Riverton Extension Unit, Missouri River Basin Project: Hearings, Ninetieth Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 3062 ... May 17, 1968, Volumes 8-14U.S. Government Printing Office, 1968 - 115 pages Committee Serial No. 90-27. Considers H.R. 3062, to authorize the inclusion of the Riverton extension unit in the Missouri River Basin Project. |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acreage acres of class agricultural amendatory repayment contract amount ANGLEN annual ASPINALL authorized BARNES benefit-cost ratio benefits bill BOGACZ Bureau of Reclamation BURTON of Utah canals and laterals Chairman Commissioners committee CONGRESS THE LIBRARY conservation construction costs DAVISON DONELSON drainage economic farm units Federal Government fish and wildlife Fremont County gentleman going hearings irrigable acres irrigable land JOHNSON land classes lateral lining leased legislation LIBRARY OF CONGRESS MCFARLAND ment Midvale area Midvale District Midvale farmers Midvale Irrigation District Missouri River Basin operation and maintenance paid Paul Leonhardt Pavillion payment picture private ownership problems production proposed purchase record rehabilitation and betterment repaid repayment period River Basin project Riverton extension unit Riverton Project Riverton Reclamation Project Riverton unit Shoshoni soil STAMM statement STEIGER of Arizona structures Subsection Thank third division lands tile drains tion water users WHITE Wind River Wyoming
Popular passages
Page 2 - Stat. 89), is further amended by adding a new subsection at the end to read as follows: "(i) The Commission shall have the power to make such rules and regulations as are necessary to carry out the purposes of this Act.
Page 40 - Of this additional authorization how much are the users going to pay — the irrigators, the domestic users ? Mr. STAMM. The water users will repay nearly 17 percent of the irrigation investment against the irrigable land of the combined unit Mr. ASPINALL. That is not the question I asked you. Mr. STAMM. And the dollars that the water users will repay within 50 years total $4,152,330. Mr. ASPINALL. That is not the question I asked you. The question I asked you was, out of this additional appropriation...
Page 33 - Federal investments allocable to navigation, flood control, or for fish and wildlife protection established as reimbursable should be repaid to the Treasury of the United States within 50 years of completion of the project. Such payments should be made annually but need not necessarily be in equal amounts. The total obligation could be paid at any time, on the basis of the present worth of the deferred payments with interest computed at the long-term loan rate currently being paid by the...
Page 102 - At the present time, if it is all right with you, Mr. Chairman, I would like to refer to the slides and make my statement a part of the record.
Page 85 - A total of $22,071 was bid for 18 of the advertised units in 1967. This is an average of $11.30 per irrigated acre for the land and water charges. The Bureau of Reclamation has received from the permittees over a 4-year leasing period, 1965 through 1968, the sum of $311,591.80 for lease rentals and water charges from the permittees. At this time I would like to enter into the record a schedule showing the Bureau's leasing experience on third division lands for the years 1965, 1966, 1967, and 1968....
Page 2 - SEC. 6. Appropriations heretofore or hereafter made for carrying on the functions of the Bureau of Reclamation shall be available in an amount of not more than $2,000,000 for the acquisition of lands as provided in section l(a) of this Act and for additional drainage facilities, canal lining, and structure replacements: Provided, That all miscellaneous net revenues received from the sale of lands under section l(b) of...
Page 26 - Stat. 969). It was placed under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Reclamation by the Act of June 5, 1920 (41 Stat. 874, 915) ; the first and second divisions of the project, encompassing some 45,000 acres of irrigable land, were brought in during the next 20 years. The general plan of development of the third division of the project was reauthorized by the Flood Control Act of 1944...
Page 8 - Is there any objection? Hearing none, it is so ordered. [The statements referred to follow :] STATEMENT OF HON.
Page 99 - Be it enacted by the Senate anil House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That this Act may be cited as the "Defense Production Act Amendments of 1953".
Page 23 - FKOM THE STATE OF WYOMING Senator HANSEN. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. interest in a bill which is of vital importance to the State of Wyoming. I am not going to take up your time by going into the facets of the bill. It was my privilege to chair part of the hearings in the Senate on the companion bill to which allusion has already been made, S. 670. The representatives here from the Midvale project, who will testify and explain in detail the ramifications of this bill and the problems incident to the...