A Practical Study of Argument
Govier's THE PRACTICAL STUDY OF ARGUMENT gives students an accessible and yet rigorous introduction to sound argumentation. Presenting an adequate amount of theory to explain why certain kinds of arguments are sound or not, and bringing this theory to life through everyday illustrations and examples, the text provides students with a comprehensive introduction to critical thinking along with a synthesis of formal and informal approaches to logic.
Important Notice: Media content referenced within the product description or the product text may not be available in the ebook version.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Pinning Down Argument Structure
Looking At Language
Good Arguments An Introduction
Premises What To Accept And Why
Working On Relevance
Deductive Arguments Categorical Logic
Deductive Arguments Propositional Logic
Other editions - View all
acceptable appeal ARG conditions argu arguer asserts Background basis beliefs cancer categorical form categorical logic categorical syllogism cause Chapter cogent committed conditional proof conductive arguments consider contain an argument context contrapositive correlation counterconsiderations deductively entail deductively valid deﬁned deﬁnition evaluate evidence example EXERCISE SET EXERCISE experience explanation fact factors fallacy fallacy of composition false ﬁnal ﬁnd ﬁom ﬁrst ﬁrst premise ﬂawed following passage formal G condition Globe and Mail human hypothesis infer inﬂuenced Internet interpretation irrelevant language logically equivalent meaning ment missing premise modus ponens modus tollens offer one’s people’s percent person plausible population position predicate primary subject priori problem propositional logic put forward question reasons reﬂect relevantly similar represent sample satisﬁed scientiﬁc sense sentence signiﬁcant slippery someone speciﬁc statistical syllogisms subargument sufﬁcient support the conclusion syllogism term things true truth table understand University Venn diagrams wrong