Planning, Politics and the State: Political Foundations of Planning ThoughtFirst Published in 1990. John Maynard Keynes once made the bold prediction that the three- hour work day would prevail for his grandchildren's generation. Seventy years later, the question of working time is as pertinent as it was at the inception of the 40-hour week. Not until now, however, has there been a global comparative analysis of working time laws, policies and actual working hours. Despite a century-long optimism about reduced working hours and some progress in legal measures limiting working hours, this book demonstrates that differences in actual working hours between industrialized and developing countries remain considerable – without any clear sign of hours being reduced. This study aims to offer some suggestions about how this gap can begin to be closed. most basic questions facing planning theory and practice today. The author argues that it is not plans that determine the shape of cities, but political processes. In the 1980s state planning came under siege; planners had to justify their existence to politicians, the business world and the public. Though planning must still be accountable, neither the complete domination of the market nor traditional post-war planning ideologies are wholly acceptable in the 1990s. A new agenda and a major rethinking of planning from first principles is required - but what form should this take? Showing that political theory provides the proper foundation for understanding planning practice, the book explores in turn assenting and dissenting planning paradigms. Exploration of the former begins with Weber and moves through pluralism, corporatism and neo-liberalism. Dissenting theory is organized around the work of Marx: orthodox neo-Marxism, Gramsci's 'philosophy of praxis', the critical theory of the Frankfurt School, and the work of Habermas. The author concludes with a presentation of an integrated political perspective upon planning and the state. |
Other editions - View all
Planning, Politics, and the State: Political Foundations of Planning Thought Nicholas Low No preview available - 1991 |
Common terms and phrases
activity actors American analysis argued associated authority Britain bureaucratic capitalism capitalist capitalist society central civil society competition concept conflict corporations corporatism corporatist critical theory critique culture Dahl and Lindblom decision-making decisions democracy democratic domination economic elite existence Fordism formally rational Frankfurt School freedom function Gramsci Habermas Hayek hegemony human ideal type ideas ideology implementation individual institutions interaction interest groups Jessop knowledge labour land leaders legitimacy legitimate London Marcuse Marx and Engels Marxist Max Weber means mediation mode of production modern neo-corporatist neo-liberal normative organization participation particular perspective planning practice planning theory pluralism pluralist theory political action political struggle political theory polyarchy position post-Fordism problem professional proletariat question relations relationship role rules Schmitter social strategy structure theorists University Press urban planner urban planning values Weber York