Eucharistic Sacrifice and Patristic Tradition in the Theology of Martin Bucer: 1534 - 1546

Front Cover
BRILL, 2005 - Religion - 315 pages
Luther described the Mass as the "greatest and most horrible abomination" of the papal church. On this, he argued, nothing could be surrendered. However, during the 1530s and early 1540s, the Strasbourg reformer Martin Bucer (1491-1551) sought rapprochement with the Catholics on precisely this matter. This book looks at Bucer's overtures to Catholic moderates in the era of the religious colloquies. He proposed to circumvent the Reformation impasse by returning to the Eucharistic theology of the church fathers and early scholastics. These efforts culminated in the Eucharistic articles of the "Worms-Regensburg Book" (1541). Bucer's falling out with the same Catholics in aftermath of the Colloquy of Regensburg reveals the extent to which the agreed articles were based on misunderstanding - as well as the considerable common ground that continued to exist between them. In its examination of this most fraught of Reformation debates, the book also sheds light on Bucer's ecumenical theology and his aspirations for a reunion of the German and European churches.
 

Contents

Introduction
3
The Place of Tradition in the Debate on the Sacrifice of
17
The Early Debate on the Sacrifice of the Mass
33
The Reformers Use of Patristic Testimony in the Debate
73
Bucers Early Writing on the Mass 15231531
93
Bucers Preparations for a Council 15341540
127
Catholic Irenic Writing on the Sacrifice of the Mass
145
The Colloquies and the Mass 15391541
167
The Aftermath of the First Colloquy of Regensburg
209
Eucharistic Sacrifice in Constans Defensio 1543 and De Vera
225
Conclusion
279
Bibliography
289
Index
301
Copyright

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2005)

Nicholas Thompson, Ph.D. (2000) in Ecclesiastical History, University of Glasgow, is Lecturer in Church History at the University of Aberdeen.

Bibliographic information