Conventional Choices?: Maritime Leadership Politics, 1971–2003

Front Cover
UBC Press, Nov 1, 2011 - Political Science - 320 pages
Selecting a leader is a momentous and defining choice for a political party. Leaders symbolize their party and are a primary factor in election outcomes. While much is known about the selection of national party leaders, less is known about the provincial selection process, particularly in the Maritimes. Breaking new ground, Conventional Choices examines twenty-five different leadership elections in three maritime provinces. The analysis draws on an extraordinarily rich data set spanning thirty-two years to explore the backgrounds, attitudes, and motivations of those who select party leaders. It is an impressive study that offers fresh insights into leadership selection and Maritime party politics.
 

Contents

1 Choosing Leaders
3
2 The Conventions
15
Candidates and Voters
27
4 Tourists or Partisans? Political Background and Leadership Election Engagement
48
Friends and Neighbours?
61
UrbanRural Divisions
77
7 Brothers and Sisters? GenderBased Voting at Party Conventions
86
8 Inter and Intraparty Attitudinal Differences
98
11 Prince Edward Island and the Garden Myth
143
The Politics of Language
155
The Challenge of Social Democracy
172
14 The End of the Affair? Political Scientists and the Delegated Convention
187
15 Conclusion
198
Leadership Election Profiles for Nova Scotia New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island
205
Notes
265
Bibliography
288

9 Rebels without a Cause? Supporters of Fringe Candidates
114
10 Going My Way? Delivering Votes after the First Ballot
130

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2011)

Ian Stewart is a professor of political science at Acadia University and author of Roasting Chestnuts: The Mythology of Maritime Political Culture. David K. Stewart is a professor of political science at the University of Calgary and author of Quasi-Democracy? Parties and Leadership Selection in Alberta.

Bibliographic information