International Authority and the Responsibility to Protect

Front Cover
Cambridge University Press, Jan 20, 2011 - Law
The idea that states and the international community have a responsibility to protect populations at risk has framed internationalist debates about conflict prevention, humanitarian aid, peacekeeping and territorial administration since 2001. This book situates the responsibility to protect concept in a broad historical and jurisprudential context, demonstrating that the appeal to protection as the basis for de facto authority has emerged at times of civil war or revolution - the Protestant revolutions of early modern Europe, the bourgeois and communist revolutions of the following centuries and the revolution that is decolonisation. This analysis, from Hobbes to the UN, of the resulting attempts to ground authority on the capacity to guarantee security and protection is essential reading for all those seeking to understand, engage with, limit or critique the expansive practices of international executive action authorised by the responsibility to protect concept.

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.


1 Protection in the Shadow of Empire
From the Parliament of Man to International Executive Rule
Hobbes Schmitt and the Responsibility to Protect
Jurisdiction Recognition and the Institutionalisation of Protection
5 The Question of Status and the Subject of Protection

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2011)

Anne Orford is the Michael D. Kirby Professor of International Law, an Australian Research Council Professorial Fellow and Director of the Institute for International Law and the Humanities at the University of Melbourne. She researches in the areas of international law and legal theory, with a current focus on histories of international law, political theology and empire.

Bibliographic information