox of India's political economy: Why have five decades of democratically guided strategies failed to reconcile economic growth with redistribution or to mitigate the condition of extreme poverty in which some 350 to 400 million Indians - more than 40 percent of the population - live?
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
According administrative agrarian agricultural alliance areas argued authority backward Bank became benefits called capacity capital castes central central government classes Congress constitution countryside cultivators demands democracy democratic direct distribution district dominant economic effectively elections elites emergent example fact failed farm farmers forces foreign forms further given goals groups growing growth households implementation important income increased India industrial institutional interests investment labor land landless landlords landowners legislation levels limited major ment million minister needs Nehru noted organization particular party peasants percent period Planning policies political poor population position poverty problems production programs propertied rates reformist reforms regime relations relatively represented result rich rule rural sector share social society socioeconomic South Korea state's strategy structures tenants tion traditional Uttar Pradesh village World