Child Welfare Extension Service. Hearing ... on S. 255 and H.R. 12995 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 73
Page
... States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce. 527 Child Welfare Extension Service FEB 24 1931 HEARING BEFORE THE. STAN STAN NFORD UNIVER NFORD , CALIFO TE DUE JOHN G. COOPER , Ohio . EDWARD E. DENISON ,
... States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce. 527 Child Welfare Extension Service FEB 24 1931 HEARING BEFORE THE. STAN STAN NFORD UNIVER NFORD , CALIFO TE DUE JOHN G. COOPER , Ohio . EDWARD E. DENISON ,
Page
... COOPER, Ohio. EDWARD E. DENISON, Illinois. SCHUYLER MERRITT, Connecticut. CARL E. MAPES, Michigan. HOMER HOCH, Kansas. ADAM M. WYANT, Pennsylvania. OLGE'R B. BURTNESS, North Dakota. JOHN E. NELSON, Maine. T. J. B. ROBINSON, Iowa. M. C. ...
... COOPER, Ohio. EDWARD E. DENISON, Illinois. SCHUYLER MERRITT, Connecticut. CARL E. MAPES, Michigan. HOMER HOCH, Kansas. ADAM M. WYANT, Pennsylvania. OLGE'R B. BURTNESS, North Dakota. JOHN E. NELSON, Maine. T. J. B. ROBINSON, Iowa. M. C. ...
Page
... COOPER , Ohio . EDWARD E. DENISON , Illinois . SCHUYLER MERRITT , Connecticut . CARL E. MAPES , Michigan . HOMER HOCH , Kansas . ADAM M. WYANT , Pennsylvania . OLGER B. BURTNESS , North Dakota . JOHN E. NELSON , Maine . T. J. B. ...
... COOPER , Ohio . EDWARD E. DENISON , Illinois . SCHUYLER MERRITT , Connecticut . CARL E. MAPES , Michigan . HOMER HOCH , Kansas . ADAM M. WYANT , Pennsylvania . OLGER B. BURTNESS , North Dakota . JOHN E. NELSON , Maine . T. J. B. ...
Page 6
... COOPER . Mr. Chairman , may I ask a question ? Inasmuch as we are going to continue this hearing over until to - morrow , I would like to know how much time the opposition wants . The CHAIRMAN . They said two hours . Mr. COOPER . And ...
... COOPER . Mr. Chairman , may I ask a question ? Inasmuch as we are going to continue this hearing over until to - morrow , I would like to know how much time the opposition wants . The CHAIRMAN . They said two hours . Mr. COOPER . And ...
Page 7
... COOPER . Mr. Chairman , I hope that the hearings will not be dragged along . This committee has had this question before it for many years . We have gone into it very thoroughly , and as far as the provisions of child welfare and ...
... COOPER . Mr. Chairman , I hope that the hearings will not be dragged along . This committee has had this question before it for many years . We have gone into it very thoroughly , and as far as the provisions of child welfare and ...
Common terms and phrases
activities administration amendment American appropriation Association babies birth board of health carried cent CHAIRMAN child health child hygiene child labor amendment Children's Bureau cities clinics committee Congress Constitution Cooper bill county health departments county health units diphtheria districts Doctor BOLT Doctor FERRELL Doctor GARDINER Doctor McCORMACK Doctor WOODWARD DUNBAR ergot Federal aid Federal Government Federal subsidies Florence Kelley funds GARBER Grace Abbott health agencies health officer HUDDLESTON infancy act infant and maternal infant death rate interest January 20 Jones bill Labor legislation malaria maternal and child maternal death maternal mortality maternity act maternity and infancy measures MERRITT midwives Miss ABBOTT Miss SHERWIN mothers and children National organization PECKHAM physicians Pike County prenatal President prevention promotion Public Health Service purpose question rural health Senate Sheppard-Towner Act supervision Territory of Hawaii tion typhoid fever United States Public Washington women
Popular passages
Page 263 - The fundamental theory of liberty upon which all governments in this Union repose excludes any general power of the State to standardize its children by forcing them to accept instruction from public teachers only. The child is not the mere creature of the State; those who nurture him and direct his destiny have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare him for additional obligations.
Page 10 - The party who invokes the power must be able to show, not only that the statute is invalid, but that he has sustained or is immediately in danger of sustaining some direct injury as the result of its enforcement, and not merely that he suffers in some indefinite way in common with people generally.
Page 187 - We have no power per se to review and annul acts of Congress on the ground that they are unconstitutional. That question may be considered only when the justification for some direct injury suffered or threatened, presenting a justiciable issue, is made to rest upon such an act.
Page 157 - Questions of power do not depend on the degree to which it may be exercised. If it may be exercised at all, it must be exercised at the will of those in whose hands it is placed.
Page 248 - But the proposition that there are legislative powers affecting the nation as a whole which belong to, although not expressed in the grant of powers, is in direct conflict with the doctrine that this is a government of enumerated powers.
Page 248 - This natural construction of the original body of the constitution is made absolutely certain by the tenth amendment. This amendment, which was seemingly adopted with prescience of just such contention as the present, disclosed the widespread fear that the national government might, under the pressure of a supposed general welfare, attempt to exercise powers which had not been granted.
Page 10 - ... burden is imposed upon the states, unequally or otherwise? Certainly there is none, unless it be the burden of taxation, and that falls upon their inhabitants, who are within the taxing power of Congress as well as that of the states where they reside.