False Advertising and the Lanham Act: Litigating Section 43(a)(1)(B)

Front Cover
OUP USA, Jun 28, 2012 - Law - 147 pages
1 Review
Section 43 of the Lanham Act is an invaluable tool for intellectual property and commercial litigators. It includes causes of action for trademark infringement-type "passing off" claims, false advertising, trademark dilution, and domain-name cyberpiracy. It is the cornerstone for civil litigants seeking redress for competition-related torts in federal courts. However, Section 43(a) is not a general catch-all for commercial grievances, and is arguably the most misinterpreted and misapplied subsection in the Lanham Act, despite having an extensive body of case law delineating specific causes of action and proofs. Practitioners are well-advised to grasp its nuances before proceeding under the banner of "unfair competition." In False Advertising and the Lanham Act: Litigating Section 43(a)(1)(B), Thomas Williams addresses false advertising claims under Section 43(a)(1)(B) of the Lanham Act. The book covers established precedent and Section 43(a) false advertising case law, including key decisions where courts have developed essential analytical tools to flesh out sparse statutory language. The book is organized by topic. Chapter One describes actionable claims under Section 43(a)(1)(B), and includes an analysis of the Supreme Court's Dastar opinion, which sets important boundaries for Section 43(a) claims. Chapter Two identifies various tests for Section 43(a)(1)(B) standing, including the circuit split on whether antitrust-based standing rules are applicable to false advertising claims. Chapter Three analyzes each of the requisite Skil factors for establishing a false advertising claim. Chapter Four addresses Section 43(a)(1)(B) pleadings, including the impact of the Supreme Court's Twombly and Iqbal decisions on notice pleading rules. Chapter Five examines defenses to false advertising claims. Chapter Six reviews injunctive relief requirements and Chapter Seven outlines monetary relief available to prevailing parties.

What people are saying - Write a review

LibraryThing Review

User Review  - rivkat - LibraryThing

Oxford sent me a review copy of this short, practice-oriented book. If Lanham Act cases are core elements of your practice, this book is not for you, but it might be a useful reference for in-house ... Read full review

Other editions - View all

About the author (2012)

Thomas M. Williams is a partner in the Chicago office of Winston & Strawn LLP, where he specializes in trademark and unfair competition litigation, as well as trademark prosecution and counseling. His practice entails representing clients in federal district and appellate courts, and before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the USPTO, as well as in alternative dispute resolution proceedings. He has extensive experience representing clients in unfair competition disputes involving advertising claims and passing-off. Thomas Williams has written many articles and is a frequent speaker on the subject of trademark and unfair competition law and practice.

Bibliographic information