United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volume 333United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1948 - Courts |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accused affirmed amicus curiae appellees applied argued the cause Assistant Attorney Attorney General Quinn basing point Board cement Certiorari denied charged Circuit Court claim clause collateral estoppel Commission Company competition Cong Congress Constitution contempt convicted Corp corporation counsel Court of Appeals crime criminal decision defendants dissenting District Court due process Erdahl escheat evidence fact Federal Trade Comm'n Federal Trade Commission filed Fourteenth Amendment FRANKFURTER Government granted Harlan Stone held Hepburn Act Illinois interest issue judge judgment judicial jurisdiction JUSTICE legislation license agreements manufacture ment Misc monopoly Norris-LaGuardia Act Opinion patent person petition petitioner pro se proceedings provision punishment question Ragen railroad Religious Education Reported res judicata residence respondents royalties rule Scophony sentence Sess Sherman Act Sixth Amendment Solicitor General Perlman South Carolina Stat statute Supp supra Supreme Court tion trial court turnover order United States Gypsum validity verdict violation York
Popular passages
Page 209 - Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect "a wall of separation between church and State.
Page 134 - ... in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art or science to which it appertains, or with which it is most iiearly connected, to make, construct, compound, and use the same...
Page 675 - ... proper charge, and convicted upon incompetent evidence, or evidence irrelevant to the issue or otherwise inadmissible. He lacks both the skill and knowledge adequately to prepare his defense, even though he have a perfect one. He requires the guiding hand of counsel at every step in the proceedings against him. Without it, though he be not guilty, he faces the danger of conviction because he does not know how to establish his innocence.
Page 651 - Amendment provides, among other things, that no person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime unless on presentment or indictment of a grand jury.
Page 328 - Provided also, and be it declared and enacted: That any declaration before mentioned shall not extend to any letters patent and grants of privilege, for the term of fourteen years or under, hereafter to be made, of the sole working or making of any manner of new manufactures, within this realm, to the true and first inventor and inventors of such manufactures...
Page 727 - Upon proof being made, at any hearing on a complaint under this section, that there has been discrimination in price or services or facilities furnished, the burden of rebutting the prima-facie case thus made by showing justification shall be upon the person charged with a violation of this section, and unless justification shall be affirmatively shown, the commission is authorized to issue an order terminating the discrimination: Provided, however, That nothing herein contained shall prevent a seller...
Page 674 - The right to be heard would be, in many cases, of little avail if it did not comprehend the right to be heard by counsel.
Page 330 - Any person who has invented or discovered any new and useful art, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvements thereof...
Page 329 - ... any manner of new manufactures within this realm to the true and first inventor and inventors of such manufactures, which others at the time of making such letters...
Page 208 - This is beyond all question a utilization of the tax-established and taxsupported public school system to aid religious groups to spread their faith. And it falls squarely under the ban of the First Amendment (made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth) as we interpreted it in Everson v.