The Central Law Journal, Volume 73Soule, Thomas & Wentworth, 1911 - Law Vols. 65-96 include "Central law journal's international law list." |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 2
... ground and state legislation is not a direct interference . Shall we now say the states can act , if Congress has not covered the ground , when its statute is not in un- reasonable restraint of trade ? This Sherman Act , which fails to ...
... ground and state legislation is not a direct interference . Shall we now say the states can act , if Congress has not covered the ground , when its statute is not in un- reasonable restraint of trade ? This Sherman Act , which fails to ...
Page 3
... ground for divorce has disappeared and two children of very tender years have been virtu- ally deprived of a home formed by both pa- rents , because of an offense that has been expiated . We do not read the Missouri statute or any other ...
... ground for divorce has disappeared and two children of very tender years have been virtu- ally deprived of a home formed by both pa- rents , because of an offense that has been expiated . We do not read the Missouri statute or any other ...
Page 14
... ground for abatement . - McNamara v . Mc- Allister , Iowa , 130 N. W. 26 . 2. Adultery - Evidence . In a prosecution for adultery evidence that the woman was pregnant at time of trial held competent as corroborating testimony . - Clark ...
... ground for abatement . - McNamara v . Mc- Allister , Iowa , 130 N. W. 26 . 2. Adultery - Evidence . In a prosecution for adultery evidence that the woman was pregnant at time of trial held competent as corroborating testimony . - Clark ...
Page 15
... ground that it was without facilities for transporting them in the manner required by law with respect to such cattle . - Chicago , B. & Q. Ry . Co. v . Frye- Bruhn Co. , C. C. A. , 184 Fed . 15 . 23. -Live Stock - An initial carrier of ...
... ground that it was without facilities for transporting them in the manner required by law with respect to such cattle . - Chicago , B. & Q. Ry . Co. v . Frye- Bruhn Co. , C. C. A. , 184 Fed . 15 . 23. -Live Stock - An initial carrier of ...
Page 19
... ground that they would incriminate the corpora- tion . In the case of Wilson v . United States , 31 Sup . Ct . 538 , the question in- volved was whether a corporate officer could refuse to produce such records be- cause they would tend ...
... ground that they would incriminate the corpora- tion . In the case of Wilson v . United States , 31 Sup . Ct . 538 , the question in- volved was whether a corporate officer could refuse to produce such records be- cause they would tend ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action alleged amendment American American Bar Association appears authority bank bill bill of lading bond carrier cause charge Circuit Court City claim Commission common law Congress Constitution contract corporation court of equity creditor criminal damages Damek debt decision deed defendant duty enforce entitled equity estoppel evidence fact federal courts fraud held husband indorsed injury interest Interstate Commerce Interstate Commerce Commission Iowa judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury Justice land lawyers legislation liability lien limitations Lumber ment mortgage N. R. Co N. Y. Supp negligence obiter dicta officer opinion owner party payment person plaintiff pleading principal proceedings purchaser question railroad rates reason recover restraint of trade rule Sherman Act Sherman law Standard Oil statute suit Supreme Court surety tion trial trust United
Popular passages
Page 370 - Every action shall be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest; but an executor, administrator, guardian, trustee of an express trust, a party with whom or in whose name a contract has been made for the benefit of another, or a party authorized by statute may sue in his own name without joining with him the party for whose benefit the action is brought...
Page 9 - Provided, that nothing in this section shall deprive any holder of such receipt or bill of lading of any remedy or right of action which he has under existing law.
Page 413 - STIRRING Up LITIGATION, DIRECTLY OR THROUGH AGENTS. It is unprofessional for a lawyer to volunteer advice to bring a lawsuit, except in rare cases where ties of blood, relationship or trust make it his duty to do so. Stirring up strife and litigation is not only unprofessional, but it is indictable at common law.
Page 5 - That the common carrier, railroad, or transportation company issuing such receipt or bill of lading shall be entitled to recover from the common carrier, railroad, or transnortation company on whose line the loss, damage, or injury shall have been sustained the amount of such loss, damage, or injury as it may be required to pay to the owners of such property, as may be evidenced by any receipt, judgment, or transcript thereof.
Page 377 - The carrier is bound to respond in that value for negligence. The compensation for carriage is based on that value. The shipper is estopped from saying that the value is greater. The articles have no greater value, for the purposes of the contract of transportation, between the parties to that contract. The carrier must respond for negligence up to that value.
Page 203 - suits in equity shall not be sustained in either of the courts of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law.
Page 219 - The Judicial Department comes home in its effects to every man's fireside : it passes on his property, his reputation, his life, his all. Is it not, to the last degree important, that he should be rendered perfectly and completely independent, with nothing to influence or control him but God and his conscience?
Page 4 - That any common carrier, railroad, or transportation company receiving property for transportation from a point in one State to a point in another State shall issue a receipt or bill of lading therefor and shall be liable to the lawful holder thereof for any loss, damage, or injury to such property caused by it...
Page 4 - The distinction between refusing to do an act commanded, — remedied by imprisonment until the party performs the required act; and doing an act forbidden, — punished by imprisonment for a definite term; is sound in principle, and generally, if not universally, affords a test by which to determine the character of the punishment.
Page 370 - All persons having an interest in the subject of the action, and in obtaining the relief demanded, may be joined as plaintiffs, except when otherwise provided in this title.