 ... three laws of robotics which have stood the test of time, and once again back up a novelette to be remembered. The Three Laws of Robotics 1 . A robot may not injure a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2. A robot...  The Illusion of Conscious Will - Page 339by Daniel M. Wegner - 2002 - 405 pagesLimited preview - About this book
 | E. Mendelsohn, H. Nowotny - History - 1984 - 332 pages
...inaction, allow a human being to come to harm; (2) A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law; (3) A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. These laws are written into... | |
 | James Burke - Electronic government information - 1985 - 116 pages
...through inaction, allow a human to come to harm. 2. A robot must obey orders given to him by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. 3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. None of these laws is interesting... | |
 | James Burke - Electronic government information - 1985 - 108 pages
...through inaction, allow a human to come to harm. 2. A robot must obey orders given to him by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. 3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. None of these laws is interesting... | |
 | Ronald Chrisley, Sander Begeer - Computers - 2000 - 464 pages
...human being to come to harm. 2. A robot must obey orders given it by humans except when such orders conflict with the first law. 3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the first or second laws. 318 These, of course, are... | |
 | Gill Kirkup - History - 2000 - 352 pages
...inaction, allow a human heing to come to harm; 2. A rohot must ohev the orders given it hv human heings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law; 3. A rohot must protect its own existence as long as such protection ilocs not conflict w ith the First... | |
 | Jonathan Hill - Architecture - 2001 - 270 pages
...inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2 A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. 3 A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. This huge philosophical... | |
 | Justin Wintle - Biography & Autobiography - 2002 - 628 pages
...inaction, allow a human being to come to harm; (2) a robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law; (3) a robot must protect its own existence, as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. The Foundation trilogy,... | |
 | Rick Dove - Business & Economics - 2002 - 368 pages
...inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. 3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. Asimov's many books repeatedly... | |
 | Jerome Franklin Shapiro - Motion pictures - 2002 - 412 pages
...to come to harm; (2) A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders conflict with the first law; (3) A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the first or second laws. See Prawer, Caligan's Children,... | |
 | Tadashi Kitamura - Computers - 2001 - 332 pages
...come to harm;" 2. "a robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except should such orders conflict with the first law;" 3. "a robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the other two laws". relation to present technical... | |
| |
