track of the Savage Brick Company, at Keystone Junction, while furnish- CARTRIDGES. Rates on. Chamber of Commerce of Chattanooga v. Southern R. Co. 118. CASES CITED. Allen v. L. N. A. & C. R. Co. 1 I. C. C. Rep. 199,-cited on p. 34. Allowances to Elevators by Union P. R. Co., Re, 10 I C. C. Rep. 309,- A. T. & S. F. Ry. Co., Re, 7 I. C. C. 240,-cited on p. 660. Board of Trade of Chattanooga v. East Tennessee, V. & G. R. Co. 5 I. C. Board of Trade of Lynchburg v. Old Dominion S. S. Co. 6 I. C. C. Rep. Butchers' & Drovers' Stock Yards Co. v. Louisville & N. R. Co. 14 C. C. Carr v. Northern Pacific Railway Company, 9 I. C. C. Rep. 1,―cited on Cartage case, See INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION V. DETROIT, G. H. Cattle Raisers' Association of Texas v. Forth Worth & Denver City Rail- Central Stock Yards Co. v. Louisville & N. R. Co. 55 C. C. A. 63, 118 Central Stock Yards Co. v. Louisville & N. R. Co. 112 Fed. 823,-cited Central Stock Yards Co. v. Louisville & N. R. Co. 192 U. S. 568, 48 L. ed. Central Yellow Pine Association v. Illinois Central Railroad Company Central Yellow Pine Association v. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Rail- Charges for the Transportation and Refrigeration of Fruit Shipped from Chicago Board of Trade v. Chicago & Alton R. Co. et al. 4 I. C. C. Rep. Cleveland, C. C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Illinois, 177 U. S. 514, 44 L. ed. 868, Consolidated Forwarding Co. v. Southern P. Co. 9 I. C. C. Rep. 182,- Copp v. Louisville & N. R. Co. 50 Fed. 164,-cited on p. 100. Covington & Lexington Turnpike Road Co. v. Sandford, 164 U. S. 596, Covington Stock Yards Co. v. Keith, 139 U. S. 128, 35 L. ed. 73, 11 Sup. Crews v. Richmond & D. R. Co. 1 I. C. C. Rep. 401, 1 Inters. Com. Rep. Danville v. Southern Railway Co. 8 I. C. C. Rep. 409,-cited on p. 344. Diamond Mills v. B. & M. R. R. 9 I. C. C. Rep. 311,-cited on p. 681. Duncan v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. et al. 6 I. C. C. Rep. 85,—cited East Tennessee, Va. & Ga. Railway v. Interstate Commerce Commission, East Tennessee, V. & G. R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 181 Express Cases, 117 U. S. 1, 29 L. ed. 791, 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 542, 628,- Georgia Peach Growers' Association v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. Glade Coal Company Case, 10 I. C. C. Rep. 226,-cited on p. 647. Guild v. Hale, 15 Mass. 455,-cited on p. 104. Harp Case, 118 Fed. 169,-cited on p. 647. Harp v. Choctaw, O. & G. Ry. Co. 118 Fed. 169,-cited on p. 245. H. H. Tift v. Southern Railway Company et al. 123 Fed. Rep. 789,- Holmes v. Southern Ry. Co. 8 I. C. C. Rep. 568,-cited on pp. 535, 542. Independent Refiners' Asso. v. Western New York & P. R. Co. 6 I. C. C. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baird, 194 U. S. 25, 48 L. ed. 860, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. 186 U. S. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Clyde S. S. Co. et al. 181 U. S. 29, 45 L. ed. 729, 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 512,-cited on p. 109. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Detroit, G. H. & M. R. Co. 167 U. S. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Southern Pacific Co. et al. 123 Fed. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Southern Pacific Co. et al. 132 Fed. Joint Traffic Association Case, 171 U. S. 569, 571, 577, 43 L. ed. 287, 288, Kauffman Milling Company v. Missouri Pacific Railway Company, 4 I. C. Kentucky & I. Bridge Co. v. Louisville & N. R. Co. 2 Inters. Com. Rep. 351, Little Rock & M. R. Co. v. St. Louis & S. W. R. Co. 4 Inters. Com. Rep. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Behlmer, 175 U. S. 648, 44 L. ed. 309, 20 Sup. Louisville & N. R. Co., Petition of, 1 I. C. C. Rep. 31, 1 Inters. Com. Rep. Macloon v. Boston & M. R. R. Co. et al. 9 I. C. C. Rep. 642,-cited on Marten y. L. & N. R. R. Co. 9 I. C. C. Rep. 589,-cited on p. 547. Michigan Insurance Bank v. Eldred, 130 U. S. 693, 32 L. ed. 1080, 9 Sup. New Orleans Cotton Exchange v. Louisville, N. O. & T. R. Co. 4 I. C. C. New York Produce Exchange v. New York C. & H. R. R. Co. 3 I. C. C. Oregon Short Line & U. N. R. Co. v. Northern P. R. Co. 4 Inters. Com.. Paine Brothers & Company v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company et al. Pullman Palace Car Co. v. Missouri P. R. Co. 115 U. S. 587, 29 L. ed. 499, Proposed Advances in Freight Rates, Matter of, 9 I. C. C. Rep. 382,- Railroad Commission v. Louisville & N. R. Co. 10 I. C. C. Rep. 173,- Railroad Comrs. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. 8 I. C. C. Rep. 304,-cited Ratican v. Terminal R. Asso. 114 Fed. 666,-cited on p. 100. Richmond v. Irons, 121 U. S. 27, 30 L. ed. 864, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 788,- Riddle, Dean & Company v. Pittsburg & Lake Erie Railroad Company, 1 Robinson et al. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, Decided by C. C. Smyth v. Ames (Nebraska Freight Rate Case) 169 U. S. 466, 42 L. ed. Squire & Co. v. Michigan Central R. Co. et al. 4 I. C. C. Rep. 611,— Texas & P. R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 162 U. S. 197, Transportation of Salt from Hutchinson, Kansas, Re, 10 I. C. C. Rep. Truck Farmers' Case, 6 I. C. C. Rep. 295,-cited on p. 376. Union Terminal R. Co. v. Board of Railroad Commissioners of Kansas, United States v. Freight Association, 166 U. S. 341, 41 L. ed. 1027, 17 United States v. New York, 160 U. S. 598,-cited on p. 103. United States ex rel. Coffman v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company Unlawful Rates in the Transportation of Cotton, Matter of, 8 I. C. C. Wight v. United States, 167 U. S. 512, 42 L. ed. 258, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. CASES DISAPPROVED. Johnston-Larimer D. Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. 6 I. C. C. Rep. CASINGS. Freight classification of. Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth, S. S. & A. R. CATTLE. Rates on. Chicago Live Stock Exchange v. Chicago G. W. R. Co. 428. CEDAR LUMBER. Rates on. Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth, S. S. & A. R. Co. 489. CEDAR POLES. Rates on. Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth, S. S. & A. R. Co. 489. CEDAR POSTS. Rates on. Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth, S. S. & A. R. Co. 489. CEDAR SHINGLES. Rates on. Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth, S. S. & A. R. Co. 489. CEMENT. Table showing car capacity and actual loading weight of car loaded with Central Yellow Pine Asso. v. Illinois C. R. Co. 533. Table showing comparison of total annual tonnage of cement with that Central Yellow Pine Asso. v. Illinois C. R. Co. 534. CHERRY LUMBER. Freight classification of. Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth, S. S. & A. R. CHEWING GUM. Rates on. Wrigley v. Cleveland, C. C. & St. L. R. Co. 412. CLOSET FITTINGS. Rates on. Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth, S. S. & A. R. Co. 489. CLOSET SEATS. Rates on. Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth, S. S. & A. R. Co. 489. CLOSET TANKS. Rates on. COAL. Duluth Shingle Co. v. Duluth, S. S. & A. R. Co. 489. Table showing car capacity and actual loading capacity when loaded Tift v. Southern R. Co. 577. Rates on. Glade Coal Co. v. Baltimore & O. R. Co. 226. Denison Light & Power Co. v. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. 337. Re Transportation of Coal & Mine Supplies, 473. COFFEE, GREEN. Rates on. Chamber of Commerce of Chattanooga v. Southern R. Co. 117. Rates on. Chamber of Commerce of Chattanooga v. Southern R. Co. 117. COMBINATIONS. The advance of rates by defendants was the result of concerted action COMBINATION TO PREVENT CONTINUOUS CARRIAGE. A railroad company does not violate the Act to Regulate Commerce, in COMPETITION. See also WATER COMPETITION. 1. Applying the law as construed by the United States Supreme Court, |