Politics, Language, and Thought: The Somali Experience
David D. Laitin, David C. Lattin, James T Watkins IV and Elise V Watkins Professor of Political Science David D Laitin
University of Chicago Press, 1977 - Language Arts & Disciplines - 268 pages
When the Somali Republic received independence, its parliamentary government decided to adopt three official languages: English, Italian, and Arabic—all languages of foreign contact. Since the vast majority of the nation's citizens spoke a single language, Somali, which then had no written form, this decision made governing exceedingly difficult. Selecting any one language was equally problematic, however, because those who spoke the official language would automatically become the privileged class.
Twelve years after independence, a military government was able to settle the acrimonious controversy by announcing that Somali would be the official language and Latin the basic script. It was hoped that this choice would foster political equality and strengthen the national culture. Politics, Language, and Thought is an exploration of how language and politics interrelate in the Somali Republic. Using both historical and experimental evidence, David D. Laitin demonstrates that the choice of an official language may significantly affect the course of a country's political development.
Part I of Laitin's study is an attempt to explain why the parliamentary government was incapable of reaching agreement on a national script and to assess the social and political consequences of the years of nondecision. Laitin shows how the imposition of nonindigenous languages produced inequalities which eroded the country's natural social basis of democracy.
Part 2 attempts to relate language to political thought and political culture. Analyzing interviews and role-playing sessions among Somali bilingual students, Laitin demonstrates that the impact of certain political concepts is quite different when expressed in different languages. He concludes that the implications of choosing a language are far more complex than previously thought, because to change the language of a people is to change the ways they think and act politically.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
able accept action administration Africa answers Arabic Arabic script areas argued asked attempted authority became become better British British Somaliland called century Cismaaniya claim clan coast colonial commission concerning considered culture decision democratic demonstrate dialogues discussed economic Egyptian elite English equality European example fact forced foreign give hypothesis important independence influence institutions Islamic issue Italian Italy Kenyan land Latin script less Lewis linguistic meaning Muqdisho never official participation person political possible prefer Press problem question region relativity religious responses role rule Sayid seemed significant situation social society Somali language Somali Republic speakers speaking speech structure subjects suggested teacher things thought trade traditional translated understand University values writing written