The Federal Reporter: With Key-number Annotations ..., Volume 289West Publishing Company, 1923 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 5
Taxation 8-61 I (8)—Dismissal of Injunction suit without prejudice. costs for the
defendant in error. LONG v. NORMAN et al. (Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit
. May 15, 1923.) No. 1627. 1. Taxation 6-608(2)—Injunction not authorized on
sole ...
Taxation 8-61 I (8)—Dismissal of Injunction suit without prejudice. costs for the
defendant in error. LONG v. NORMAN et al. (Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit
. May 15, 1923.) No. 1627. 1. Taxation 6-608(2)—Injunction not authorized on
sole ...
Page 6
Taxation 8-61 I (8)—Dismissal of Injunction suit without prejudice to enable
plaintiff to sue at law to test validity of tax. A suit for injunction to restrain the illegal
assessment by state authorities of property of a person claiming domicile without
the ...
Taxation 8-61 I (8)—Dismissal of Injunction suit without prejudice to enable
plaintiff to sue at law to test validity of tax. A suit for injunction to restrain the illegal
assessment by state authorities of property of a person claiming domicile without
the ...
Page 51
Appeal and error 3-138—Consolidation of suits does not entitle party to one suit
to appeal from an order made in the other. Strangers to a suit are not entitled to
appeal from the orders and judgment entered therein, and the consolidation of a
...
Appeal and error 3-138—Consolidation of suits does not entitle party to one suit
to appeal from an order made in the other. Strangers to a suit are not entitled to
appeal from the orders and judgment entered therein, and the consolidation of a
...
Page 52
On April 15, 1921, the Logan Trust Company, appellee herein, by permission of
the court in which the creditors' suit was ... the court made an order in the
foreclosure suit extending the receivership to that suit, and consolidating the two
suits.
On April 15, 1921, the Logan Trust Company, appellee herein, by permission of
the court in which the creditors' suit was ... the court made an order in the
foreclosure suit extending the receivership to that suit, and consolidating the two
suits.
Page 53
Taking up these grounds in their order: [1] (1) The order denying appellants'
petitions to intervene in the foreclosure suit is not subject to review at this time.
The order was made July 2, 1921. If appealable, the time for appeal expired six
months ...
Taking up these grounds in their order: [1] (1) The order denying appellants'
petitions to intervene in the foreclosure suit is not subject to review at this time.
The order was made July 2, 1921. If appealable, the time for appeal expired six
months ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed agreed alleged amount Appeals application assignment authority bank bankrupt bankruptcy bill bonds cause charge Circuit Circuit Judge City claim Comp Company conclusion condition construction contract corporation counts creditors damages debts decision defendant denied District Court District Judge effect entitled equity error evidence exception fact federal FEDERAL REPORTER filed finding follows further give given ground held intent interest issue Judge judgment jury land lease lien liquor March matter necessary notes objection officers operation opinion owner paid parties partnership patent payment person petition plaintiff possession present proceedings purchase question reason received record referred relation REPORTER rule ship statement statute suit taken testimony tion trial trustee United verdict vessel warrant witness
Popular passages
Page 273 - For value received hereby sell, assign and transfer unto ^ shares of the capital stock represented by the within certificate and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named company with full power of substitution in the premises.
Page 289 - Stat. 704, 705, amended the act of 1910 to readThat whenever an invention described in and covered by a patent of the United States shall hereafter be used or manufactured by or for the United States...
Page 389 - Court of the District of Columbia, or in the district court of the United States for the district in which such claimant resides, or, if a corporation, where it has its principal place of business...
Page 516 - Court ; and no civil suit shall be brought before either of said courts against any person by any original process or proceeding in any other district than that whereof he is an inhabitant...
Page 197 - Education, or school district shall incur any indebtedness or liability in any manner, or for any purpose, exceeding in any year the income and revenue provided for it for such year, without the assent of two-thirds of the qualified electors thereof, voting at an election to be held for that purpose...
Page 699 - ... in the absence of actual fraud in the transaction, the judgment of the directors as to the value of the property purchased shall be conclusive...
Page 448 - ... the Alien Property Custodian, or required so to be, or seized by him shall be that provided by the terms of this Act, and in the event of sale or other disposition of such property by the Alien Property Custodian, shall be limited to and enforced against the net proceeds received therefrom and held by the Alien Property Custodian or by the Treasurer of the United States.
Page 183 - First. If any substance has been mixed and packed with it so as to reduce or lower or injuriously affect its quality or strength.
Page 289 - ... shall hereafter be used by the United States without license of the owner thereof or lawful right to use the same, such owner may recover reasonable compensation for such use by suit in the Court of Claims.
Page 258 - SEC. 3. A search warrant can not be issued but upon probable cause, supported by affidavit, naming or describing the person and particularly describing the property and the place to be searched.