« PreviousContinue »
Page Oliver, Miller V. (Cal.). .
357 | Public Service Commission of Washington, Orange County Nursery & Land Co., Eu- State v._(Wash.).
":1143 calyptus Growers Ass'n V., two
Purdy v. Johnson (Cal.).
45 Oregon City Transp. Co., Rosenwald v.
Qualls, School Dist. No. 75 of Pierce Coun(Or.)
761 Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co. v. Spo- Queen Ins. Co., Clark v. (N. M.)......... 371 kane, P. & S. R. Co. (Or.). .
600 Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co. v. Spokane P. & S. R. Co. (Or.).
712 Ramsey, Turner v. (Okl.). . 989
Rayado Colonization Co. v. Rieke (Colo.).. 292 Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co., Strang
Reclamation Dist. No. 1500, Gray v. (Cal.)1024 v. (Or.)..
Reclamation Dist. No. 1500, Proper v. Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co., Wike v. (Or.)...
477 O'Rourke, State v. (Mont.).
.1159 Orr, Webster v. (Cal.).
Rees, Dobbs v. (Utah). 361
253 Ott, Smith v. (Kan.).
Reynolds v. Jones (Mont.).
Rhinehart, Phenix Ins. Co. v. (Colo.). .1137 Ottinger, Paff v. (Cal. App.).
559 Owen v. State (Okì. Cr. App.).
Ricardo v. Central Coal & Coke Co. (Kan.) 641
924 Pacific Carbon Mfg. Co., Passmore y. Ridenour-Baker Grocery Co., Robertson v. (Cal. App.)... 221 (Kan.)
655 Pacific Coast Casualty Co., Koukola v. Rieke, Rayado Colonization Co. v. (Colo.) 292 (Wash.) 388 | Rippe, People v. (Cal. App.).
506 Pacific Coast Casualty Co., Patterson V.,
Rippie, Fuller v. (Okl.)..
127 two cases (Wash.).. 388 Ritchie & Sons v. Wichita (Kan.)
176 Pacific Coast Casualty Co., Salo v. (Wash.) 384 Riverside Land Co. v. Jarvis (Cal.) Pacific Power Co., Gardner v. (Nev.). 731 Roberts v. Bertram (Utah).
787 Patf v. Ottinger (Cal. App.). 230 Roberts, State v. (Wash.).
778 Parent, Kohn v. (Cal.)...
.1008 Robertson v. Ridenour-Baker Grocery Co. Parker, Ivy v. (Ariz.).
655 Parks v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. (Kan.)1066 Robinson v. Phegley (Or.).
.1166 Parnoski(y) v. Lumkin (Okl.). 527 Robinson v. Steele (Wash.).
486 Passmore v. Pacific Carbon Mfg. Co. (Cai. Rochester, Cass v. (Cal.):
212 App.) 221 Rogers, Ditmers v. (Kan.)..
795 Patterson v. Pacific Coast Casualty Co., Rogers, State v. (Idaho).
912 two cases (Wash.). 388 Roles, Ex parte (Okl, Cr. App.).
279 Paulson, Johnson v. (Or.).
435 Roman Catholic Archbishop for Diocese of Pee v. Witt (Kan.).
797 Oregon, A. Christie, Scott Co. v. (Or.).. 88 Peerless Radiator Co., Denver Auto Goods Rosenwald v. Oregon City Transp. Co. Co. v. (Colo.)... 855 (Or.)
831 People v. Benjamin (Cal. App.).
235 Rostad v. Thorsen (Or.). People v. Coates (Cal. App.). 502 Rostad v. Thorsea (Or.).
987 People, Damas v. (Colo.). . 289 Rote, McLaughlin v. (Colo.).
S41 People, Gallimore v. (Colo.). 720 Rothe, Hoyt v. (Wash.).
925 People v. Henson (Cal. App.). 685 Rubey v. Irick (Okl.).
514 People v. Herrera (Cal. App.). 879 Rudebeck, Ex parte (Wash.).
930 People v. Kirk (Cal. App.). 696 Rudell v. Collins (Cal.).
204 People v. McDonnell (Cal. App.). ..1046 Rugger v. Hammond (Wash.).
408 People v. Magri (Cal. App.).
503 People v. Perry (Cal. App.).
683 St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co., Ergenbright People, Perry v. (Colo.). 844 V. (Kan.)
173 People v. Rippe (Cal. App.).
506 St. Louis & S. F. R. Co., Buel, Pryor & People v. Scarpa (Cal.). 883 Daniel v. (Okl.).
536 People v. Scarpa (Cal. App.).
882 St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. McFall (Okl.) 269 People v. Tugwell (Cal. App.). 508 Sakariason v. James (N. M.)..
1080 People v. Valencia (Cal. App.).
865 Salo v. Pacific Coast Casualty Co. (Wash.) 384 People v. Weston (Cal. App.)..
691 Sandberg, Bay City v. (Or.). People's Ditch Co., Fresno Canal & Irriga- Sargent v. Waterbury (Or.).
416 tion Co. v. (Cal.).. 497 Saul, Ex parte (Cal. App.).
505 Pepin v. Meyer (Mont.) 104 Savidge, State_v. (Wash.).
738 Pepin v. Meyer (Mont.). 107 Sawyer v. McRoskey (Cal. App.).
336 Pepin's Estate, In re (Mont.). 104 Sawyer, Weatherly v. (Okl.)..
717 Pepin's Estate, In re (Mont.). 107 Saylors v. State Bank of Allen (Kan.).
454 Peresteredes, Andreopulos v. (Wash.). 770 Scarpa, People v. (Cal.). .
SR3 Perry, People v. (Cal. App.).. 683 Scarpa, People v. (Cal. App.).
882 Perry v. People (Colo.).
814 Scheetz, Watson, Durand, Kasper Grocery Petit v. Sinclier (Mont.).
467 Co. v. (Kan.). Peyton v. State (Okl. Cr. App.). 719 Scheffer v. Chicago, M. & P. S. R. Co. Phegley, Robinson v. (Or.)... .1166 (Mont.)
565 Phenix Ins. Co. v. Rhinehart (Colo.). ..1137 Schmid v. Portland (Or.).
1159 Phipps, Freeman v. (Cal.)..
..1015 School Dist. No. 75 of Pierce County V. Pillsbury, Alaska Pac. S. S. Co. v., two Qualls (Wash.)..
761 cases (Cal.)...
204 Schouweiler, Metropolitan Inv. & Imp. Co. Pillsbury, Steamship Bowdoin Co. v. (Cal.) 204 v. (Or.)
599 Pioneer Const. Co., Fisher v. (Colo.). 851 Schuette, Farmers' State Bank v. (Kan.). .1073 Platnauer v. Superior Court in and for Scott, First Nat. Bank v. (N. M.). ..1084
Sacramento County (Cal. App.). ... 237 Scott, Independent Order of Odd Fellows of Pond's Estate v. Faust (Wasb.).
753 Casper, Wyo., Lodge No. 22, v. (Wyo.).. 306 Poor, Boyle y. (Colo.). 967 Scott v. State (Okl. Cr. App.).
553 Portland, E. & E. R. Co., Corvallis & A. Scott Co. v. Roman Catholic Archbishop for R. R. Co. v. (Or.).
..1173 Diocese of Oregon, A. Christie (Or.) Posten, Dunning v. (Kan.).
640 Seattle & Puget Sound Packing Co., Wm.
Page Seavey, Davis v. (Wash.).....
35 State v. Independent Gas Co. (Kan.). 148 Seely v. Stoltz's, Inc. (Cal. App.). 681 State v. Johnson (Kan.).
462 Seitzick, Hess v. (Wash.). 941 State v. Keating (Mont.).
.1156 Semon, Smith_v. (Cal. App.). .1038 State v, Kelch (Wash.).
757 Sengstacken, Foulkes v. (Or.). 311 | State v. Knapp (Kan.)
181 Severns v. Broe (Okl.). 526 State v. Lake (Kan.).
618 Severns v. English (Okl.).
526 State, Ledgerwood v. (Okl. Cr. App.). 135 Seymour, State v. (Utah). 789 State, Leseney v. (Okl. Cr. App.).
956 Shattuck, State v. (Wash.). 414 State v. Lonewolf (Okl.).
532 Sheahan v. United States Fidelity & Guar- State v. Massey (Wash.) anty Co. (Kan.) 172 State, Miller v. (Okl. Cr. App.)
131 Sherriff v. Sherriff (Cai. App.). 878 State v. Morris (Or.)..
567 Shultz 7. Crewdson (Wash.). 734 State, Mo Yaen v. (Ariz.).
135 Silent, Leutheuşer v. (Cal. App.), 225 State, Mullikin v. (Okl. Cr. App.)
.1113 Silver, National Life Ins. Co. v. (Okl.). 271 | State, Myers v. (Okl. Cr. App.).
958 Silver Creek & Panoche Land & Water State, Nash v. (Okl. Cr. App.).
330 Co., Lillis v. (Cal. App.). .1040 State v. O'Rourke (Mont.).
1159 Sim, Davis v. (Kan.). 622 State, Owen v. (Okl. Cr. App.).
548 Sinclier, Petit v. (Mont.). 467 State, Peyton v. (Okl. Cr. App.)..
719 Skelton, Smith v. (Okl.).
268 State v. Public Service Commission of Smith v. Bratman (Cal.). 892 Washington (Wash.)..
1143 Smith, Columbia River Co. p. (Or.). 309 State v. Reed (Mont.).
477 Smith' v. Consolidated Wagon & Machire State v. Roberts (Wash.).
778 Co. (Idaho). 609 State v. Rogers (Idaho).
912 Smith v. Hirst (Cal. App.). 334 State v. Savidge (Wash.).
738 Smith v. Jones (Cal.). 890 State, Scott v. (Okl. Cr. App.).
553 Smith v. Ott (Kan.). 918 State v. Seymour (Utah).
789 Smith v. Semon (Cal. App.). .1038 State v. Sbattuck (Wash.).
414 Smith v. Skelton (Okl.). . 268 State v. Smith (Mont.).
784 Smith v. Solvay Process Co. (Kan.). 615 State v. Smith (Wash.)
759 Smith, Speer v. (Or.).... 979 State, Sullins y. (Okl. Cr. App.).
721 Smith, State v. Mont.).
784 State v. Superior Court for King County Smith, State v. (Wash.). 759 (Wash.)
765 Smith v. Willis (Or.).
810 State v. Superior Court for Pacific County Smith Meat Co., Clifford v. (Or.). 808 (Wash.)
15 Snapp, McCaffrey v. (Wash.).
406 State, Teague v. (Okl. Cr. App.). 954 Solvay Process Co., Smith v. (Kan.). 645 State v. Thornhill (Kan.)
145 Sorenson v. Northern Pac. R. Co. (Mont.) 560 State, Tolliver v. (Okl.Cr. App.).
130 Southern Pac. Co., Summerfield v. (Or.)... 420 State, Towery v. (Okl. Cr. App.). 331 Sowell y. London Assur. Corp. (Cal. App.) 242 State v. United States Trust Co. of New Sowell, McAndrew v. (Kan.). 653 York (Kan.)
156 Spear v. Bremerton (Wash.). 741 State, Williams v. (Okl. Cr. App.).
279 Speer v. Smith (Or.).. 979 State v. Williams (Utah).
1104 Spencer . Gross Kelly & Co. (N. M.).....1087 State v. Willis (Wash.).
737 Sperry Flour Co., McKay v. (Wash.) 377 State v. Wilmot (Wash.).
742 Spitzer v. Oakland (Cal. App.). . 1044 State Bank of Allen, Saylors v. (Kan.)... 454 Spokane, P. & S. R. Co., Oregon-Washing- State Board of Embalmers, Eddy v. (Nev.) 245 ton R. & Nav. Co. v. (Or.)...
600 State Board of Land Com’rs, Walpole v. Spokane, P. & S. R. Co., Oregon-Washing- (Colo.)
848 ton R. & Nav. Co. v. (Or.).
989 Steamship Bowdoin Co. v. Pillsbury (Cal.) 204 Spring, Dodds v. (Cal... 351 Steele, Robinson v. (Wash.).
486 Stadelman v. Miner (Or.). 585 Steinbruck v. Milford Tp. (Kan.).
647 Stadelman v. Miner (Or.).
983 Steinman v. John Hall Tailoring Co. (Kan.) 452 Stark v. Meriwether (Kan.). 152 Stetson, Whitney v. (Wash.)...
762 State v. Adams (Wash.)..
403 State v. Atcoison, T. & S. F. R. Co. (Kan.) 157 Stevenson, Ah Poo v. (Or.)..
Stevens v. Henningsen Produce Co. (Mont.) 470
822 State, Babb v. (Ariz.)..
Stewart Poultry Co. v. Erie R. Co. (Kan.) 448 State v. Board of Com'rs of Roosevelt Coun- Stewart's Estate, In re (Cal.).
902 ty (N. M.)....
.1082 Stimson Mill Co., Goodwin v. (Wash.)... 2 State, Cain v. (Okl. Cr. App.). 958 Stoddart's Estate, In re (Cal.). .
.1010 State v. Campbell (Wash.). 279 Stoltz's, Inc., Seely v. (Cal. App.).
681 State, Cannon v. (Okl. Cr. App.). . 1112 Strahm v. Fraser (Cal. App.).
680 State y. Clausen (Wash.)..
744 Strang v. Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co. State v. Collins (Mont.) 102 (Or.)
. 1181 State v. Cutts (Mont.). 470 Stuckey v. Irwin (Kan.).
621 State v. Dallas (N. M.). 252 Sucker Creek, In re (Or.).
430 State, Darrah v. (Okl, Cr. App.). 720 Sullins v. State (Okl. Cr. App.).
721 State, Davis v. (Idaho).
373 Summerfield v. Southern Pac, Co. (Or.)... 420 State v. District Court of Fifth Judicial Sunset Lumber Co. v. Dunlap (Cal. App.).. 338
Dist. in and for Madison County (Mont.)1149 Superior Court for King County, State v. State y. District Court of First Judicial (Wash.)
765 Dist, in and for Lewis and Clark County Superior Court for Pacific County, State (Mont.) 115 v. (Wash.).
15 State v. District Court of Twelfth Judicial Superior Court in and for Sacramento
Dist. in and for Blaine County (Mont.)1149 County, Platnauer v. (Cal. App.). 237 State, Doble v. (Wash.)..
37 Superior Court of Alameda County, Bond State, Flowers v. (Okl. Cr. App.). 558 v. (Cal.);
496 State v. Gordon (Wash.). .
772 Superior Court of California in and for State, Groves y. (Okl. Cr. App.).
.1112 Los Angeles County, McClay v. (Cal. State, Haymaker v. (N. M.). 248 App.)
68 State, Holmes v. (Okl. Cr. App.). .1112 Superior Court of Kings County, BettenState v. Howland (Kan.).
court v. (Cal. App.).
682 State, Huber v. (Okl. Cr. App.).
329 Superior Portland Cement Co., McGarry State, Huffine v. (Okl. Cr. App.). 557 v. (Wash.).....
Page Supply Laundry Co., Hellan v. (Wash.).. 9 Watson, German American State Bank v. Sweeten v. Ezell (Idaho)..... 612 (Kan.)
637 Watts v. Louthan (Colo.)
76 Tarr Mining Co., E. Clemens Horst Co. v. Weatherly V. Sawyer (Okl.).
717 (Cal.) 492 Webster v. Orr (Cal.).
361 Teague v. State (Okl. Cr. App.). 954 Weitbrec v. Morris (Colo.).
.1119 Thos. S. Hayden Realty Co. v. Aurora Welch v. Ellis (Okl.),
321 (Colo.) 843 Welisch, In re (Ariz.).
26+ Thomas S. Hayden Realty Co., Galligan Welling v. Welling (Kan.).
635 v. (Colo.).. 295 Wells, In re (Cal.)...
657 Thompson v. Hance (Cal.).
..1021/ Western Indemnity Co. v. Industrial AcciThompson v. Harris (Idaho).
dent Commission of California (Cal.).... 60 Thompson, Miller v. (Okl.).
528 Western Union Tel, Co. v. Hurlburt (Or.). .1170 Thornhill, State v. (Kan.). 145 Weston, People v. (Cal. App.).
691 Thorsen, Rostad v. (Or.).
423 Wheelwright Const. Co., Farr v. (Utah).. 256 Thorsen, Rostad v. (Or.). 987 | White v. Ainsworth (Colo.).
9.59 Tibbetts v. Newman (Colo.). 720 Whitehead v. Mackey (Okl.)
124 Tidewater Southern R. Co. v. Frame (Cal. Whitehill v. Howard (Okl.).
947 App.) 720 Whitney v. Stetson (Wash.).
702 Title Guaranty & Surety Co., Morrill v. Whittlesey v. Seattle (Wash.).
193 (Wash.) 733 Whyman v. Johnston (Colo.)
76 Todd v. Cormier (Or.)..
974 Wichita Falls & N. W. R. Co., Canadian Tolliver v. State (Okl. Cr. App.)
275 Towery v. State (Okl. Cr. App.)...
331 Wichita R. & Light Co., Matassarin v. Town of Aurora, Thos. S. Hayden Realty (Kan.)
796 Co. v. (Colo.)..
843 Wichita Union Terminal R. Co. v. Kansas Town of Milwaukie, Hagenberger v. (Or.) 595 City, M. & 0. R, Co. (Kan.)..
.1067 Township of Milford, Steinbruck v. (Kan.) 647 Wicks v. Metcalf (Or.)....
434 Tugwell, People v. (Cal. App.). 508 Wicks v. Metcalf (Or.)...
9SS Turner v. Ramsey (Okl.)... 712 Wideman v. Faivre (Kan.).
619 Twentieth Ave. Northeast, In re (Wash.) 12 Wike v. Oregon-Washington R. & Nav.
825 T'Ibrand v. Bennett (Or.)....
17 Uncle Sam Oil Co. of Kansas, Gamble v.
& Puget Sound Packing Co. (Wash.) (Kan.) 627
Williams v. Brooks (Wash.). United States Fidelity Guaranty Co. v.
Williams, Citizens' Nat. Bank of Eureka Citizens' Bldg. & Imp. Co. (Colo.). 281
647 United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v.
Williams v. Goose Lake Valley Irr. Co.
(Or.) Industrial Accident Commission of Cali
81 fornia, two cases (Cal.). ..1013 Williams, Lauer v. (Cal. App.).
687 United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.,
Williams v. State (Okl. Cr. App.).
279 Sheahan v. (Kan.)... 172 Williams, State v :(Utah).
.1104 United States Trust Co. of New York, Williamson v. Monroe (Cal.).
662 State v. (Kan.). 156 Willis, Smith v. (Or.).
810 Willis, State v. (Wash.).
737 Wilmot, State v. (Wash.).
712 Valencia, People v. (Cal. App.). 865 Wilson, Belier v. (Colo.).
S01 Valley Falls Mercantile Co., Hauck v.
Wilson, Denver & R. G. R. Co. v. (Colo.) 8:57 (Kan.)
86 Van Orsdol v. Hutchcroft (Or.).
317 l'arcoe V. Alameda Lodge, No. 1015, B.
Wilson Estate Co. v. Dammeier Inv. Co. P. 0. E. of United States (Cal.).
590 Vaughn, Eisenhower v. (Wash.)...
244 Vergowe, City of Puyallup v. (Wash.).... 779
Wisner, Ex parte (Cal. App.).
868 Witt, Pee v. (Kan.).
797 Wagner v. Cardinet Fountain Brush Co. Witt's Estate, In re (Kan.).
797 (Cal. App.).. 337 | Wolf v. Gall (Cal.). .
350 Waller, Northern California Power Co. v. Wolf v. Gall (Cal. App.).
346 (Cal.) 214 Wollenberg, Caro v. (Or.).
94 Walpole v. State Board of Land Com'rs Wood, In re (Ariz.)..
848 Woodard v. Glenwood Lumber Co. (Cal.)1017 Walton Lumber Co. Commonwealth Wuchter v. Fitzgerald (Or.).
819 Lumber Co. (Wash.).
762 Wyrick v. Kansas Electric Utilities Co. Walton Trust Co., Isbell v. (Okl.)... 716 (Kan.)
.1059 Warman Steel Casting Co., Hughes v. (Cal.)
885 Yakima Highlands Irrigation & Land Co., Warren, Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Longmire v. (Wash.).
782 (Okl.) 705 Yaksum, Felix v. (Wash.).
481 Wasco County, Wilson v. (Or.).
317 Yellowstone Valley Land & Irrigation Co., Waterbury, Sargent v. (Or.). 416 Fusselman v. (Mont.).
473 Watrous, Noble v. (Or.).
310 Watson, Durand, Kasper Grocery Co. v. Zimmerman, Interstate Town-Site Co. v. Scheetz (Kan.) 168 (Kan.)
(95 Wash, 72)
“(3) That in the performance of said contract CARSTENS PACKING CO. V. MITCHELL by W. H. Mitchell one J. S. McDermott ran a et al. (No. 13759.)
boarding camp at which the men employed by
said W. H. Mitchell were boarded by the said (Supreme Court of Washington. Feb. 17, 1917.) | J. S. McDermott. 1. MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS 348 Con
“(4) That the said J. S. McDermott, while TRACTOR'S BOND
running the said boarding camp at which the ACTIONS FINDINGS OF FACT-DATE OF NOTICE.
employés of the said W. H. Mitchell boarded, Findings of fact in a suit against a munici- purchased of the plaintiff herein and used in pal contractor and the surety on his bond
which said boarding camp between the 3d day of June, do not show the date on which the notice of of the value of $694.34, of which only the sum
1914, and the 5th day of August, 1914, meat claim was filed with the city or that it was work as required by Rem. & Bal. Code, s 1161, a market run by the plaintiff in the city of filed within 30 days after the completion of the of $300 has been paid.
"(5) That the said meat was purchased from do not entitle plaintiff to judgment.
Chehalis which was commonly known as the (Ed. Note.-For other cases, see Municipal Bon Ton Market, of which market the plaintiff Corporations, Cent. Dig. 8 878.)
was the exclusive owner and one C. B. Quick 2. MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS O348 CON- was the manager for plaintiff, being employed on
TRACTOR'S BOND - ACTIONS FINDINGS OF a salary and having no ownership in or any inFACT-SUBCONTRACTOR.
terest in the profits of said market; that on the There can be no recovery on the bond of a 14th day of October, 1914, the plaintiff not havcity contractor under Rem. & Bal. Code, 88 1159, ing been paid for the merchandise so furnished, 1161, by one who furnished meat to the board- | there was filed with the city clerk of the city ing camp at which the contractor's employés of Chehalis a claim in the words and figures folboarded, where the findings of the trial court lowing: which constitute the only proof in the record do
“ 'October 14, 1914. not show that the proprietor of the boarding " "To the City of Chehalis, a Municipal Corpocamp was a subcontractor of the municipal con- ration: tractor.
"Notice is hereby given that the undersigned (Ed. Note. For other cases, see Municipal Bon Ton Market, by C. B. Quick, proprietor, Corporations, Cent. Dig. § 878.]
has a claim in the sum of four hundred twenty
four and 79-100 ($424.79) dollars against a Department 2. Appeal from Superior bond taken from W. H. Mitchell as principal Court, Lewis County; A, E, Rice, Judge.
and the Maryland Casualty Company as surety Action by the Carstens Packing Company upon the said bond
for the work of building and.
constructing the Chehalis waterworks system against W. H. Mitchell and another. Judg- from a point in the Newaukum river to Chehalis ment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. according to plans and specifications of said waAffirmed.
terworks project on file in the clerk's office of
the city of Chehalis, known as the Chehalis gravThacker & Hancock, of Chehalis, for appel- | ity water system. Bon Ton Market, lant. Weter & Roberts, of Seattle, for re
By C. B. Quick.' spondents.
“Done in open court this 221 day of March, 1916.
A. E. Rice, Judge." HOLCOMB, J. In this appeal appellant From the foregoing findings the court conbrings up no statement of facts, but brings cluded that appellant was entitled to no up only the findings, conclusions of law, and judgment against the defendants or either of judgment, and the case must be determined them, and that the defendants were entitled upon the findings. The findings are as fol- to judgment disallowing any claim of the lows:
plaintiff and for their costs. “(1) That during the year 1913 the city of
There are two assignments of error: (1) Chehalis entered into a contract with the de- That the findings do not support the judgfendant W. H. Mitchell for the construction of ment; (2) that the proofs do not warrant the a gravity water system from a point on the Ne- decree. We cannot consider the second aswaukum river to the city of Chehalis.
“(2) That thereafter the defendant W. H. signment because the proofs are not brought Mitchell executed and filed a bond in accordance here. with the provisions of the law of the state of Appellant asserts it was the theory of the Washington, in which the defendant Maryland respondents and of the trial judge that the conditioner as provided in the statutes of the notice set forth in the foregoing findings was state of Washington.
defective, in that the claimant, "Bon Ton For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes 163 P.-1
Market, by C. B. Quick, Proprietor," was
(95 Wash. 41) not the real person who was the owner of GOODWIN v. STIMSON MILL CO. (No. the Bon Ton Market; it having been alleged
13506.) and shown that the real owner of the Bon (Supreme Court of Washington. Feb. 17, 1917.) Ton Market was the appellant, and that
1. EVIDENCE Om 243(2)→ADMISSIBILITY-DECQuick was only an agent or manager thereof.
LARATIONS OF AGENTS.  Regardless of the form of the notice as Declarations of an agent made after the a sufficient compliance with section 1161, transaction cannot bind the principal, unless Rem. & Bal. Code, there is another reason they were so related to it as to constitute a part
of the res gestæ. why appellant is not entitled to recover, and
[Ed. Note.-For other cases, see Evidence, that is that the findings do not determine Cent. Dig. 8 910.) that any claim or notice was filed within 30 2. EVIDENCE Om243(2)-ADMISSIBILITY-DECdays after the completion of the work; nor LARATIONS OF AGENT. does it appear that any provisions were fur
A letter written by an agent of defendnished to a contractor or a subcontractor. It dence of the ownership by such mill company
ant mill company, held not admissible as eviwas alleged and it is found that the city of of railway on which plaintiff was injured. Chehalis entered into a contract with defend- [Ed. Note.-For other cases, see Evidence, ant Mitchell for certain construction work Cent. Dig. § 910.) for the city; that defendant Mitchell ex- Department 2. Appeal from Superior ecuted and filed a bond in accordance with Court, Snohomish County; Guy C. Alston, the provisions of the law of this state, in Judge. which the defendant casualty company was Action by E. H. Goodwin against the Stimsurety, the bond being conditioned as provid- son Mill Company. Judgment for plaintiff, ed in the statutes of the state; that in the and defendant appeals. Reversed and disperformance of the contract by Mitchell one missed. McDermott ran a boarding camp at which
Coleman & Fogarty and Q. A. Kaune, all the men employed by Mitchell were boarded of Everett, for appellant. Joseph H. Smith, by McDermott; that while running the camp of Everett, for respondent. at which the employés of Mitchell boarded McDermott purchased of appellant and used
.PARKER, J. The plaintiff, Goodwin, seeks in the boarding camp between certain dates
recovery of damages from defendant mill meat of the value of $694.34, of which only company, which he alleges resulted to him the sum of $300 was paid; that the meat was from the negligence of the company's servpurchased from the market run by appellant; ants in the operation of an engine and train and so on. The original notice was dated
upon a railway in Snohomish county. VerOctober 14, 1914, but the statute (section dict and judgment being rendered in favor 1161, supra), provides that such claim or no- of the plaintiff awarding him $50 damages, tice should be filed within 30 days from and the defendant has appealed. after the completion of the contract with,
The accident occurred while respondent and acceptance of the work by, the city com
was attempting to drive his automobile mission, and there is no sinding here that across a railway track at a road crossing in the notice or claim was so filed within 30 Snohomish county, when the engine struck days from and after the completion of the the front end of his automobile, causing the contract with, and acceptance of the work damages for which he sues to recover. Re by, the city, by the person or firm claiming spondent alleges in his complaint that he reto have supplied the provisions.
ceived personal injuries, and also that his The case resting here on the findings so automobile was damaged. There was no far as the proofs are concerned, it clearly proof upon the trial, showing him to have appears that the appellant did not affirma- been personally injured. The proof showed tively comply with the statute upon which that his automobile was repaired at an exits claim rested. The findings are therefore pense of $20, and that he lost a few days' sufficient to support the judgment that the time from his occupation of a canvasser appellant was entitled to no recovery.
while his automobile was being repaired.  There is a further total failure of These apparently constitute the items of proof, so far as the findings show, as to damage which the jury thought he was entiwhether or not McDermott was a subcontrac-tled to compensation for. While appellant tor of contractor Mitchell, and this also, un- denied negligence on the part of those in der the statute above referred to and of sec- charge of the train, and alleged that retion 1159, Rem. & Bal. Code, was a failure spondent was guilty of contributory neglisufficient to prevent a recovery.
gence resulting in his damage, appellant also Upon the state of the record the judgment denied that it was the owner or operator of must be affirmed.
the railway. There was no evidence introIt is so ordered.
duced upon the trial in respondent's behalf
showing that appellant owned or operated ELLIS, C. J., and MOUNT, PARKER, and the railway, save the following letter, which HULLERTON, JJ., concur.
was evidently written with relation to the