Reports of Cases Determined in the Courts of Appeal of the State of California, Volume 31Bancroft-Whitney, 1917 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 1
... PROOF BY WITNESS . - In a prosecution for the crime of robbery , it is not error to permit a witness , who went with the defendant on the night of the commis- sion of the crime to an adjoining town , to testify that they went to a hotel ...
... PROOF BY WITNESS . - In a prosecution for the crime of robbery , it is not error to permit a witness , who went with the defendant on the night of the commis- sion of the crime to an adjoining town , to testify that they went to a hotel ...
Page 3
... proof is insufficient to show that the money alleged to have been taken was the property of the complaining witness . But the evidence that Duffy got two checks in Modesto , had them cashed , and that the money in his pocket at the time ...
... proof is insufficient to show that the money alleged to have been taken was the property of the complaining witness . But the evidence that Duffy got two checks in Modesto , had them cashed , and that the money in his pocket at the time ...
Page 4
... proof of the contents of a certain hotel register . A witness , James Farley , testified that on the night of the alleged robbery the defendant went with him in an auto to the town of Tracy . He testified that at the hotel in Tracy to ...
... proof of the contents of a certain hotel register . A witness , James Farley , testified that on the night of the alleged robbery the defendant went with him in an auto to the town of Tracy . He testified that at the hotel in Tracy to ...
Page 20
... proof , are in their essen- tial features substantially the same as those pleaded and proven in the case of Freitas v . Freitas , ante , p . 16 , [ 159 Pac . 611 ] , No. 1754 , this day decided , the present case being different only in ...
... proof , are in their essen- tial features substantially the same as those pleaded and proven in the case of Freitas v . Freitas , ante , p . 16 , [ 159 Pac . 611 ] , No. 1754 , this day decided , the present case being different only in ...
Page 24
... proof thereof , that petitioner is indebted to the state for the collection of over- charges for services rendered and expenditures made during the years 1911 , 1912 , and 1913 , claims for which had at the time been duly approved and ...
... proof thereof , that petitioner is indebted to the state for the collection of over- charges for services rendered and expenditures made during the years 1911 , 1912 , and 1913 , claims for which had at the time been duly approved and ...
Contents
78 | |
118 | |
131 | |
155 | |
173 | |
175 | |
179 | |
192 | |
196 | |
214 | |
242 | |
259 | |
262 | |
267 | |
284 | |
295 | |
308 | |
310 | |
315 | |
317 | |
318 | |
333 | |
337 | |
370 | |
374 | |
379 | |
386 | |
395 | |
407 | |
427 | |
428 | |
517 | |
530 | |
542 | |
543 | |
567 | |
571 | |
578 | |
579 | |
586 | |
587 | |
590 | |
592 | |
605 | |
614 | |
641 | |
652 | |
667 | |
689 | |
712 | |
716 | |
748 | |
752 | |
753 | |
762 | |
764 | |
809 | |
816 | |
825 | |
859 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
adverse possession agreed agreement alleged amount Appellate District.-September attorney building cause of action certificate charter Civil Procedure claim Code of Civil commission complaint concurred constitution contract contributory negligence controllers corporation court of appeal damages deed defendant defendant's district court duties elevator entitled error estoppel evidence facts fendant filed finding furnished hoisted hundred dollars insanity instruction Judge judgment jurisdiction jury Kern County land lease lien Los Angeles County McPhee ment Monadnock Building mortgage motion negligence notice opinion order denying owner paid parties payment performed person petition petitioner pipe plaintiff possession purchase question reason received record Respondent Riverside township rope Sacramento San Bernardino County statement statute sufficient Superior Court supreme court testified testimony therein thereof Third Appellate thousand dollars tiff timber hitch tion trial court verdict witness writ
Popular passages
Page 81 - If the judgment or order appealed from direct the sale or delivery of possession of real property, the execution of the same shall not be stayed, unless a written undertaking be executed on the part of the appellant, with two or more sureties, to the effect...
Page 124 - ... 1. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is not true, by one who does not believe it to be true; 2. The positive assertion, in a manner not warranted by the information of the person making it, of that which is not true, though he believes it to be true; 3.
Page 197 - ... shall be punished by imprisonment In the state prison for not less than one year and not more than five years.
Page 238 - Any county, city, town, or township may make and enforce within its limits all such local, police, sanitary, and other regulations as are not in conflict with general laws.
Page 123 - The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial. The...
Page 363 - Every clerk, agent, or servant of any person who fraudulently appropriates to his own use, or secretes with a fraudulent intent to appropriate to his own use, any property of another which has come into his control or care by virtue of his employment as such clerk, agent, or servant, is guilty of embezzlement.
Page 510 - The homestead of a married person cannot be conveyed or encumbered unless the instrument by which it is conveyed or encumbered is executed and acknowledged by both husband and wife.
Page 428 - The defendants appeal from the judgment, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial. The plaintiffs own lands through which the Santa Ana river flows.
Page 457 - Notwithstanding the provisions of this chapter, no person can recover a greater amount in damages for the breach of an obligation than he could have gained by the full performance thereof on both sides...
Page 769 - ... to the effect that in case the plaintiff recovers judgment in the action, defendant will, on demand, redeliver the attached property so released to the proper officer, to be applied to the payment of the judgment, or, in default thereof, that the defendant and sureties will, on demand, pay to the plaintiff the full value of the property released, not exceeding the amount of such judgment.