American Counterinsurgency: Human Science and the Human Terrain
Politicians, pundits, and Pentagon officials are singing the praises of a kinder, gentler American counterinsurgency. Some claim that counterinsurgency is so sophisticated and effective that it is the “graduate level of war.” Private military contracting firms have jumped on the bandwagon, and many have begun employing anthropologists, political scientists, psychologists, and sociologists to help meet the Department of Defense’s new demand. The $60 million Human Terrain System (HTS), an intelligence gathering program that embeds social scientists with combat brigades in Iraq and Afghanistan, dramatically illustrates the approach. But when the military, transnational corporations, and the human sciences become obsessed with controlling the “human terrain”—the civilian populations of Iraq and Afghanistan—what are the consequences? In this timely pamphlet, Roberto González offers a searing critique of HTS, showing how the history of anthropology can be used to illuminate the problems of turning “culture” into a military tool.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Origins of Human Terrain
Phoenix Rising? The Birth of HTS 1
Social Science and the Imperial Imperative
1 other sections not shown
According actions administration Afghans agencies American analysis analysts anthropologists approach Arab Army authors began brigade British called Center century Chapter civil civilian collection Colonel colonial combat commanders concerned conducted CORDS Corporation counterinsurgency create critical cultural database Defense Department economic effects effort embedded empire employed enemy example experience fact Figure forces former funded future groups HTT members human terrain idea insurgents intelligence Iraq Iraq and Afghanistan Iraqi kill knowledge Lawrence leaders lives MAP-HT mapping military native noted Office operations Paradigm participants Pentagon personnel Phoenix planning political population question region reports response role rule scientists social science social scientists society soldiers sources Special success suggested System tactical teams term terror terrorist tion tribal tribes troops understand units Vietnam warfare weapon