Reports of Cases Determined in the Courts of Appeal of the State of California: 3d series, Volume 108Bancroft-Whitney, 1980 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 82
Page 304
... Respondent . MARKS , J. - Respondent filed his action in the court below praying judgment against appellant upon a promissory note given by appellant to respondent on the nineteenth day of March , 1925 , in the principal sum of $ 1,950 ...
... Respondent . MARKS , J. - Respondent filed his action in the court below praying judgment against appellant upon a promissory note given by appellant to respondent on the nineteenth day of March , 1925 , in the principal sum of $ 1,950 ...
Page 629
... respondent . Appellant arrived in San Diego and went to the home of respondent May 15 , 1926 , and agreed to pay respondent $ 40 per month for room and board . Some time in July , 1926 , appellant suffered a paralytic stroke affecting ...
... respondent . Appellant arrived in San Diego and went to the home of respondent May 15 , 1926 , and agreed to pay respondent $ 40 per month for room and board . Some time in July , 1926 , appellant suffered a paralytic stroke affecting ...
Page 634
... Respondent . WARMER , J. , pro tem . — The facts are not in dispute . They may be briefly stated as follows : That respondent and her husband were residents of Grand Forks , North Dakota . Dr. Marsden , the appellant , and his family ...
... Respondent . WARMER , J. , pro tem . — The facts are not in dispute . They may be briefly stated as follows : That respondent and her husband were residents of Grand Forks , North Dakota . Dr. Marsden , the appellant , and his family ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed agent agreed agreement alleged amended amount Angeles answer appellant application attorney authority automobile bank California cause charged checks cited Civil claim Code Company complaint conclusion consideration considered Constitution contention contract corporation County crime damages deed defendant denied determine District effect entered error evidence execution facts filed finding further give given granted ground guilty held injuries instruction interest involved issue Judge judgment jury land lease matter ment motion negligence notice opinion paid parties payment person petition plaintiff present prior proceeding prosecution provisions purchase question reason received record recover referred rendered respondent result reversed rule statement Street sufficient Superior Court testified testimony thereof tion trial court verdict witness