...their opinion, that Connecticut had no right to the lands in controverfy ; and that the jurifdiction and pre-emption of all the territory lying within the charter boundary of Pennfylvania, claimed by Connecticut, did of right belong to Pennfylvania. Their proceedings and fentence...

...opinion., the ftate of Connecticut had no right to the hnds in Controverfy ; but that the jurifdiflion and preemption of all the. territory lying within the charter boundary of Penfylvania, then claimed by Conneclicut, of right belonged toPenfylvan'u — This decifion terminated...

...opinion the ftate of Connecticut had no right to the lands iii controverfy 5 but that thejurifdiction and preemption of all the territory lying within the charter boundary of Pennfylvania, then claimed by Connecticut, of "right belonged to Pennfylvania — This decifion terminated...

...their Unanimous opinion, the state of Connecticut had RO right to the lands in controversy ; but i.hat the jurisdiction and preemption of all the territory...lying within the charter boundary of Pennsylvania, then cUimed by Connecticut, of right belonged to Pennsylvania — This decision terminated the controversy...

...opinion, the ftate of Connecticut had no right to the lands in controverfy ; but that the jurifdiction and preemption of all the territory lying within the charter boundary of Pennfylvania, then claimed by Connecticut, of right belonged to Pennfylvania — This decifion terminated...

...was their unanimous opinion, the state of Connecticut had no right to the lands in controversy ; but that the jurisdiction and preemption of all the territory...lying within the charter boundary of Pennsylvania, then claimed by Connecticut, of right belonged to Pennsylvania—This decision terminated the controversy...

...unanimously of opinion, that the state of Connecticut had no right to the lands in controversy, and that the jurisdiction and pre-emption of all the territory,...lying within the charter boundary of Pennsylvania, and claimed by Connecticut, belonged of right to the former. Some difficulties subsequently occurred relative...

...cause has been well argued by the learned counsel on both sides. We are unanimously of opinion, tbat the state of Connecticut has no right to the lands...charter boundary of Pennsylvania, and now claimed by 11n. state of Connecticut, do of right belong to the state of Pennsylvania. WM. WHIPPLE, WELCOME ARNOLD,...

...argued by the learned counsel on both sides. The court are now to pronounce their sentence or judgment. We are unanimously of opinion, that the state of Connecticut has no right to the lands in controversy. We ire also unanimously of opinion, that the jurisdiction and pre-emption of all the territ6ry lying within...

...was their unanimous opinion, the State of Connecticut had no right to the lands in controversy ; but that the jurisdiction and preemption of all the territory lying within the charter bounds of Pennsylvania, then claimed by Connecticut, ofright belonged to Pennsylvania — This decision...