EQUITY RULES. See Procedure, 1.

EQUIVALENCY. See Patents for Inventions, 7.

ESTOPPEL. See Patents for Inventions, 6.

EVIDENCE. See Anti-Trust Acts, 3-4; Employers' Liability Act,
4-5; 'Packers and Stockyards Act, 3, 7-8, 10; Patents for In-
ventions, 3.

EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS.

Title of Residuary Legatee. Right to share vests immediately
upon testator's death and title under decree of distribution relates
back. Brewster v. Gage, 327.

EXEMPTIONS. See Constitutional Law, I, 3.

EXPROPRIATION. See Constitutional Law, V, 13-14.
FARM LOAN ACT.

Stockholders' Liability. Board has no power to levy assessment,
or receiver to maintain suit, to enforce liability created by Act.
Wheeler v. Greene, 49.

FEDERAL CONTROL ACT. See Parties, 2.

FEDERAL FARM LOAN ACT. See Farm Loan Act.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.

1. Public Interest. Prerequisite to proceeding for restraint of
unfair method of competition. Federal Trade Comm'n v.
Klesner, 19.

2. Id. Section 5 of Act does not provide remedy for private
wrongs. Id.

3. Id. Duty of Commission to dismiss complaint and of courts
to refuse enforcement of desist order where interest purely
private. Id.

4. Conclusiveness of Order. Order not enforcible if findings not
supported by evidence. International Shoe Co. v. Federal Trade
Comm'n, 291.

FEDERAL WATER POWER ACT. See Navigable Waters.
FIRES. See Negligence, 2.

FRANCHISES. See Municipal Corporations.

FRIVOLOUS APPEAL. See Jurisdiction, II, (F), 1.

GIFTS. See Constitutional Law, I, 1; V, 3.

81325°-30 40

HEIRS. See Parties, 4; Trusts, 1.

HOMESTEAD LAWS. See Indians, 1-3.

HUSBAND AND WIFE. See Constitutional Law, II; V, 12;
Jurisdiction, IV, 2.

INDIANS.

1. Indian Homestead Act. Congress has power to extend trust
period any time before issuance of patent in fee. United States
v. Jackson, 183.

2. Id. Extension of trust period under Act of 1906 does not
impair vested rights. Id.

3. Id. Provision of Act of 1906 for extension of trust period
has no application to acquisition of rights under the general
homestead laws by Indians entering land as citizens. Id.

4. Tax Exemptions. Agreements with Government are to be
liberally construed in favor of the Indians. Carpenter v. Shaw,
363.

5. Id. Provision in "Atoka Agreement" of August 24, 1898, to
be construed in sense naturally understood by Indians and may
not be narrowed by subsequently declared intention of Congress.
Id.

6. Id. Section 9814, Comp. Stats., Okla., 1921, imposing tax
upon owner of royalty interest in mineral lands, held violation of
"Atoka Agreement." Id.

INFANTS. See Banks and Banking, 34.

INFRINGEMENT. See Patents for Inventions, 8.

INJUNCTION. See Jurisdiction.

When Proper Remedy. Does not lie to recover possession of
real estate. White v. Sparkill Realty Corp., 500.

INSOLVENCY.

Priority of United States. R. S., § 3466, does not apply to
indebtedness of railroads to United States arising under Trans-
portation Act of 1920, §§ 207, 209, 210. United States v.
Guaranty Trust Co., 478.

INSURANCE. See Constitutional Law, V, 6.

Agents. State regulation and licensing in respect to appoint-
ment. Herbring v. Lee, 111.

INTERNATIONAL LAW. See Constitutional Law, II; Mails.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE. See Constitutional Law, III; Inter-
state Commerce Acts.

INTERSTATE COMMERCE ACTS See Anti-Trust Acts; Em-

ployers' Liability Act; Insolvency.

1. Character of Commerce. Whether shipment is intrastate or
foreign determined by essential character. United States v. Erie
R. Co., 98.

2. Extension of Line. Order denying application for, held not
subject to review. Piedmont & Nor. Ry. Co. v. United States,
469.

3. Id. Remedy in substance a declaratory judgment that carrier
is not subject to authority of Commission, held not within juris-
diction of federal courts. Id.

4. Intrastate Rates. Commission has jurisdiction to establish,
where shipment is in foreign commerce. United States v. Erie R.
Co., 98.

5. Passenger Terminals. Commission has no power to compel
carriers to abandon existing terminals and construct new union
station. Interstate Commerce Comm'n v. U. S. ex rel. Los
Angeles, 52.

INTERSTATE

COMMERCE

COMMISSION. See Interstate

Commerce Acts.

JOINT STOCK LAND BANKS. See Farm Loan Act.

JUDGMENTS. See Packers and Stockyards Act; Parties, 2-3;
Patents for Inventions, 5-6; Receivers, 2; Verdict.

JUDICIAL NOTICE. See Public Utilities, 6.

JURISDICTION. See Federal Trade Commission; Packers and
Stockyards Act; Procedure.

I. In General, p. 629.

II. Jurisdiction of This Court.

(A) Cenerally, p. 629.

(B) Over Circuit Courts of Appeals, p. 630.

(C) Ovc. District Courts, p. 630.

(D) Over Court of Claims, p. 630.

(E) Over Supreme Court of Philippine Islands, p. 630.

(F) Over State Courts, p. 630.

III. Jurisdiction of Circuit Courts of Appeals, p. 631.

IV. Jurisdiction of District Courts, p. 631.

V. Jurisdiction of Court of Appeals, District of Columbia, p. 632.
VI. Jurisdiction of Supreme Court of Philippine Islands, p. 632.

JURISDICTION-Continued.

VII. Jurisdiction of State Courts, p. 632.

References to particular subjects under this title:

Accounting. VI, 2.

Administrative Officer. II, (A), 13.
Amount in Controversy. II, (E).
Appeal. II, (A), 3; II, (D); III, 2.
Assignments of Error. II, (A), 10.
Board of Tax Appeals. III, 1.
Certiorari. II, (A), 4, 5; II, (E).
Clayton Act. II, (A), 11.
Consuls. IV, 2.

Courts. II, (A), 12; IV, 5, 6; VII.

Declaratory Judgment. I, 2.

Diplomatic Officers. IV, 2.

Dismissal. II, (B); II, (C); IV, 10; V.

Diversity of Citizenship. III, 2.

Divorce. IV, 2.

Ecclesiastical Tribunals. I, 1; VI, , 1.

Ejectment. IV, 4.

Employers Liability. II, (A), 4.

Federal Agents. II, (A), 1, 5.

Federal Question. II, (F), 1; III, 2; IV, 1.

Federal Trade Commission. II, (A), 11; V.

Finality of Judgments. II, (F), 2.

Frivolous Appeal. II, (F), 1.

Injunction. II, (A), 12; III, 2; IV, 4, 5.

Interstate Commerce. I, 2, 3; II, (A), 8; IV, 3.

Mandamus. I, 3; II, (A), 12, 13.

Parties. II, (A), 1, 5, 6; II, (B); VI, 1.

Public Utilities. II, (A), 10.

Railroads. I, 2.

Receivers. IV, 7; VII.

Return Day. II, (A), 7.

Scope of Review. II, (A), 7-11.

Service by Publication. II, (A), 7.

State Courts. II, (A), 7; II, (F).

Taxation. II, (A), 8.

Three-Judge Court. II, (A), 12; IV, 5.

Time for Review. II, (A), 1, 2, 6.

Transfer to Law Side. IV, 9, 10.

Transportation Act. II, (A), 2.

Trusts. VI, 2.

JURISDICTION-Continued.

I. In General.

1. Ecclesiastical Tribunals.

Power of, and of civil courts, in en-

forcing trusts. Gonzalez v. Archbishop, 1.

2. Declaratory Judgment. Federal courts without jurisdiction to
render, holding railway within exemption of par. 22 of Inter-
state Commerce Act. Piedmont & Nor. Ry. Co. v. United
States, 469.

3. Mandamus. Whether action of Interstate Commerce Commis-
sion may be controlled or corrected by mandamus need not be
determined where not proper remedy. Interstate Commerce
Comm'n v. U. S. ex rel. Los Angeles, 52.

II. Jurisdiction of this Court.

(A) Generally.

1. Time Within Which Review May be Invoked. Federal
Agent's successor in office can not be substituted after time has
expired. Davis v. Preston, 406.

2. Id. Section 206 of Transportation Act does not alter statu-
tory period for invoking reviewing power of this Court. Id.
3. Appeal. Cause held properly here on appeal. Safe Deposit
& Tr. Co. v. Virginia, 83.

4. Certiorari. Would not have issued to review judgment of
state court in employers liability case where injuries were re-
ceived after termination of employment. Chesapeake & O. R.
Co. v. Bryant, 404.

5. Id. Grant of on application of former Federal Agent and
surety on appeal bonds, held improvident where official status
of Agent had ceased. Davis v. Preston, 406.

6. Substitution of Parties. Can not be made here upon motion
after statutory time allowed for application to review has ex-
pired. Id.

7. Scope of Review. Construction by state court of condemna-
tion statute, with respect to when service by publication is com-
plete and as to manner of fixing return day, accepted here.
Wick v. Chelan Electric Co., 108.

8. Id. This Court not bound by legislative or judicial designa-
tion of state tax law which actually operates as burden on
interstate commerce. New Jersey Bell Tel. Co. v. State Board of
Taxes, 338.

9. Id. This Court not bound by legislative or judicial desig-
nation of state tax law challenged as violating rights asserted
under federal laws. Carpenter v. Shaw, 363.