Shakespeare and the Popular Tradition in the Theater: Studies in the Social Dimension of Dramatic Form and Function
Criticism based on literary or formalist conceptions of structure or on the history of ideas, Robert Weimann contends, has removed Shakespeare from the theater, and the theater from society at large. 'It is only when Elizabethan society, theater, and language are seen as interrelated that the structure of Shakespeare's dramatic art emerges as fully functional, that is, as part of a larger, and not only literary, whole.'
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Tradition of the Fool
Topsyturvydom in Ceremony and Performance
8 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
achieved acting action actor already appears associated attitudes audience awareness basic become burlesque called century character close clown comedy comic common connection considered context continuity conventions course court criticism culture developed dialogue direct drama dramatic early effect elements Elizabethan England English especially example experience expression fact festive figures follows fool function Hamlet helped holy humanist illusion important interpretation inversion involved kind King language late less London longer meaning medieval mimesis mode morality mystery myth nature noted original performance perspective platea play poetic popular tradition position present realism reality reference reflected relationship remained Renaissance representational result rhetoric Richard ritual Robin Robin Hood role scene seems sense served Shakespeare Shakespeare's theater shepherds significance social society sources speech stage structure suggests theater theatrical tion turned unity verbal Vice vision wordplay York
All Book Search results »
Christ's Body: Identity, Culture and Society in Late Medieval Writings
No preview available - 1996