Potatoes-Truck Farmers' Assoc. v. Northeastern Ry., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 295 (1895); Rea v. Mobile & O. Ry., 7 I. C. C. Rep. 43 (1897); Freeman v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 7 I. C. C. Rep. 202 (1897); Shippers' Union of Phoenix v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 250 (1902); National Hay Assoc. v. Lake Shore & M. S. Ry., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 264 (1902). Poultry-Re Alleged Violations of Act, 8 I. C. C. Rep. 290 (1899).

Provisions-New York Produce Exch. v. Baltimore & O. R. R., 7 I. C. C. Rep. 612 (1898).

Radiators-Business Men's League v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 318 (1902).

Rice-Johnston-Larimer D. G. Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 568 (1896); Danville v. Southern Ry., 8 I. C. C. Rep. 409 (1900); Kindel v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 606 (1903). Rolled Oats-F. Schumacher Milling Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 61 (1894).

Roofing Slag-Warren-Ehret Co. v. Central R. R., 8 I. C. C. Rep. 598 (1900).

Rope-Shippers' Union of Phoenix v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 250 (1902).

Rosin-Savannah Bureau of Freight & Transp. v. Louisville & N. R. R., 8 I. C. C. Rep. 377 (1899).

Rye-National Hay Assoc. v. Lake Shore & M. S. Ry., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 264 (1902); Canon Falls F. E. Co. v. Chicago G. W. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 650 (1905).

Salt Shippers' Union of Phoenix v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 250 (1902); Re Transportation of Salt from Hutchinson, 10 I. C. C. Rep. 1 (1904); Re Transportation of Salt, 10 I. C. C. Rep. 148 (1904).

Sand-Castle v. Baltimore & O. Ry., 8 I. C. C. Rep. 333 (1899).

Sash-Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth S. S. & A. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 489

(1905).

School Slates-Chattanooga Chamber of Commerce v. Southern Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 118 (1904).

Screen Frames, Scroll Work-Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth S. S. & A. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 489 (1905).

Sealskins, Sea Shells, Sheepskins-Kindel v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 606 (1903).

Sheet Iron-Business Men's League v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 330 (1902).

Shelves-Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth S. S. & A. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 489 (1905).

Shingles-James v. Canadian Pac. Ry., 4 Int. Com. Rep. 274, 5 I. C. C. 612 (1893); Michigan Box Co. v. Flint & P. M. R. R., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 335

(1895); Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth S. S. & A. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 489 (1905).

Shutters-Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth S. S. & A. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 489 (1905).

Slates-Chattanooga Chamber of Commerce v. Southern Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 118 (1904).

Snapped Corn-H. B. Pitts & Son v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 684 (1905).

Soap-Shippers' Union of Phoenix v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 250 (1902); Proctor & Gamble Co. v. Cincinnati H. & D. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 440 (1903).

Soil Pipe-Business Men's League v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 318 (1902).

Spindles-Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth S. S. & A. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 489 (1905).

Spring-bed Material-Murphy v. Wabash R. R., 3 Int. Com. Rep. 725, 5 I. C. C. 122 (1891).

Squash-Truck Farmers' Assoc. v. Northeastern Ry., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 295 (1895).

Stair Work-Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth S. S. & A. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 489 (1905).

Steel-Colorado F. & I. Co. v. Southern Pac. Co., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 488

(1895).

Stove Fronts-Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth S. S. & A. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 489 (1905).

Straw-National Hay Assoc. v. Lake Shore & M. S. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 264 (1902).

Strawberries-Perry v. Florida C. & P. R. R., 3 Int. Com. Rep. 740, 5 I. C. C. 97 (1891); Truck Farmers' Assoc. v. Northeastern Ry., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 295 (1895).

Sugar-Lehmann v. Southern Pac. Co., 3 Int. Com. Rep. 80, 4 I. C. C. 1 (1890); Lehmann v. Texas & P. Ry., 3 Int. Com. Rep. 706, 5 I. C. C. 41 (1891); Johnston-Larimer D. G. Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 6 1. C. C. Rep. 568 (1896); Calloway v. Louisville & N. R. R., 7 I. C. C. Rep. 431 (1897); Phillips, Bailey & Co. v. Louisville & N. R. R., 8 I. C. C. Rep. 93 (1898); Savannah Bureau of Freight & Transp. v. Louisville & N. R. R., 8 I. C. C. Rep. 377 (1899); Danville v. Southern Ry., 8 I. C. C. Rep. 409 (1900); Gustin v. Burlington & M. R. R., 8 I. C. C. Rep. 481 (1900); Kindel v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 8 I. C. C. Rep. 608 (1900); Tifton v. Louisville & N. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 160 (1902); Shippers' Union of Phoenix v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 250 (1902); Wichita v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 507 (1903); LehmanHigginson Grocery Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 460 (1905); Blackman v. Southern Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 352 (1904.

Tobacco-Danville v. Southern Ry., 8 I. C. C. Rep. 409 (1900). Tomatoes-Rea v. Mobile & O. Ry., 7 I. C. C. Rep. 43 (1897). Turnips-Truck Farmers' Assoc. v. Northeastern Ry., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 295 (1895).

Turpentine-Savannah Bureau of Freight & Transp. v. Louisville & N. R. R., 8 I. C. C. Rep. 377 (1899).

Vanilla Beans-Kindel v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 606 (1903).

Vegetables-Delaware State Grange v. New York, P. & N. R. R., 3 Int. Com. Rep. 554, 4 I. C. C. 588 (1891); Re Unlawful Charges for Transportation of Vegetables, 8 I. C. C. Rep. 585 (1900); Truck Farmers' Assoc. v. Northeastern Ry., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 295 (1895).

Wagons-Shippers' Union of Phoenix v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 250 (1902).

Wainscoting-Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth S. S. & A. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 489 (1905).

Whalebone and Whale Oil Foots-Kindel v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 606 (1903).

Wheat-Evans v. Oregon Ry. & N. Co., 1 Int. Com. Rep. 641, 1 I. C. C. 325 (1887); Milwaukee Chamber of Commerce v. Flint B. & P. M. R. R., 2 Int. Com. Rep. 393, 2 I. C. C. 553 (1889); In re Alleged Excessive Freight Rates, 3 Int. Com. Rep. 93, 4 I. C. C. 48 (1890); Buchanan v. Northern Pac. R. R., 3 Int. Com. Rep. 655, 5 I. C. C. 7 (1891); F. Schumacher Milling Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 61 (1894); Newland v. Northern P. R. R., 6 I. C. C Rep. 131 (1894); Evans v. Union P. Ry., 6 I. C. C. Rep. 520 (1896); Board of Railroad Comrs. v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry., 7 I. C. C. Rep. 380 (1897); Chamber of Commerce v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry., 7 I. C. C. Rep. 481 (1898); Grain Shippers' Assoc. v. Illinois Cent. R. R., 8 I. C. C. Rep. 158 (1899); Re Export and Domestic Rates on Grain, 8 I C. C. Rep. 214 (1899); Board of R. Comrs. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 8 I. C. C. Rep. 304 (1899); National Hay Assoc. v. Lake Shore & Michigan S. Ry., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 264 (1902); Wichita v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 558 (1903); Wichita v. Missouri Pac. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 35 (1904); Aberdeen Group Commercial Assoc. v. Mobile & O. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 289 (1904); Cannon Falls Farmers' Elevator Co. v. Chicago G. W. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 650 (1905).

Window Frames and Screens-Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth S. S. & A. Ry., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 489 (1905).

Window Shades-6 I. C. C. Rep. 148 (1894), 6 I. C. C. Rep. 548 (1896). Wine, Wire Fence, Woodenware-Shippers' Union of Phoenix v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 250 (1902).

Wool-Kindel v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 606 (1903). Zinc Sheets, Zinc Slab-Business Men's League v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R., 9 I. C. C. Rep. 323 (1902).

TOPIC E-REASONABLE FACILITIES.

[The common law situation is discussed in Chapters VII, IX, XX, XXIII.]

§ 935. Not required by original act.

The original interstate commerce act did not require or give the Commission power to require that carriers should furnish reasonable facilities; though it did forbid any discrimination in furnishing facilities. The common law required the furnishing of such facilities; but since the act was silent, the Commission could not require a carrier to furnish cars. Scofield v. Lake Shore & M. S. Ry., 2 Int. Com. Rep. 67, 2 I. C. C. 90 (1888); Rice v. Cincinnati, W. & B. R. R., 3 Int. Com. Rep. 841, 5 I. C. C. 193 (1891). Nor can it require a railroad to furnish refrigerator cars for the carriage of fruit. Re Transportation & Refrigeration of Fruit, 10 I. C. C. Rep. 360 (1904). So it cannot order a railroad to deliver carload freight in bulk to a connecting road. Railroad Comrs. v. Louisville & N. R. R., 10 I. C. C. Rep. 173 (1904). Nor is a railroad under the act obliged to allow a steamboat access to its wharf. Ilwaco Ry. & Nav. Co. v. Oregon S. L. & U. N. Ry., 57 Fed. 673, 6 C. C. A. 495, 5 Int. Com. Rep. 627 (1895).

936. Switching privileges.

In the same way under the original act a railroad was not bound to provide and maintain a spur track to the premises of a shipper. Mt. Vernon Milling Co. v. Chicago, M. & S. P. Ry., 7 I. C. C. Rep. 194 (1897); Red Rock Fuel Co. v. Baltimore & O. R. R., 11 I. C. C. Rep. 438 (1905). The duty of providing switching privileges was placed upon railroads in England in 1904 (ante, § 874), and now is imposed in the United States by the provision of the act of 1906 given above.

CHAPTER XXIX.

DISCRIMINATIONS BETWEEN PERSONS.

§ 941. Provisions of the statute.

942. Amendments of 1906.

TOPIC A-UNDUE OR UNREASONABLE PREFERENCE OR ADVANTAGE.

§ 943. What discrimination is forbidden.

944. What preference is undue and unreasonable. 945. Device for concealing preference unavailing. 946. Preference in certain services permissible. 947. Effect of illegality on contract of carriage.

§ 955. What amounts to a rebate.

956. Allowance for cars or facilities furnished by the shipper.

957. Division of rate with industrial railway.

958. Sale and delivery of commodities by a railroad.

TOPIC E-EXCEPTIONS.

§ 959. Statutory exceptions not exclusive.

960. Carriage for the government.

961. Ministers of religion.

962. Officers and employees.

963. Mileage, excursion and commutation tickets.