Document [59th-75th Congress] ...U.S. Government Printing Office - Harbors |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 8
... cost for new work of $ 584,366 , and no increased cost of maintenance , subject to the condition that no dredging shall be done by the Federal Government within 50 feet of an established pierhead line , wharf or structure , and provided ...
... cost for new work of $ 584,366 , and no increased cost of maintenance , subject to the condition that no dredging shall be done by the Federal Government within 50 feet of an established pierhead line , wharf or structure , and provided ...
Page 14
... cost of the project and the necessary rights - of - way and spoil - disposal areas had been furnished free of cost to the United States . ( d ) That no work should be undertaken on the channel to Port Isabel until the sum of $ 450,000 ...
... cost of the project and the necessary rights - of - way and spoil - disposal areas had been furnished free of cost to the United States . ( d ) That no work should be undertaken on the channel to Port Isabel until the sum of $ 450,000 ...
Page 15
... cost of $ 41,899.33 . In February and March 1936 the point between the Port Isabel and Brownsville Channels was dredged away at a total cost of $ 18,305.31 . Subsequent to its completion in February 1936 a dredge was employed in ...
... cost of $ 41,899.33 . In February and March 1936 the point between the Port Isabel and Brownsville Channels was dredged away at a total cost of $ 18,305.31 . Subsequent to its completion in February 1936 a dredge was employed in ...
Page 5
... cost of the jetty proposed by the Shore Protection Board at $ 759,000 , with $ 10,000 annually for maintenance during the first 5 years , and $ 5,000 annually there- after . Assuming a local contribution of $ 100,000 toward the initial cost ...
... cost of the jetty proposed by the Shore Protection Board at $ 759,000 , with $ 10,000 annually for maintenance during the first 5 years , and $ 5,000 annually there- after . Assuming a local contribution of $ 100,000 toward the initial cost ...
Page 9
... cost of such improve- ment to be $ 759,000 , with an annual cost of maintenance of $ 10,000 for the first 5 years and $ 5,000 thereafter . The necessary aids to navigation are estimated by the Lighthouse Department to cost $ 3,400 ...
... cost of such improve- ment to be $ 759,000 , with an annual cost of maintenance of $ 10,000 for the first 5 years and $ 5,000 thereafter . The necessary aids to navigation are estimated by the Lighthouse Department to cost $ 3,400 ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
100 feet wide 12 feet 30 feet additional anchorage annual cost Arecibo average Avery Island barges Bayou Petit Anse benefits Board of Engineers boats breakwater bulkhead capacity Cashie River Chief of Engineers coal Coan River commerce Committee on Rivers Congress construction County Creek damages depth district engineer division engineer draft drainage district dredging Engineers for Rivers entrance channel estimated cost existing project Federal feet deep fishing Flushing Bay freight Harbor Act highway hydro increase Indian River Indian River Bay interests intracoastal waterway jetty kilowatt kilowatt-hour land load factor located mean low water ment miles Mississippi River Mobile River modified mouth navigation Neah Bay operation Pass Cavallo percent plant pool Port Isabel Port Lavaca present proposed pumping recommended requested Rivers and Harbors savings ships shoals shore steam submitted terminal facilities tion tonnage tons traffic turning basin United vessels wharf wharves widening width yacht
Popular passages
Page 4 - Resolved by the Committee on Rivers and Harbors of the House of Representatives, United States, that the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors created under section 3 of the River and Harbor Act, approved June 13...
Page 9 - Resolved by the Committee on Public Works of the United States Senate, That the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors, created under Section 3, of the River and Harbor Act, approved June 13, 1902, be, and is hereby, requested to review the report of the Chief of Engineers on the Susquehanna River and tributaries.