The Central Law Journal, Volume 73Soule, Thomas & Wentworth, 1911 - Law Vols. 65-96 include "Central law journal's international law list." |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 98
Page 3
... mean that the law grants the divorce be- cause , and only because , it is a fair presump- tion that the drunkenness will continue in the future , it is a very foolish law . Why should any woman have to live with an habitual drunk- ard ...
... mean that the law grants the divorce be- cause , and only because , it is a fair presump- tion that the drunkenness will continue in the future , it is a very foolish law . Why should any woman have to live with an habitual drunk- ard ...
Page 11
... means of enabling the defendant to get for himself the highest market price for the property of another , or of depriving the owner of the benefit of a rise in price . It is to enable them to adjust their assessment of damages to such ...
... means of enabling the defendant to get for himself the highest market price for the property of another , or of depriving the owner of the benefit of a rise in price . It is to enable them to adjust their assessment of damages to such ...
Page 14
... means or for mar- ried women living apart from their husbands or infants . - Wiegand v . Woerner , Mo. , 134 S. W. 596 . are 4. Assignments - Rescission . - Plaintiff , hav- ing been offered a rescission of a contract of sale of his ...
... means or for mar- ried women living apart from their husbands or infants . - Wiegand v . Woerner , Mo. , 134 S. W. 596 . are 4. Assignments - Rescission . - Plaintiff , hav- ing been offered a rescission of a contract of sale of his ...
Page 22
... means of creating or promoting monopolies , but included also all " restraints " and all other matters what- soever , any way tending to the instituting or strengthening of any monopoly whatever . This statute of James I was not men ...
... means of creating or promoting monopolies , but included also all " restraints " and all other matters what- soever , any way tending to the instituting or strengthening of any monopoly whatever . This statute of James I was not men ...
Page 24
... means of which he first ex- pressed this idea in this Standard Oil obiter dicta , is printed on page 18 of Senate Docu- ment No. 34 , and is as follows : " The statute under this view evidences the intent not to restrain the right to ...
... means of which he first ex- pressed this idea in this Standard Oil obiter dicta , is printed on page 18 of Senate Docu- ment No. 34 , and is as follows : " The statute under this view evidences the intent not to restrain the right to ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action alleged amendment American American Bar Association appears authority bank bill bill of lading bond carrier cause charge Circuit Court City claim Commission common law Congress Constitution contract corporation court of equity creditor criminal damages Damek debt decision deed defendant duty enforce entitled equity estoppel evidence fact federal courts fraud held husband indorsed injury interest Interstate Commerce Interstate Commerce Commission Iowa judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury Justice land lawyers legislation liability lien limitations Lumber ment mortgage N. R. Co N. Y. Supp negligence obiter dicta officer opinion owner party payment person plaintiff pleading principal proceedings purchaser question railroad rates reason recover restraint of trade rule Sherman Act Sherman law Standard Oil statute suit Supreme Court surety tion trial trust United
Popular passages
Page 370 - Every action shall be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest; but an executor, administrator, guardian, trustee of an express trust, a party with whom or in whose name a contract has been made for the benefit of another, or a party authorized by statute may sue in his own name without joining with him the party for whose benefit the action is brought...
Page 9 - Provided, that nothing in this section shall deprive any holder of such receipt or bill of lading of any remedy or right of action which he has under existing law.
Page 413 - STIRRING Up LITIGATION, DIRECTLY OR THROUGH AGENTS. It is unprofessional for a lawyer to volunteer advice to bring a lawsuit, except in rare cases where ties of blood, relationship or trust make it his duty to do so. Stirring up strife and litigation is not only unprofessional, but it is indictable at common law.
Page 5 - That the common carrier, railroad, or transportation company issuing such receipt or bill of lading shall be entitled to recover from the common carrier, railroad, or transnortation company on whose line the loss, damage, or injury shall have been sustained the amount of such loss, damage, or injury as it may be required to pay to the owners of such property, as may be evidenced by any receipt, judgment, or transcript thereof.
Page 377 - The carrier is bound to respond in that value for negligence. The compensation for carriage is based on that value. The shipper is estopped from saying that the value is greater. The articles have no greater value, for the purposes of the contract of transportation, between the parties to that contract. The carrier must respond for negligence up to that value.
Page 203 - suits in equity shall not be sustained in either of the courts of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law.
Page 219 - The Judicial Department comes home in its effects to every man's fireside : it passes on his property, his reputation, his life, his all. Is it not, to the last degree important, that he should be rendered perfectly and completely independent, with nothing to influence or control him but God and his conscience?
Page 4 - That any common carrier, railroad, or transportation company receiving property for transportation from a point in one State to a point in another State shall issue a receipt or bill of lading therefor and shall be liable to the lawful holder thereof for any loss, damage, or injury to such property caused by it...
Page 4 - The distinction between refusing to do an act commanded, — remedied by imprisonment until the party performs the required act; and doing an act forbidden, — punished by imprisonment for a definite term; is sound in principle, and generally, if not universally, affords a test by which to determine the character of the punishment.
Page 370 - All persons having an interest in the subject of the action, and in obtaining the relief demanded, may be joined as plaintiffs, except when otherwise provided in this title.