Page images
PDF
EPUB

INDEX TO NOTES.

(The General Index follows this.)

Adverse possession; to flats
Almanac; as evidence
Animals; property rights in dogs:-(I.) Gen-
erally; (II.) actions of trover, replevín,
and trespass; (III.) actions against com-
mon carriers: (IV.) actions for injuries to
dogs by railroad and street cars; (V.) right
to kill dogs: (a) police power; (b) unlaw-
fully killing dogs; (c) barking and howl-
ing dogs; (d) dangerous dogs; (e) trespass-
ing dogs; (f) sheep killing dogs; (g) dogs
chasing other animals; (h) dogs "at large;"
(i) killing a dog by mistake; (VI.) criminal
actions for injuries to dogs; (VII.) larceny
and obtaining a dog by false pretenses;
(VIII.) value; (IX.) as to license and tax
laws: (a) generally; (b) taking property
without due process of law

Associations. See SYNDICATES.
Bees; property rights in:-(I.) Generally; (II.)
trespass and trover; (III.) larceny; (IV.)
tithes

394
553

503

687

[blocks in formation]

134

Contracts; acceptance of

589

Corporations; contract by chief stockhold-

[blocks in formation]

143

Scientific books and treatises as evidence:
-(I.) Exact sciences: (a) general rule as
to admissibility; (b) tables of expectancy
of life: (1) admissibility generally; (2) in
accident cases; (3) in other cases gener-
ally; (4) conclusiveness and effect; (c) the
almanac; (II.) inexact sciences: (a) gen-
eral rule as to admissibility; (b) reasons
for the rule; (c) the contrary rule; (d)
opinious founded on books; (e) use of, on
examination; (f) use of, to sustain or dis-
credit expert; (g) use of, on cross-exami-
nation; (h) use of, in argument; (III.) law;
(IV.) miscellaneous matters
Presumptions as to sanity at time of mar-
riage
Executors and administrators; right
to rents on lease of intestate's property:-
(I.) Classification by states; (II.) English
cases: (a) form of lease; (b) apportion-
ment; (c) summary of English cases; (III.)
summary as to rents accruing during
owner's life; (IV.) summary as to rents
accruing after owner's death: (a) rights of
heir, (b) rights of administrator: (1) by
statute; (2) in a foreign state; (c) liability

553

742

of administrator: (1) generally; (2) for use
and occupation; (3) accounting and sure-
ties; (d) rights of creditors; (e) apportion-
ment

What assets pass to the administrator de
bonis non :--(L.) Generally; (II.) the rule in
the different states; (III.) summary: (a)
goods remaining in specie; (b) choses in
action; (c) avoiding sales or transfers
made by predecessor; (d) rule at common
law: (1) where assets have been converted
by predecessor; (2) where there is a devas-
tavit; (3) requiring the predecessor to ac-
count; (4) money and balance due from
predecessor; (e) where the common-law
rule has been changed by statute: (1)
where assets have been converted by
predecessor; (2) where there is a devastavit;
(3) requiring the predecessor to account;
(4) money and balance due from prede-

cessor

Fence; liability for the malicious erection of
a fence:-(I.) Introduction; (II.) malice
gives no ground of action; (III.) contrary
doctrine; (IV.) state statutes and decisions
thereunder

321

33

177

Fisheries; right of, separated from upland 393
Husband and wife; marriage of person
when insane:-(I.) Invalidity of; (II.) de-
gree of incapacity which will affect; (III.)
test of capacity to contract; (IV.) test of
capacity to know the nature of the act;
(V.) incapacity combined with fraud; (VI.)
incapacity as a ground for divorce; (VII.)
ratification and waiver of right to attack;
(VIII.) evidence of incapacity: (a) pre-
sumption and burden of proof; (b) suffi-
ciency, weight, and admissibility; (c) effect
of inquisition; (IX.) annulment: (a) ne-
cessity of decree for; (b) jurisdiction; pro-
cedure; (c) effect
Hypnotism; (I.) Nature of subject; (II.) de-

737

finition; (III.) its existence and effect gen-
erally; (IV.) its use in procuring the com-
mission of crime; (V.) its use in procur-
ing submission to criminal acts or attacks;
(VI.) its use as an inquisitorial agent;
(VII.) its curative uses; propriety of re-
straint
269

Incompetent persons. See HUSBAND

AND WIFE; HYPNOTISM.
Injunction; by municipalities against nuis-

ances in waters and watercourses:-(I.) In
general; (II.) pollution and other matters
affecting health
Insurance; voluntary exposure to unneces-
sary danger within meaning of insurance
policy:- (I.) Construction compared with
negligence; (II.) consciousness of danger;
(III.) risks incident to duty or necessity;
(IV.) unexpected results; (V.) what con-

465

875

[blocks in formation]

The rights of a servant who continues work
on the faith of his master's promise to re-
move a specific cause of danger:-(I.) In-
troductory; (II.) general rule stated; (III.)
rationale of the relation between the par-
ties after the giving of the promise; (IV.)
continuance of work after promise not
contributory negligence as matter of law:
(a) generally: (b) contributory negligence
predicated from the gravity of the risk in-
curred; (c) contributory negligence predi-
cated from the length of time the servant
has worked after the promise was given;
(d) illustrative cases; (V.) servant's action
not maintainable unless his continuance
of work was actually induced by the mas-
ter's promise to protect him from some
danger, etc.; (VI.) whose promise is bind-
ing on an employer; (VII.) rule where the
promise relates to simple appliances;
(VIII.) obligations of the servant pending
the fulfilment of the promise
Medical books; as evidence
Municipal corporations. See INJUNC

tion.

Negligence; intoxication as affecting:- (I.)

Intoxication no excuse; (II.) when it
amounts to contributory negligence: (a)
generally; (b) with relation to trespassers;
(c) with relation to persons injured at
crossings; (d) with relation to passengers;
(e) with relation to persons injured on
bighways, streets, etc.; (f) with relation
to miscellaneous matters; (III.) effect
when there is negligence on both sides;
(IV.) question for the jury; (V.) presump-
tion and burden of proof; (VI.) intoxica-
tion as evidence of negligence: (a) admis-
sibility; (b) weight and sufficiency; (VII.)
employment of persons having habits of
intoxication

New Trial. See EJECTMENT.

Partnership. See SYNDICATES.

Pier. See WHARVES.

Real actions. See EJECTMENT.
Replevin; for dogs

Riparian rights. See WATERS.
40 L. R. A.

781
553

131

Scientific books; as evidence
Specific performance; of contract known

to be unauthorized

Syndicates; relations and rights of syndicate
members:-(I.) Scope and nature of the
subject; (II.) rights and powers of mem-
bers; (III.) rights, duties, and liabilities in
transactions between themselves: (a) gen-
eral rule as to good faith required; (b)
sales by member to association; (c) pur-
chases with secret advantages; (d) dealings
between associations having common
members; (e) contribution to capital, ex-
penses, and losses; (f) interest in property
of association; (g) compensation for serv-
ices; (IV.) remedies

Tithes; of bees

Trespass; for injury to dogs

For taking bees

Trover; for dogs

For taking bees

558

216

689

507

688

507

688

323

Upland. See WATERS.
Waters. See also INJUNCTION.
Separation of riparian rights from upland:-
In general; right of fishing; right of wharf-
age; mere riparian rights; cases merely
recognizing the doctrine; adverse posses-
sion; partition; method of separation
Right of owner of upland to access to navi-
gable water:-The English rule; the rule
in Ireland; the rule in Canada; general ex-
pressions favoring the right of the shore
owner in this country; the rule in Massa-
chusetts; cases holding the opposite rule
(New York, New Jersey, Washington, and
Oregon); the rule of the Federal courts;
other decisions denying the riparian own-
er's right; the effect of statutes; access
cut off by railroad; right as against priv-
ate individual; estoppel by grant; special
reasons for refusing relief; right as against
improvement of navigation; summary 593
Wharves; right to erect:-The rule in Eng-
land; the rule in this country, cases recog-
nizing the right of the riparian owner;
rule where title extends to thread of
stream; effect of custom; statutory right;
rights as against individuals; right under
grant or license; to low-water mark; pre-
scriptive right; the Federal cases; cases
denying the right; statutory restrictions;
wharves beneficial; regulation of right:
harbor lines: right of municipal corpora-
tion to build: right of city to regulate;
right of New York city; abatement of
wharf; effect of street along shore; private
contracts; direction of wharf; rights of
state and general government; effect of
constructing in front of private property;
right in wharf which has been erected;
log pier; ejectment for pier
Right of, separated from upland

507 Wills. See MASSES.

635
323

[blocks in formation]

See HIGHWAYS, 3; | AGRICULTURAL
STATE INSTITUTIONS.
AIR. See EASEMENTS, 7-9.
ALIENS.

HOSPITALS, 2.
ACCIDENT. See INSURANCE, 29–32.
ACTION OR SUIT. See also CASE, 3.

1. The administrators may sue upon a cov-
enant to pay rent to their intestate which is
appended to a lease made by him, although
his heirs are the only persons who would suf-
fer substantial damages by failure to pay it.
Walsh v. Packard (Mass.)
321

2. The right to recover for injury to a
dog is not lost by killing him, under the hon-
est but mistaken belief that he was fatally in-
jured. Citizens' Rapid Transit Co. v. Dew
(Tenn.)
518

Parties.

3. An architect supervising the construc-
tion of a building and giving notice of an in-
tention to build may be joined with the owner
of the premises as a defendant in a suit for an
injunction against the building. Kennedy v.
Burnap (Cal.)
476

4. A corporation cannot complain that its
receiver appointed in another court is not made
a party to a suit to revoke its contract to sup-
ply water to a city and its right to occupy
streets. Palestine Water & P. Co. v. Palestine
(Tex.)
203

5. The state is not a necessary party to a
suit by a city which has the exclusive con-
trol of streets, to revoke the right of a water
company to use them.
Id.

6. An amendment to a bill for an injunc-
tion against the improper use of land dedicat
ed to the public should be allowed to join
some of the original donors as plaintiffs, when
the bill is filed by other resident citizens.
Rowzee v. Pierce (Miss.)

NOTES AND BRIEFS.

402

1. A lease of land for forty-nine years to
an alien is void under Wash. Const. art. 2,
$33, prohibiting the ownership of lands by
aliens and providing that all conveyances of
land to any alien shall be void. State, Winston,
v. Hudson Land Co. (Wash.)
430

2. Conveyances made to a corporation
when a majority of the stock was owned by
citizens will be declared void where a majority
of the stock is transported to and held by
aliens, under Wash. Const. art. 2, § 33, pro-
hibiting the ownership of land by aliens and
providing that all conveyances of lands to any
alien directly or in trust shall be void, and that
every corporation the majority of the capital
stock of which is owned by aliens shall be con-
sidered an alien for the purpose of such prohi-
bition.

NOTES AND BRIEFS,
Aliens; ownership of property by.
ALMANAC.

NOTES AND BRIEFS.

As evidence.

Id.

431

558

[blocks in formation]

2. A street-railway company is liable for
the killing of a dog by an electric car, caused
by the negligence of the motorman. Citizens'
519

Actions; common law remedy to enforce Rapid Transit Co. v. Dew (Tenn.)

statute.

ADVERSE POSSESSION.

NOTES AND BRIEFS.

To flats.

Of railroad right of way.

AFFIDAVITS. See EVIDENCE, 29.

628

394

415

3. A dog is the subject of larceny under
Iowa Code 1873, § 3902, making it a crime for
anyone to steal any "chattels" of another.
Hamby v. Samson (Iowa)
Injury by dogs.

508

4. One who harbors a dog on his premises
as owners usually do with their dogs is to be
deemed the owner under a statute respecting
the liability of owners for injuries done by
117
Shultz v. Griffith (Iowa)
Negligence of a party bitten by a dog is

AFTERBORN CHILD. See CONSTITU-dogs.
TIONAL LAW, 6; JUDICIAL SALE, 3.

5.

immaterial under Iowa Code, 1485, on the
question of the liability of the owner of the
dog, unless that negligence amounts to an un.
lawful act.
Id

6. A traveler going into a yard of a feed and
livery barn which is open to patronage by the
public and at which his team is being kept for
the night, in order to see that his buggy, which
was left in the yard, has been put in the barn
and to get some articles from it, when this is
done between 8 and half past 8 o'clock in the
evening, while employees are working at the
barn, is not a trespasser or doing an unlawful
act within the meaning of Iowa Code, § 1485,
so as to preclude his recovering from the pro- |
prietor for injuries received from a dog which
attacks and bites him.
Id.

NOTES AND BRIEFS.

Animals; property rights in dogs:- (I.) Gen-
erally; (II.) actions of trover, replevin, and
trespass; (III.) actions against common carriers;
(IV.) actions for injuries to dogs by railroad
and street cars; (V.) right to kill dogs: (a) police
power; (b) unlawfully killing dogs; (c) barking
and howling dogs; (d) dangerous dogs; (e) tres-
passing dogs: (f) sheep-killing dogs; (g) dogs
chasing other animals; (h) dogs "at large;"
(i) killing a dog by mistake: (VI.) criminal
actions for injuries to dogs; (VII.) larceny and
obtaining a dog by false pretenses; (VIII.)
value; (IX.) as to license and tax laws: (a) gen-
erally; (b) taking property without due process
of law.
503

on a trial without a jury is not an essential
part of the record on appeal, and where gen-
eral findings are made by the court and a judg
ment pronounced thereon, the appellate court
will conclusively presume that the trial court
considered all the competent evidence before it
and decided all the material and necessary
issues presented by the pleading, although the
opinion shows the contrary. Phenix Ins. Co.
v. Fuller (Neb)
408

6. When any document is offered in evi-
dence and excluded, it must be brought into
the record to have its competency determined
on appeal. Slauson v. Goodrich Transp. Co.
(Wis.)
825

7. An appellate court can take notice of
papers which are not part of the judgment roll
only when they have been preserved and prop-
erly identified in the bill of exceptions.

[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

109

10. Failure to show that a designated per-
son was regularly appointed shorthand re-
porter to take the testimony of an accused
before a committing magistrate will not sup-
port an assignment of error, if it does not
APARTMENT HOUSE. See BUILD-appear that he acted or reported the testimony
or certified to it. People v. Ebanks (Cal.) 269
INGS, 1.
Briefs.

APPEAL AND ERROR. See also CASES
CERTIFIED.

1. A separate appeal must be taken from a
death warrant signed after judgment, to bring
the question of its regularity before the ap
pellate court. People v. Ebanks (Cal.) 269

2. Trustees representing a religious society
to which a devise was made in trust to expend
the proceeds in saying masses are proper par-
ties to appeal from a decision against the de-
vise. Hoeffer v. Clogan (Ill.)
730

Bond.

3. Defendant in error in the Virginia su
preme court of appeals waives the omission
from the appeal bond, given before the clerk
as prescribed by Va. Code, § 3471, of the con-
dition for the payment of all actual damages
incurred in consequence of the proceedings, by
failing to raise the objection until it is too late
for plaintiff to give a new bond or to have an-
other appeal allowed. Virginia F. & M. Ins.
Co. v. New York Carousal Mfg. Co. (Va.) 237
Supersedeas.

11. Under rules requiring but one brief on
each side, and permitting a reply in addition,
although separate briefs may be permissible
where there are several counsel on the same
side, the allowance for printing will extend
only to what is reasonably necessary. Cook
v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. M. R. Co. (Wis.)

457

12. The provision of the Wisconsin su-
preme court rule 9, that in cases depending on
the evidence the brief of appellant must contain
a concise statement of the leading facts or con-
clusions which the evidence establishes or tends
to prove, does not mean a recital or restate-
ment of the evidence, but merely that such
facts or conclusions should be stated with a
reference to the names of the witnesses and
the places in the printed cases where the evi-
dence which establishes or tends to prove such
facts or conclusions may be found. Milwauke
Cold Storage Co. v. Dexter (Wis.)
Questions first raised on appeal.

837

13. Alleged error in failing to direct a ver-
dict for defendant accident insurance company
on the ground that plaintiff had voluntarily
exposed himself to unnecessary danger, is not
available on appeal where no request therefor
was made in the trial court. Johnson v. Lon-
don Guarantee & A. Co. (Mich.)
440

4. An order of supersedeas to preserve the
status quo of the parties pending the determi-
nation of an appeal upon its merits is within
the inherent powers of an appellate tribunal
which is authorized to issue all writs neces-
sary and proper to the complete exercise of its
appellate and revisory jurisdiction. State, 13a. Variance between pleading and proof
Barnard, v. Seattle Bd. of Edu. (Wash.) 317 is not ground for reversal when no objection
Record; evidence.
was made in the trial court. Colfax Mountain
5. A written opinion filed by the trial court | Fruit Co. v. Southern Pac. Co.

78

Errors in party's favor or at his re- a fire insurance policy is not error, where that
quest.

[blocks in formation]

15. An inconsistency in the instructions
due to the fact that some instructions are more
favorable to one of the parties than he is enti-
tled to is not available to such party. Hess v.
Preferred Masonic Mut. Acci. Asso. (Mich.)
444

fact was fully proved, with no question as to
the accuracy of the proof. Western Assur.
Co. v. J. H. Mohlman Co. (C. C. App. 2d C.)
561

27. Verbal inaccuracy of a charge to the
jury will not require a reversal, if the charge
as a whole fairly and accurately presents the
law applicable to the facts. Perham v. Port-
land General Elec. Co. (Or.)
799

NOTES AND BRIEFS.

16. The failure of the court to assess dis-
franchisement as part of the punishment of a
convict is not an error of which he can com- APPORTIONMENT.
plain. Miller v. State (Ind.)

Appeal; conclusiveness of findings of jury
as to law.
653

109

DISTRICTS.

17. One who relied upon a former adjudi-
cation of a matter cannot complain of a deci. APPRAISAL.
sion which is to the same effect. Gibson v.
Gibson (Wash.)

Review of facts.

587

See ELECTION

See MORTGAGE, 5, 6.

APPURTENANCES. See DEEDS, 2;
EASEMENTS. 9.

ARREST. See also REWARD, 2.

18. A conclusion as to an ultimate fact, ARCHITECT. See ACTION OR SUIT, 3.
drawn from certain specified evidential facts
which are legally incompetent to support it, is
a proper subject of review on proceedings in
error. Nichols v. Peck (Conn.)
81
19. Findings of fact are not conclusive on
the appellate court in equity cases, unless the
evidence is so evenly balanced or so unsatis-
factory as to leave the court in serious doubt.
North Point Consol. Irrig. Co. v. Utah & S. L.
Canal Co. (Utah)

Errors requiring reversal.

851

20. Filing the sheriff's affidavit that he was
biased, taken upon a challenge to a special
venire summoned by him, embodying facts
brought out while the jury were excluded
from the room, is not reversible error. Peo-
ple v. Ebanks (Cal.)
269

21. Irrelevant testimony will not require a
reversal, if it was harmless. Mack v. South
Bound R. Co. (S. C.)
679
22. There will be no reversal for cross-ex-
amination as to matters not testified to in chief
if the examination in chief is not in the record,
so that it does not appear whether the cross-
examination was improper or not. People v.
Ebanks (Cal.)
269

355

The arrest by a police officer of San Fran-
cisco, without a warrant, of a murderer, for a
crime committed in another county of the state,
is made in the exercise of his duty, so as to
preclude his recovery of a reward for making
it. Lees v. Colgan (Cal.)
ASSAULT AND BATTERY. See CAR-
RIERS, 4.
ASSIGNMENT.
NOTES, 2; FRAUD, 2.

See

also BILLS AND

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

23. A judgment will not be reversed for
failure to sustain a demurrer for reasons not
specified therein. Bristol v. New England R.
Co. (Conn.)
479
24. An improper statement by counsel in
opening a case, which is immediately with ASSOCIATIONS. See also
drawn after an exception, with an acknowl
edgment that it was not justified under the ex-
isting state of the record, will not be regarded
on appeal as prejudicial error, if it was not so
considered by the trial judge. Erb v. German-
American Ins. Co. (Iowa)
25. Refusal of instructions the meaning of ASSUMPSIT.
which is involved in doubt, or which are un- A public officer receiving fees to which
called for in the case, is not reversible error if he is not entitled, from a party whom he knows
the instructions given upon that branch of the to be ignorant of the law, without informing
case are as favorable to the complaining party him that he is not bound to pay, receives
as the facts and the law will warrant. People money fraudulently, and is liable to an action
v. Ebanks (Cal.)
269 for money had and received. Marcotte v. Al-

[blocks in formation]
« PreviousContinue »