Farrand v. Chicago R. R., 21 Wis. 435, Fay v. Salem Co., 111 Mass. 27, § 83. Felch v. Gilman, 22 Vt. 38, 28 54, 141, 184, 285, 329. Fellow v. Fulgham, 8 Murph. 254, % 307. Fellowes v. New Haven, 44 Conn. 240, 195. Fenelon's Petition, 7 Pa. 173, ¿ 93. 197. Ferguson v. London Rail. Co., 32 L. J. (Ch.) 29, 120. Ferree v. School District, 76 Pa. 376, ¿ 49. Ferrand v. Corporation of Bradford, 21 Beav. 412, 3 81. Fleming v. Chicago R. R., 34 Iowa, 353, 22 167, 173, 220. Fletcher v. Auburn R. R., 25 Wend.462, 88 134, 206. v. Fugate, 3 J. J. Marsh. 631, ¿ 275. v. Great Western Rail. Co., 29 L. J. (Exch.) 253, & 52. v. Peck, 6 Cranch, 87, 22 37, 348. Floyd v. Turner, 23 Texas, 292, 90. Ferris v. Bramble, 5 Ohio St. 109, Foot v. Stiles, 57 N. Y. 399, 86. v. Horicon Co., 10 Wis. 351, 2 15. v. Framingham Mfg. Co., 12 Pick. Fitch v. Stevens, 4 Metc. 426, 8 304. Foote v. Cincinnati, 11 Ohio, 408, 2 68, 69. Ford v. Chicago R. R., 14 Wis. 609, ¿ 204. v. Commissioners, 64 Me. 408, ? 223. - v. Danbury, 44 N. H. 388, 8 284. Forney v. Ralls, 30 Iowa, 559, 306. Forster v. Cumberland Valley R. R., 23 Pa. 371, 346. Foster v. Boston, 22 Pick. 33, 111. Fourth Avenue, 11 Abb. Pr. 189, 230. Fowle v. Northampton Co., 112 Mass. 334, 220. Fowler (In re), 53 N. Y. 60, ¿ 322. v. Holbrook, 17 Pick. 188, 310. Franklin v. Fisk, 13 Allen, 211, 189. 149. Freedle v. North Carolina R. R., 4 Freetown v. Bristol, 9 Pick. 46, % 99. French v. Braintree Mfg. Co., 23 Pick. 216, 290, 304. v. White, 24 Conn. 170, 8 354. Frevert v. Frifrock, 32 Ohio St. 621, 323. Friend, appellant, 53 Me. 387, 8 227. Fries v. Southern Pennsylvania R. R. & Mining Co., 85 Pa. 73, 144. Frith v. Dubuque, 45 Iowa, 406, § 203. v. Justices, 30 Ga. 723, § 228. Frost v. Earnest, 4 Whart. 86, ¿1⁄2 37, 65, 68. Fuller v. Chicopee Mfg. Co., 16 Gray, 43,296, 298. v. Edings, 11 Rich. 239, 2% 39, 87, 167. v. French, 10 Metc. 359, ? 299, 306. v. Plymouth, 15 Pick. 81, 111. Furman St. (Matter of), 17 Wend. 649, 22 173, 195, 225. Furniss v. Hudson River R. R., 5 Sandf. 551, 216. Gherkey v. Haines, 4 Blackf. 159, 8 289. Gibson v. Hammersmith Rail. Co., 32 L. J. (Ch.) 337; 2 Drew. & Sm. 603, 121. Gidney v. Earl, 12 Wend. 98, 22 51, 56. Giesy v. Cincinnati R. R., 4 Ohio St. 308, 11, 59, 86, 261. Gilbert v. Turnpike Co., 3 Johns. Cas. 107, 99, 107. Gile v. Stevens, 13 Gray, 146, 28 291, 296. Giles v. London, Chatham & Dover Rail. Co., 30 L. J. (Ch.) 603, 121. Gilkerson v. Scott, 76 Ill. 509, 255, 359. Gillan v. Hutchinson, 16 Cal. 153, ? 130. Gillespie v. Thomas, 15 Wend. 464, 22 68, 69. Gillet v. Jones, 1 Dev. & B. 339, § 291. Gilliam v. Canaday, 11 Ired. 106, ?? 291, 299. Gilligan v. Providence, 11 R. I. 258, 8 68. Gilman v. Sheboygan, 2 Black, 510, ¿ 2. v. Sheboygan R. R., 40 Wis. 653, @ 144. Giimer v. Lime Point, 18 Cal. 229, ?? 12, 347. v. Lime Point, 19 Cal. 47, 2 105. Gimble v. Stolte, Admrx., 6 Cent. L. J. 358, ¿ 74. Glennon v. Milwaukee R. R., 79 Ill. 501, 177. Gloucester v. Essex, 8 Metc. 375, 8 282. Glover v. North Staffordshire Rail. Co., 20 L. J. (Q. B.) 376, 31; 16 Q. B. 912, ¿ 207. v. Powell, 10 N. J. Eq. 211, ?? 30, 45, 81. Goddard v. Boston, 20 Pick. 407, 340. v. Worcester, 9 Gray, 88, 3 330. Gold v. Vermont Central R. R., 19 Vt. 478, 91. Goldman v. Justices, 3 Head, 107, Goodbody v. Midland Rail. Co., Irish Res. Cas. 20, 182. Goodin v. Canal Co., 18 Ohio, 169, 141. Goodwin v. Commissioners, 60 Me. 328, 8272. v. Milton, 25 N. H. 458, 22 67, 228. 237. v. Wethersfield, 43 Conn. 437, 82 229, 235, 279. Gordon v. Pennsylvania R. R., 6 Rep. 727 (Pa.), § 32. Gosling, ex parte, 4 Barn. & Adol. 596, 68. Goszler v. Georgetown, 6 Wheat. 593, ? 195. Gould v. Booth, 66 N. Y. 62, § 189. v. Glass, 19 Barb. 179, & 125. v. Hudson River R. R., 6 N. Y. 522, 82. Governors of St. Thomas Hospital v. Charing Cross Rail. Co., 30 L. J. (Ch.) 395, 120. Graff v. Mayor of Baltimore, 10 Md. 544, 22 311, 312. v. Horn, 41 Ind. 479, 33 149, 166, v. Van Driele, 24 Mich. 409, Granger v. Syracuse, 38 How. Pr. 308, 330. Grant v. Courter, 24 Barb. 232, 2. Gray v. Burlington R. R., 37 Iowa, 119, 113, 213. v. Iowa Land Co., 26 Iowa, 387, 8 202. · v. St. Paul R. R., 13 Minn. 315, 83 128, 201. Green v. Reading, 9 Watts, 382, ? 195. v. Fall River, 113 Mass. 262, § 170. Green v. Swift, 47 Cal. 536, 37. Greenville R. R. v. Nunnamaker, 4 Rich. L. 107, ¿? 218, 216. v. Partlow, 5 Rich. 428, ¿ 170, 212. Greenwood v. Wilton R. R., 23 N. H. 261, 31. Griffin v. Dogan, 48 Miss. 11, & 2. - v. Martin, 7 Barb. 297, 2 53. Grigsby v. Burtnett, 31 Cal. 406, § 126. Griscom v. Gilmore, 16 N. J. L. 105, 230. Griswold v. Bay City, 34 Mich. 452, 254. Groce v. Zumwalt, 4 Mo. 567, ₫ 305. Grosvenor v. Hampstead Junction Rail. Co., 26 L. J. (Ch.) 731, 120; 1 De G. & J. 446, § 120. Groton v. Hulburt, 22 Conn. 178, 227. Guillotte v. New Orleans, 12 La. An. Hallock v. Franklin, 2 Metc. 558, 319. v. Woolsey, 23 Wend. 328, 280. Ham v. Salem, 100 Mass. 350, 22 110, 168, 170. Hamersley v. New York, 56 N. Y. 533, 22 126, 175, 313. Hamilton Avenue, 14 Barb. 405, 39. Hamilton v. Annapolis R. R., 1 Md. Ch. 107, 1, 135, 175, 320, 323; 1 Md. 553, 88 57, 58, 59. Hammett v. Philadelphia, 65 Pa. 146, 82. Hampton v. Coffin, 4 N. H. 517, 88 51, 273. Hampton v. The Commonwealth, 19 Pa. 329, 93. Hancock v. Boston, 1 Metc. 122, § 97. Hand Gold Mining Co. v. Parker, Sup. Ct. Ga., ¿ 20. Hannibal v. Hannibal R. R., 49 Mo. 480, 45. Hannibal Bridge v. Schaubacher, 57 Mo. 582, 167; 49 Mo. 555, ? 232. Hannibal R. R. v. Rowland, 29 Mo. 337, 241. v. Morton, 27 Mo. 317, 2 159, 238, 239; 20 Mo. 70, 8 322. v. Muder, 49 Mo. 165, 23 59, 107. Hannum v. Westchester, 63 Pa. 475, 8 346. Hanson v. Lafayette, 18 La. 295, ?? 125, 322. Harbeck v. Toledo, 11 Ohio St. 219, ?? 100, 104. Hardenburgh v. Lockwood, 25 Barb. 9, 253. Harding v. Funk, 8 Kan. 315, ¿? 15, 298. 15, 287. 319. 0. Goodlett, 3 Yerg. 41, V. Medway, 10 Metc. 465, Harness v. Chesapeake Canal Co., 1 Md. Ch. 248, ?? 1, 135, 175. Harper v. Richardson, 22 Cal. 251, ?? 340, 344. v. Lexington R. R., 2 Dana, 227, 22 94, 254. Harrington v. Berkshire, 22 Pick. 263, 8 319. v. Harrington, 1 Metc. 404, 8 24. v. St. Paul R. R., 17 Minn. 215, 22 89, 90, 142, 200, 20ł. Harris v. Elliott, 10 Pet. 25, 8 51. v. Thompson, 9 Barb. 350, 2 11. Harrisburg v. Crangle, 3 Watts & S. 460, 28 49, 65, 128, 136. Harrisburg R. R. v. Moore, — Pa. —, 153. Hartshorn v. Worcester, 113 Mass 111, 198. Hartwell v. Armstrong, 19 Barb. 166, 8 16. Hartz v. St. Paul R. R., 21 Minn. 358, ¿ 90. Harvard R. R. v. Rand, 8 Cush. 218, ? 338. Harvey v. Lackawanna R. R., 47 Pa. 428, 152, 246. v. Lloyd, 3 Pa. 331, & 28. v. Thomas, 10 Watts, 63, 8 28. Harwinton v. Catlin, 19 Conn. 520, 322. Haskell v. Bristol, 9 Gray, 341, 326. v. New Bedford, 103 Mass. 208, ?? 66, 190, 358. Haslam v. Galena R. R., 64 Ill. 353, 173. Hasson v. Oil Creek R. R., 8 Phila. 556, 210. Hastings v. B. & M. R. R., 38 Iowa, 316, 22 317, 320. Haswell v. Vermont Central R. R., 23 Vt. 228, 8 76. Hatch v. Arnault, 3 La. An. 482, 51. v. Cincinnati R. R., 18 Ohio St. 92, 32, 46, 163. v. Vermont Central R. R., 25 Vt. 49, 81, 183, 220. Hatermehl v. Dickson, 8 Phila. 282, ? 126. Haverhill Bridge v. County Commissioners, 103 Mass. 120, 11, 175. Hawkins v. County Commissioners, 2 Allen, 254, 77. v. Robinson, 5 J. J. Marsh. 9, ¿ 335. v. Rochester, 1 Wend. 53, 312. Hawley v. North Staffordshire Rail. Co., 2 De G. & Sm. 33, 3 237. Hay v. Cohoes Co., 3 Barb. 42, ¿ 15. Hayes v. Ottawa R. R., 54 Ill. 373, ?? 149, 155, 158. v. Shackford, 3 N. H. 10, 3 238. Haynes v. Thomas, 7 Ind. 38, ¿ 203. Hays v. Briggs, 74 Pa. 373, 28. v. Campbell, 17 Ind. 430, 8 270. Hays v. Parrish, 52 Ind. 132, ¿? 230, 270. - v. Risher, 32 Pa. 169, 24, 28, 125. v. The State, 8 Ind. 425, ¿ 278. Hazen v. Boston R. R., 2 Gray, 574, 22 36, 116, 122, 341. v. Essex Co., 12 Cush. 475, ?? 15, 84. Heady v. Vevay Turnpike, 52 Ind. 117, 254. Healey v. Newton, 119 Mass. 480, 104. Heard v. Brooklyn, 60 N. Y. 242, 8 57. v. Middlesex Canal, 5 Metc. 81, 22 87, 217, 310. Heath v. Barman, 49 Barb. 496, 8 34. Hedrick v. Hedrick, 55 Ind. 78, 88 77, 115. Hegar v. Chicago R. R., 26 Wis. 624, 8 207. Helm v. Short, 7 Bush, 623, 2 275, Hetfield v. Central R. R., 29 N. J. L. 571, 111. Heynoman v. Blake, 19 Cal. 579, ?? 49, 85, 91. Heyward v. Mayor of New York, 7 N. Y. 314, 33 1, 50, 92. Hibbs v. Chicago R. R., 39 Iowa, 340, 23 143, 144, 148. Hickerson v. Mexico, 59 Mo. 61, 90. Hickok v. Hine, 23 Ohio St. 523, 46, 79. Hicks v. Foster, 32 Ga. 414, 256. Hidden v. Davisson, 51 Cal. 138, 75. Higbee v. Camden R. R., 19 N. J. Eq. 276, 83 32, 51, 200. Higgins v. Chicago, 18 Ill. 276, 8 145. v. Reynolds, 31 N. Y. 151, 54. Higginson v. Nahant, 11 Allen, 530, 22 18, 27. High v. Ditching Assn., 44 Ind. 356, 8 227. Hilcoat v. Archbishop of Canterbury and York, 19 L. J. (C. P.) 376, 173. Hildreth. Lowell, 11 Gray, 315, 22 16, 98, 330, 354. Hill v. Baker, 28 Me. 9, 33 235, 305. v. Bridges, 6 Port. 197, 322. v. Mohawk R. R., 5 Denio, 203, 112; 7 N. Y. 152, ¿ 112. Sayles, 12 Metc. 142, 297. Hinchman v. Paterson H. R. R., 17 N. J. Eq. 75, 23 201, 205. Hinckley, petitioner, 15 Pick. 417, ?? 103, 264. Hine v. Keokuk R. R., 42 Iowa, 636, 8 203. Hingham Bridge Co. v. Norfolk, 6 Allen, 353, 22 11, 50, 268. Hitchcock v. Danbury R. R., 25 Conn. 516, 329. Hoadley v. Waterbury, 34 Conn. 33, & 24. Hoag v. Switzer, 61 Ill. 294, 212. Hoagland v. Culvert, 20 N. J. L. 387, 83 101, 228. Hobart v. Ford, 6 Nev. 77, § 351. Hodgkinson v. Long Island R. R., 13, |