Page images
PDF
EPUB

REPORTS

OF

CASES

ARGUED AND DETERMINED

PARVARD

LAW SCHOOL
SUPREME COURT

OF THE

STATE OF VERMONT.

REPORTED BY THE JUDGES OF SAID COURT, AGREEABLY TO A STATUTE

LAW OF THE STATE.

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

JUSTICES OF THESIPREME COURT, AND EX OFFICIO CHANCELLORS OF THE COURT OF CHANCERY, DURING THE TIME

EMBRACED IN THESE REPORTS.

CHARLES K. WILLIAMS, Chief Justice.

STEPHEN ROYCE
SAMUEL S. PHELPS, (
JACOB COLLAMERAS

Assistant Justices.
ISAAC F. REDFIELD,

ERRATA.

Page 17, line 5, from bottom for “provde" read proceed.

- 28 " 12 " top for “on” read an. “ 139 " 6 “ bottom, for “ pcar” read to appear. " 136 " 6 " " for " for read far. " 160 " 1 " " for "al” read altho. " 224 " 15 " top for “legislation” read legislature. 1 232 16 8 " bottom for "collison” read collusion. " 281 " 14 " top for “iltera” read litera. 16 377 " 24 16 " for "17836" read 1826. " 398 " 13" bottom for “ soimemportance" read no importance. " 301 " 13 " top in note for "avoidable" read available. " 317 " 13 " " for "sveas" read saves. " 401 " 9 " bottom for "so" read to. + 381 " 10 " bottom for "no" read an. " 290 in marginal note for “ Price” road Prince.

AN

ALPHABETICAL TABLE

OF THE

NAMES OF CASES COMPRISED IN THIS VOLUME.

130

Adams, Graves, vs.
Adams, Sawyer, et. al. vs.
Adams vs. Newell,
Adams vs. Newfane,
Aldis Ex. vs. Burdick,
Allard, vs. Bingham,
Allen, vs. Hall,
Appleton, et. al. vs. Edson,
Arnold, et. al. Bliss vs.
Austin, Gaffery vs.
Avery, et. al. Lewis, vs.

146 209

[ocr errors]

Brown vs Marsh,

310 Bryant vs. Edson,

325 172 Burdick, Aldis Ex. vs.

21 190 Burnham, Warden vs.

390 271

Cartier vs. Page,
21
470

Castleton vs. Miner, et al.
34
Chaffee, Rublee vs.

111 239 Chamberlain vs. Hopps, et. al.

94 Chipman, Pierce vs.

334 70 Clark vs Foster,

98 Clark, Rice vs.

104 287 Clark Rice vs.

109 Clark, vs. Lyman,

290 256 Cloyes, et. al. Irish vs.

30 90 Colony vs. Maeck,

114 410 Cook, et. al. Converse vs. 164 246 Conant, Snow vs.

301 463 Converse vs. Cook, et. al. 164

79 Corliss vs. Corliss, 272 Craigie, Harding, vs.

501 243 Crooker, et.al. Fletcher et.al. vs. 314 151 Cushing vs. Hale,

38 445 470 Davis vs. Barton,

246 400 Day el. al. Lainb vs. 252 Day et. al. vs. Roberts,

413 472 Delaware vs. Staunton, 284 Ditty Spear vs.

419 243 Downer, Steward vs.

320 264 Downer, et. al, State vs. 194 Dudley, Wood vs.

430 485 Dutton, Putnam vs.

396 284 Dyar vs. Jones,

205

Baldsia vs. Rupert, Barlow, Ferriss vs. Barker, Wallace et. al. vs. Barton, Davis vs. Bellamy, Mottocks vs. Bellows, Learned vs. Bellows, Putney vs. Bentley, Bradley vs. Bigelow vs Huntley, Bigelow, et. al. Lord vs. Bingham, Allard vs. Blake, Pike vs. Bliss vs. Arnold, et. al. Bloomfield, Schoff vs. Boyden vs. Brookline, Bradley vs. Bentley, Brings vs. Guilford, Bromley vs. Hutchins, Brooks, Hall et. al. vs. Rrookline, Boyden vs.

373

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
« PreviousContinue »